Discover more from A Lily Bit
Happy 4th of July!
An Insistent Appeal to Annihilate the Misguided Construct of Collectivism in Favor of Personal Freedom
The truly great citizens of any land are not etched into history by their subservience to power, their conformity to the prevailing order, or their docile acquiescence. Rather, their magnificence unfurls when they audaciously hold their ground, even in the face of authority, showing an unyielding dedication to preserving the honor, dignity, and liberty of their beliefs.
Across the four corners of the earth, a troubling pattern is taking shape. Political architectures are increasingly deviating from values such as the reverence for rational debate, open discourse, freedom of speech, and the sacredness of individual and property rights. Instead, we are witnessing a chilling swing toward ideologies steeped in authoritarianism.
In these authoritative structures, the capital of influence isn't veracity but a sinister concoction of deceit and falsehoods. The craft of manipulation and propaganda is deployed with a frightening finesse, while the spread of dread and psychological warfare serve as potent instruments to dominate and quell the masses. Such strategies are too frequently utilized to validate political maneuvers and policies that ominously threaten to snuff out the very flame of existence and liberty.
This article is free. And so are most. However, your support as a paid subscriber enables me to continue producing high-quality, independent journalism on this important topics. As an ad-free platform, I rely on the support of my readers to keep this content accessible and free from external influence.
It may spark wonder, then, how those in power sustain their hold, persuading the populace to surrender their painstakingly earned freedoms in exchange for an ever-expanding grasp of governmental control. It's a confounding paradox that ought to set off alarm bells for any advocate of liberty. The machinations of persuasion, whether subtle or blatant, can be alarmingly complex, but their impact is plainly visible in the degradation of civil liberties and individual rights. This is a discourse we must unflinchingly perpetuate if we aspire to shield the essence of democracy and freedom that numerous societies cherish intensely.
Observers are left bewildered and deeply stirred by the seemingly enigmatic stratagems politicians deploy to beguile ordinary citizens into relinquishing their personal freedoms, cheerfully embracing a severe degree of state domination as an acceptable trade-off.
Moreover, there is an unsettling perplexity and profound worry surrounding the relatively lackluster resistance to this encroachment on liberty. History's recurring narrative resoundingly warns us that without freedom, universal despair inevitably ensues. It raises an existential question: why isn't there a louder chorus of voices ardently advocating for freedom when its void manifests in a dystopian world rife with intense suffering and adversity?
In the eloquent articulation of Albert Camus, “When freedom witnesses an alarming retreat across significant expanses of the contemporary world, it is likely due to the insidious efficacy and cynical precision of today's tools of subjugation. Equally culpable is the retreat of her genuine defenders, debilitated by overwhelming fatigue, despair, or misled tactics and policies, consciously choosing to sever their association with her.”
At the heart of resolving any conundrum lies the requisite of recognizing the existence of the problem itself. Absent this cognizance, formulating solutions becomes a Sisyphean task. This dearth of awareness stands, arguably, as one of the key factors facilitating the rapid fading of freedom from our contemporary world.
The illusion of freedom serves as one of the most potent shackles of servitude. As echoed in the insightful words of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, “Numerous individuals remain blissfully under the impression that they are residing in freedom.” Yet, his deeply resonant observation bears an unshakeable truth, “None are ensnared in a more hopeless form of bondage than those who labor under the delusion that they are, indeed, free.”
Those who fancy themselves as unquestionably free are often myopic to the stark truths of contemporary governance. The very act of being governed in the present world carries a spectrum of implications that are frequently ignored or overlooked. It implies an existence where one is ceaselessly “watched, analyzed, surveilled, guided, and confined by law.” It entails being “numerically tagged, regulated, logged, indoctrinated, and preached to.” It denotes living beneath the stern hand of control, being “constrained, evaluated, judged, censored, and dictated to.”
What adds an unnerving dimension to this narrative is that this pervasive control is frequently wielded by entities that might not have a rightful claim to such authority. These organizations might lack the requisite wisdom, comprehension, and ethical integrity to administer governance in a fair and equitable manner. Consequently, those who fall under their reign might not just be unjustifiably tethered, but potentially preyed upon or manipulated.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, in his seminal piece “The Law of Freedom,” shed a piercing light on this predicament. He emphasized that acknowledging our deficiency of genuine freedom serves as a crucial catalyst for correcting this regrettable state of affairs. It's pivotal to recognize that what we perceive as freedom might merely be an illusion, a deceptive facade concealing a stark reality of control and manipulation.
Only through this sobering acknowledgement can we initiate the process of questioning and challenging the systems and structures that impose these constraints upon us. Only then can we begin the conscious endeavor of crafting a society where freedom transcends perception and culminates in reality. This forms the indispensable inception point for any discourse or action aimed at reversing the conditions that compromise our real freedom.
As long as we remain blind to the chains of servitude that ensnare us, we will continue to be incapable of shattering them. Yet, the instant we discern and confess our fetters, we can ignite the battle against them. This fight not only emboldens us but also becomes a cornerstone in the chiseling of a brighter world.
Albert Camus strikingly articulated, “The onus upon mankind does not reside in forsaking historical conflicts or capitulating to the brutal, unsparing aspects of such struggles. Rather, their calling is to uphold their moral fabric, to stand firm for humanity against the forces that seek to dominate it, and to steadfastly defend freedom against looming threats that strive to smother it. The yardstick of a man's grandeur lies in his determination to surmount his circumstances. And if those circumstances are unjust, he possesses but one route to rise above them - by personifying justice himself.”
Within the covers of his influential work, “The Law of Freedom,” Albert Camus highlighted that the pervasive unawareness of the vanishing of freedom isn't the lone rationale behind its alarming regression in our world today.
Indeed, there exists another potent idea that has seeped into the collective psyche of many, an idea that, if left uncontradicted, could tragically signal the end of freedom for our generation.
This belief is ardently promulgated by a substantial cadre of politicians, methodically instilled in burgeoning minds via educational apparatuses and popular culture, and passionately endorsed by a significant segment of mainstream media tastemakers. The ideology being examined under the microscope here is none other than collectivism.
To grasp the essence of collectivism, we must wrestle with this elemental conundrum: Is the individual created to serve society, or is society architected to serve the individual?
Champions of collectivism unflinchingly adhere to the former premise of this dichotomy, contending that an individual's raison d'être is to be of service to society. Consequently, they assert that an individual must relegate personal ambitions to the back burner and conduct themselves in a manner that amplifies societal welfare, even if it necessitates sacrificing personal aspirations for the communal benefit.
The doctrine of collectivism forms the bedrock of political ideologies such as communism, fascism, and socialism. As vocalized by one of the most infamous advocates of collectivism, the collective welfare must invariably supersede individual well-being.
The edicts of collectivism have been executed by a litany of historical despots, including figures like Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao. The aftermath in each instance has, tragically, been marred by mass fatalities, destruction, and pervasive suffering.
This subsequently gives rise to an intriguing query: how does privileging the welfare of the collective over the individual breed such catastrophic repercussions? Isn't it a virtuous and empathetic endeavor to relinquish personal interests for the enhancement of society at large?
Upon initial observation, collectivism might appear as a beacon of virtuosity. Yet, upon delving deeper, we uncover a fundamental philosophical blunder known as the Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness eroding the pragmatic enactment of this ideology.
This fallacy arises when an abstract idea is erroneously treated as if it were a concrete entity manifesting in reality. Collectivism, by positing that an individual ought to relinquish personal ambitions for the betterment of society, endows the abstract notion of "society" with the status of tangible existence.
Nonetheless, as astutely discerned by Carl Jung, society is but a term or construct signifying the mutual interactions amongst a collection of individuals. It does not hold a tangible existence, but serves as a conceptual apparatus to facilitate our comprehension and navigation of our intertwined lives.
A concept, inherently, cannot sustain life. In contrast to an individual, who occupies a palpable presence in the world, society is a conceptual abstraction utilized to signify a dynamic conglomerate of individuals cohabitating and interacting within a communal expanse.
Regardless of the depth and breadth of one's exploration, a tangible entity christened 'society', distinguishable in a manner akin to how we differentiate an individual, will remain elusive. Society doesn't possess a standalone existence apart from the thoughts, actions, and interplays of individuals. It doesn't have personal aspirations, it doesn't embark on any distinct pursuits.
This axiom remains valid for all other collectivist constructs. Drawing from the sagacity of Carl Jung, a nation, much like a state, is nothing beyond a personified abstraction. It doesn't bear a life separate from its individual constituents and hence, isn't a goal in itself. The quintessence of life is housed within individuals; it's within the confines of individual lives that the ultimate significance of existence is unearthed.
Since 'society' is merely a concept, void of capability to think, act, articulate, or choose, it becomes imperative to vest certain individuals or factions with the authority to delineate this so-called larger societal good. Subsequently, these entities are also endowed with the power to mandate individuals to conform to this defined 'good'.
Historically, tracing back to the dawn of civilization, it has predominantly been the governing elites who have self-anointed themselves as arbiters of this larger good. Hence, it's hardly startling that this alleged 'larger good' often conveniently dovetails with the interests of those wielding power.
Reflecting on such collectivist structures, 20th-century psychologist Nathaniel Brandon penned, “Within such frameworks, the individual has perennially been the casualty, twisted against their own self-interest and enjoined to practice altruism. They are counseled to forsake their personal aspirations in service to some purportedly superior value, which has been variously termed as God, Pharaoh, Emperor, King, Society, State, Race, Proletariat, or the Cosmos.”
In a perplexing paradox of human chronicle, the doctrine that fundamentally compels us to see ourselves as beings ordained for sacrifice has been broadly accepted as an emblem of kindness and love for humankind.
From the earliest individual who was offered up on a tribal altar for the collective prosperity, to the nonconformists and dissenters immolated at the stake for the betterment of the multitudes or the glory of God, to the millions exterminated in labor camps for the alleged advantage of the race or the proletariat, or the millions inoculated with experimental substances to bolster public health, this morality grounded in collectivism has provided the rationale for every despotism and atrocity, both past and present.
The philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, a fervent proponent of collectivism whose ideologies profoundly influenced Karl Marx, endorsed collectivism's negation of individuality with the ensuing words: “A solitary individual, needless to mention, is something lesser and, as such, must subordinate themselves to the ethical collective. Therefore, if the state calls for life, the individual must surrender it.”
In this vein of thought, the sole worth that a human being embodies is strictly through the state. Contrary to the deceptive philosophies promoted by collectivism, no construct – be it the larger good of society, the state, or any other terminology utilized to denote a collective of humans – bears supremacy over living, breathing individuals. It is these very individuals whose spontaneous actions genuinely incite creativity and nurture growth in the world.
As articulated by 19th-century British philosopher Oberon Herbert, “The individual reigns supreme, and all other entities exist to serve this monarch.”
He further expounded, “The individual forms a part of numerous collectives - their school, their university, their club, their profession, their town or county, their church, their political party, their nation. However, the individual eternally surpasses them all. All these varied collectives, without exception, exist for the individual's advantage. They exist to serve them. They exist for their benefit and utilization.”
This conviction, venerating the individual as the supreme entity, significantly influenced the Enlightenment thinkers of the 17th and 18th centuries. It ignited a rapid wave of awareness of the critical correlation between freedom and the individual's unassailable rights to life, liberty, and property.
In its core, the idea of individual rights reinforces the view that the sole kind of freedom truly deserving of the title is one that empowers us to strive for our own welfare in our chosen way, on the condition that we don't violate others' rights or hinder their pursuits towards their personal well-being. Each person is seen as the rightful steward of their physical, emotional, and spiritual health.
Champions for individual rights aren't propelled by apathy towards the challenges and pain endured by others. Quite the contrary, they discern that when every single one of us is bestowed the freedom to strive for our personal well-being, elements such as social cooperation, the division of labor, and a thriving society organically emerge from a grassroots level, thereby bolstering our collective ability to aid each other.
Absent the wealth creation engine empowered by freedom, even the noblest of intentions cannot secure bread, shelter, and clothing for the less fortunate.
Contrastingly, collectivists posit that giving individual rights precedence over the 'greater good' obstructs social cooperation and breeds a fragmented society where each individual morphs into an isolated entity, abandoned to their fate. This assertion fundamentally misconstrues the dynamics of individual rights and societal prosperity.
Being innately social beings, we only witness the dissolution of social ties when a governing body, under the guise of serving the 'greater good', wields its power to impose social isolation or incite dread and mistrust amongst kith and kin.
In his penetrating analysis of collectivist political systems of the 20th century, the distinguished medical doctor Joost Meerloo remarked, “…within the confines of the Iron Curtain, the most pervasive affliction in the totalitarian system was a profound sense of mental isolation. Individuals existed in solitude, in a perpetual state of high alert, ensnared by an omnipresent atmosphere of mutual distrust.”
Carl Jung, who bore witness to the ascendancy of totalitarianism across Europe during the mid-20th century, made a similarly disquieting observation, “…the mass state does not strive to cultivate mutual understanding and interpersonal connections. On the contrary, it endeavors towards disunity, towards the psychological seclusion of the individual.”
Encouraging social cooperation and prosperity is not effectively accomplished through top-down centralized authority, but by loosening the chains of control and empowering individuals to chart their own course. This is the essence of what a society anchored in the principles of individual rights enables.
As the timeless adage reverberates, 'Live and let live', or in the words of David Kelly, “…individual rights empower individuals to take charge of their own lives and tend to their own necessities, while also bestowing the freedom indispensable for fulfilling these obligations.”
Individuals are bestowed with the freedom to act in accordance with their own discernment, pursue their individual aspirations, and manage the tangible possessions they have earned through their diligent endeavors.
These rights encapsulate the concept that individuals are autonomous beings, impervious to being coerced into serving societal objectives against their will, as eloquently elucidated by Kelly in his work 'The Greatest History of Humanity'.
In the grand tapestry of existence, individual rights serve as the cornerstone that enables us to strive for our individual welfare through our distinctive paths, while honoring the sanctity of others' person and property. Thus, we are entitled to the hallowed freedoms of speech, movement, association, and assembly. We lay claim to the rights of property and personal autonomy, as well as the cherished right to engage in labor and savor the fruits of our toil.
A person stands as the unassailable sovereign of their own essence and possessions, equal in stature to the greatest, beholden to none.
These individual rights transcend boundaries and borders, enveloping all human beings across the globe. They persist irrespective of their formal recognition within a nation's legal constitution. They are immutable, impervious to being bestowed or stripped away by any individual, government, or institution.
A person's inherent rights, originating within their very being, belong exclusively to them, even in the face of the entire world. Any trespass upon these rights is deemed a transgression, whether committed by a solitary figure marked as a thief or by countless multitudes identifying themselves as a governing body.
In a society where a profound reverence and unwavering dedication to individual rights prevail, the individual ascends to the exalted position of a sovereign, and thus, attains true freedom.
However, when individual rights are violated under the guise of public safety or the illusory concept of the 'greater good', the individual is reduced to a mere political possession, susceptible to the grip of oppression, confinement, or annihilation at the hands of any mob, government, or institution in power, as they deem fit and necessary.
As lucidly expounded by Lysander Spooner, "...the distinction between political slavery and chattel slavery is virtually inconsequential."
In both cases, the core principle of self-ownership and the rightful fruits of one's labor are discarded, replaced by the notion that others can assert dominion over an individual, exerting control over both their person and possessions for their own gratification and at their caprice, as articulated by Lysander Spooner in 'The Modern World'.
In our present era, we find ourselves gradually gravitating towards a widespread acceptance of collectivism, consequently edging closer to the realm of political enslavement alluded to by Spooner.
Amidst such times, it becomes imperative to recognize that although the majority may willingly embrace subservience, those of us who stand as sentinels of freedom share a spiritual kinship with fellow guardians of liberty across the globe.
Thus, through our resistance, we reaffirm our collective existence and fortify the resolute defense of freedom itself. In the grand symphony of our quest for freedom, let us now heed the resounding crescendo of truth. Let us comprehend, with unwavering conviction, that no weapon is as formidable as the indomitable will of free men and women. It is a force that reverberates through the annals of history, shaking the foundations of tyranny and igniting the flames of change.
Yet, we must confront the stark reality that all of our politicians have strayed far from the path of moral rectitude. Their compass, once a guiding light, has been obscured by the shadow of corruption. We must make it known, in no uncertain terms, that their betrayal of the very principles they swore to uphold will not go unnoticed or unchallenged.
For we, as a collective humanity, hold the pursuit of peace and freedom as our loftiest aspiration. It is a beacon that illuminates our shared journey towards a brighter future. We steadfastly refuse to surrender to their twisted, sick world of falsehoods, corruption, and repugnant violence.
Now is the time to rise. Let our voices echo with the clarion call of truth and justice. Let our actions be a testament to our unwavering resolve. Together, let us forge a new paradigm where freedom reigns, where integrity guides our leaders, and where the essence of humanity is restored.
This is our solemn duty, our noble cause. We shall not falter, for the spirit of liberty burns within us. Let us seize the moment, united in our defiance, as we embark on a journey to reclaim our sacred birthright – a world that champions truth, shuns corruption, and embraces the harmonious melody of peace and freedom.
There is a price we will not pay!
If you found the information provided insightful please consider becoming a paid subscriber for more in-depth insights on various topics.
If you don’t want to commit to a paid subscription but still wish to support me, you can donate an amount you choose here. Most of my content is free to read, so it is greatly appreciated. Thank you!
If you do not wish to make a contribution of any kind, please leave at least a like. It costs you nothing and helps others see this post. Thank You :)