Political Dementia
Americans Have Become Disillusioned Royalists, Craving a Leader to Idolize or Despise
Last week, X’s conservative choir decided to hurl insults at a Vogue editor because she apparently had the audacity to critique how their deity-in-chief's wife chose to adorn herself for her official White House portrait.
I slogged through the “article” - all three paragraphs of it - expecting some scathing takedown, but it was barely a whisper compared to the cacophony of indignation from the right.
Sure, her critique was politically charged, especially after Vogue spent four years worshipping at the altar of Jill Biden's potato sack chic. But here's where it gets rich - conservatives, in their infinite wisdom, decided the best response was to match the pettiness, proving they're just as capable of stooping to new lows as their liberal adversaries.
I couldn't care less about the “fashionista” who wrote the piece; her own taste might be up for debate, but watching the conservative meltdown was like watching a slow-motion car crash - cringe-worthy and irritating.
I'm not bringing this up to dissect the wardrobe choices of Melania, which, let's face it, requires an army of fashion consultants (that we have to pay for) to make her look like she didn't just step out of a time machine from the '90s. No, the real issue here is the cult-like devotion so many folks have to their chosen political messiahs.
It's like watching a bunch of lemmings jump off a cliff, but instead of a cliff, it's into the abyss of blind faith in leaders who probably couldn't pick out their own socks. It’s a dangerous idolatry where people worship at the altar of their political saviors, turning governance into a fan convention where the only thing missing is the cosplay.
In recent years, this political idolatry has become a full-blown epidemic where people bow down to leaders like they're some divine oracle, not elected officials. It's like watching a congregation at a bizarre church where the hymns are campaign slogans, and the holy water is political propaganda.
This blind allegiance turns democracy into a personality pageant, where policy is secondary to the cult of personality. Screaming masses on the left and right are turning the White House into a shrine to their reality show Gods where critical thinking goes to die.
A personality cult is a twisted carnival where one human is propped up as some colossal deity, wrapped in the illusion of greatness, perfection, and supremacy. This is the ultimate ego trip, the deification of someone who's been crowned extraordinary, their so-called “heroic” deeds nothing more than a narrative spun to enchant the masses in a circus of socio-political manipulation.
In this spectacle, the central figure is worshipped by a throng of sycophants as an untouchable icon, a living embodiment of their deepest aspirations, especially when the nation's sinking in the quicksand of crises.
This cult of personality reveals humanity's pathetic craving for a tangible symbol of power, a figurehead at the nexus of inspiration, authority, and bureaucracy, without which society supposedly “crumbles into chaos”, obliterating any cultural heritage.
It's like Americans left England because they couldn't stand their King, only to cross an ocean and establish a new land where they could continue this bizarre, masochistic ritual of pining for a monarch. Now, they've got themselves a new kind of royalty, one they can either adore or despise with the fervor of a soap opera fan.
It's the same old game, just with different players and a new flag, proving that perhaps what they really wanted wasn't freedom from monarchy, but the drama and passion of having a government to obsess over.
It's a manipulative vehicle, not for genuine change, but for broadcasting the myth of a national “savior,” one who's supposedly anointed with superhuman capabilities to yank the downtrodden from the jaws of exploitation and oppression, guiding them to a utopian “promised land.”
But let's not kid ourselves with this fairy tale; history shows us that while some of these cults have momentarily aligned with public hopes, many more have crashed and burned, their once-idolized leaders dragging their tarnished reputations into the abyss of disgrace.
On a supposedly “positive” note, history is littered with personality cults that have seemingly breathed new life into moribund socio-political systems, hardening their structures through the zealous activism of followers hoodwinked by their charismatic leaders.
Across various eras, we've seen these outsized personalities not just recognized but lionized, their legacies enshrined by future generations as if they were saints rather than mere mortals. These so-called heroes become the rallying cry, the flag under which the populace unites when the specter of collapse looms, be it from within or without.
But let's be clear: when this cult of personality penetrates the cultural zeitgeist, it doesn't just color the nation's emotional landscape; it fundamentally alters the spiritual core of its citizens.
Max Weber dubs this phenomenon “charismatic authority.” Unlike the dry legality of law or the crusty weight of tradition, charismatic authority thrives on the magnetic, often irrational appeal of the leader, turning followers into zealots ready to defend or even die for their cause. They are constructing a myth, one that's as intoxicating as it is potentially destructive.
On pages 125-126 of “Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology,” Max Weber articulates:
There are three pure types of domination. The validity of the claims to legitimacy may be based on:
Rational grounds – resting on a belief in the legality of enacted rules and the right of those elevated to authority under such rules to issue commands (legal authority).
Traditional grounds – resting on an established belief in the sanctity of immemorial traditions and the legitimacy of those exercising authority under them (traditional authority); or finally,
Charismatic grounds – resting on devotion to the exceptional sanctity, heroism or exemplary character of an individual person, and of the normative patterns of order revealed or ordained by him (charismatic authority).
In the realm of legal authority, obedience is directed towards an impersonal, legally established order. This obedience extends to individuals in office only because their commands are formally legal and within the scope of their official authority.
Under traditional authority, the allegiance is personal, directed towards the chief who holds the time-honored position of power. Here, obedience is rooted in personal loyalty, confined to the sphere of customary duties.
However, in the case of charismatic authority, it's not just the office or tradition that demands obedience, but the charismatic leader himself. The followers' obedience stems from personal trust in the leader's revelation, heroism, or exemplary qualities, as long as these fall within the scope of the believers' faith in his charisma.
Legal authority might keep the gears of bureaucracy turning, and traditional authority might maintain the status quo through the comfort of the familiar. But charismatic authority? It's the wild card that can mobilize, inspire, or even radicalize masses, leveraging personal magnetism over institutional stability or traditional reverence. It's the kind of power that can both ignite revolutions and plunge societies into chaos, all based on the perceived divine or heroic nature of one individual.
In Weber's perspective, “charismatic authority” within a personality cult is often viewed positively as a vital component during pivotal moments of national importance. This type of authority galvanizes individuals, solidifying their dedication to a noble cause and encouraging them to act heroically, disregarding potential risks. In these scenarios, the personality cult not only glows but also enriches the cultural memory of a nation, creating legends that outlast the individuals themselves.
However, the promise of personality cults quickly sours in the contemporary world, where mass media plays a dominant role. Here, personality cults are not organically grown but are often inflated through media propaganda, employing all manner of manipulative tactics.
The aim is to elevate the personal character of a chosen 'hero' to serve the agenda of an emerging political faction or alliance. This calculated exaggeration seeks to condition the populace to align with the political objectives of the sponsoring party, essentially brainwashing the majority into submission.
The manipulation via propaganda, laden with falsehoods and deceit, is the most potent tool in fostering a personality cult. Once established, this cult begins to deteriorate the political landscape at a gradual but relentless pace. Absolute obedience to the cult leader becomes the norm, and those behind the scenes resort to increasingly heinous methods to maintain control, treating once-allies not as partners but as subjects to be commanded.
The dark side of personality cults lies in crafting a narrative that extols a manufactured hero, attributing to them all the virtues of an ideal leader, despite their actual inadequacies.
The superficiality of such cults eventually exposes the inherent flaws of an incompetent leader, whose actions on a national scale are often detrimental, adversely affecting the populace's welfare. History teaches us that many personality cults do not spring from the grassroots but are rather the artificial constructs of political entities aiming for dominance.
In the end, we see a dichotomy: personality cults that genuinely arise from the people versus those that are artificially imposed by interest groups. This distinction marks the line between a potentially positive manifestation of charismatic leadership and its more sinister, contrived counterpart.
And here we are, in the twilight of political discourse, where the cult of personality has reached its zenith, or rather, its nadir. We've traded in the wisdom of statesmen for the senile ramblings of a grandpa who couldn't find his way out of the Oval Office, and now, we're enthralled by a carnival barker with a golden mane, promising to lead us to a land where every tweet is a policy and every meme is gospel. The adulation for these figures, whether it's the doddering old man who once graced the White House or the current occupant who treats it like his personal reality show, is not just misguided; it's downright dangerous.
Leadership has become nothing more than a side show, a spectacle where the main act is not policy or progress but performance. We're in an era where governance is overshadowed by the theatrics of who can be the loudest, the most controversial, or the most entertaining.
It's not about leading; it's about being hailed as a messiah or scolded as a villain, with the mainstream media gleefully stoking the flames of division. They've turned politics into a reality TV drama, where the dumbed down audience is more focused on whom to cheer or jeer rather than what's actually being done for the country. This circus keeps the public distracted, infighting over personalities while real issues are left to fester, unaddressed and unresolved.
It's about the pathetic spectacle of nations that lost their marbles, fawning over leaders who've clearly lost theirs. We've gone from celebrating the clarity of a statesman to cheering the incoherence of an Alzheimer's patient and the bluster of the Palantir puppet. This isn't politics; it's a circus where the clowns have taken over, and we're all too hypnotized by the bright lights and empty promises to notice the tent is on fire.
We're not just dealing with a personality cult; we're living through the age of political dementia, where the electorate clings to the coattails of decrepit icons or megalomaniacs, painting their every gaffe for genius.
It's a tragic, laughable procession. And as we trudge further along this path, mistaking mediocrity for magnificence, we're not merely veering off course; we're descending into madness, witnessing the once-proud American experiment devolve into a national farce with no clear direction and no one to end the nightmare.
How you can support my writing:
Restack, like and share this post via email, text, and social media
Thank you; your support keeps me writing and helps me pay the bills. 🧡
What a great article! Well done!
Great essay.