Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephan Reisig's avatar

A well-written article. Thanks for that.

Indeed, we should never forget that discussing and solving certain major global problems is insurmountable. Just as the crash of the financial system will inevitably come. Certain issues must indeed be looked at closely. But we must never forget at this stage of the current juncture that all these major issues have been HIJACKED by a relatively small group of people, who have too much power and money thrown at themSELVES, and who are now abusing all these important and major issues on a global scale for their own gain.

Qui Bono is the question, which we MUST ask ourselves regularly, while at the same time avoiding getting too deeply lost in the details. For the latter is what the '1%' really wants : For all of us to be and remain distracted so that they can, for instance, quietly get on with preparations for the CBDC. Or a W.H.O., which can then quietly continue its preparations of its so-called "Pandemic Treaty"

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

There is a simple often overlooked (meta)fact about Natural Sciences: they are NO subject for democratic or social reasoning. The majority of Scientists of any given field of knowledge can easily be dead wrong. This is a wellknown fact since classical physics pretended to know everything about the working of the universe but failed to explain some of the very Fundaments of their own well-developed but incomplete Science a 100 years ago. Then Quantum Mechanics came to the rescue by turning everything upside down. This desaster led Karl Popper, one of the 20th century's most influential philosophers of science, to the rejection of the classical inductivist views on the scientific method in favour of empirical falsification. From this Perspective one could conclude that modern climate "Science" is no Natural Science at all, but some redicularily distorted kind of applied sociology, applied by those Powers that somehow manged to gain leverage upon climate "Scientists" by control of their funding...

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts