How to Reclaim Humanity in the Age of Technology
The Impact of Rapid Technological Advancement on Society and the Urgent Role of the Humanities.
In this era of rapid technological advancement, there has been extensive discussion about the significance of the humanities. We observe an allocation of funds towards “digital humanities” initiatives, aiming to provide state-of-the-art communication technology. This technology is projected to revolutionize education by delivering online videos that effectively convey intricate information to a global audience.
Scholars in fields such as history and social sciences have secured funding that enables them to leverage advanced supercomputing technology to address historical and societal challenges. Through the use of supercomputers, they process vast amounts of textual and statistical data. Their findings, which often bring unexpected insights, are presented using captivating graphs and charts. While big data exposes new concealed truths to us, there is a concern that the time spent on reading and contemplation might be significantly reduced.
Despite the substantial research that creatively integrates new technology, the unfortunate reality is that despite the numerous articles celebrating a renaissance of the humanities, the presence of humanities educators and the enrollment of students in humanities courses are diminishing everywhere.
It's not that students lack interest; rather, the societal and economic pressures are compelling students to forego the pursuit of knowledge and instead focus on conforming to narrow standards in order to secure employment. Consequently, fewer individuals engage in reading books or possess the ability to analyze complex subjects comprehensively.
In essence, this situation represents a profound crisis.
This article is free. And so are most. However, your support as a paid subscriber enables me to continue producing high-quality, independent journalism on these important topics. As an ad-free platform, I rely on the support of my readers to keep this content accessible and free from external influence.
A genuine resurgence of the humanities is an urgent requirement in our current landscape. Unfortunately, in discussions about technology, the humanities are often portrayed as valuable content to be utilized on digital screens or social platforms, all powered by the latest generation of computer chips. While the argument might emphasize the ultimate importance of content, the reality remains that our society's focus lies in technology investment rather than delving into the exploration of human experiences.
However, the solutions we urgently seek won't be found in these ventures. Instead, we must detach ourselves from technology and take the time to evaluate the intricate ramifications of technological advancements on our entire society. This involves reflecting on how these changes impact our perception of the world.
In this endeavor, the humanities offer invaluable insights. Nonetheless, the profound wisdom embedded in the pages of old books will only begin to resonate with us once we acknowledge a straightforward truth: the rapid technological transformation of human society is so profoundly disruptive and bewildering that it places us at the brink of a potential catastrophe in the near future.
Only upon acknowledging that the profound insights offered by philosophy, literature, history, and aesthetics hold greater significance for our future than simply advancing semiconductor technology or supercomputers will we begin to address the crisis at hand. However, despite the deepening shadows, I've observed limited signs of this shift.
A stark comparison emerges between the meager funding allocated to the humanities (and even scarcer funds for the meticulous analysis of technology's societal impact) and the substantial resources poured into the development of technologies with commercial applications, irrespective of their broader societal effects. A rigorous examination leads us to a painful realization: we have yet to truly embrace the humanities or grasp the magnitude of the crisis.
Evidently, emerging technologies designed to exploit basic human instincts have fostered a widespread addiction to imagery, spanning from games to pornography. We encourage individuals to satiate their curiosity and desires without encountering intellectual challenges or ethical considerations.
In the era of post-modernism and post-industrialism, advanced technology has taken center stage in the socio-cultural landscape. Undoubtedly, society has greatly reaped the rewards of the remarkable technology that continues to be invented and innovated, leading in an almost uninterrupted direction. Tasks that were once burdensome household chores, office responsibilities, and factory operations have been transformed into effortless endeavors thanks to new technology. We are now surrounded by incredible gadgets, equipment, and tools that are readily available at our fingertips, operated with ease.
In the current context, the Internet stands as the dominating force in the post-modern technological panorama. It has ushered us into unprecedented wonders within the cyber-world, offering instant information and facilitating various applications. The excitement appears boundless as we venture into novel and unexplored realms that emerge along the information superhighway. We've even stumbled upon recreational pursuits that captivate our sense of play to the extent of becoming entranced by their engaging challenges, often continuing into the early hours of the morning. This captivating technology has enthralled us in what is often referred to as the “third wave” civilization (in a nod to the late futurologist Alvin Toffler), commonly known as the Age of Information.
However, not all that the Internet offers is beneficial to individuals or society at large. It has introduced social networking sites and enticing applications such as online games, which have led individuals down the path of addiction. The consumption of time has increased while productive output has declined. Especially among the younger population, valuable hours are spent battling virtual adversaries, watching humorous videos, and browsing amusing photos on tablets, mobiles, and laptops. This comes at the expense of dedicating quality time to academic assignments or professional duties. In this state of affairs, the allure seems endless, and the passage of time becomes a secondary concern.
Excessive exposure to the aforementioned devices adversely impacts brain function and disrupts the circadian rhythm. In effect, concentration dwindles, and those who find themselves in this predicament struggle to perform effectively in more significant endeavors, both within society and the workplace. At its worst, this situation might even evolve into a serious health concern, as excessive engagement with games and social networks leads individuals to indulge in junk food consumption and evade physical activities.
In solitude, in front of screens, people isolate themselves from their fellow humans within the context of a community of warm bodies. Face-to-face conversations have become less common as online messaging via email or platforms like Telegram takes precedence. In this manner, the concept of socialization has been redefined to the extent that physical presence is no longer a requisite in paramount reality.
Behaviors such as watching others eat or engaging in sexual acts have become normalized. By leveraging technology to appeal to the most primal functions of the human brain, we inadvertently foster a mindless consumer culture. Regrettably, few are contemplating the long-term implications for our country a century from now.
Evaluating the consequences of something on a state of affairs necessitates a standardized scale characterized by a spectrum that delineates two opposing axiological poles: the positive and the negative. Within the context of the present issue, we confront the query: What are the favorable and adverse effects of technology on society? We raise this inquiry early on to avoid being swayed by the one-sided notion that technology invariably steers a course that benefits society. This perspective becomes prevalent because the most audible voices we encounter—and often opt to heed—are those of zealous advocates and users of the technology in question. Their fervent promotion gains considerable prominence when media amplifies the technology's positive aspects through exaggerated advertising. This tactic veers individuals away from adopting a critical stance, which generally leads to a state of unfortunate susceptibility.
However, this line of concern does not prevent us from delivering a positive verdict. Instead, the challenge posed is to foster an equitable and thus unbiased insight into the subject of technology's impact on society. This approach is regarded as reasonable, given that the task encompasses the intermediary stages that traverse from one end of the spectrum to the other. Thus, we delve into the indistinct shades constituting the spectrum that forms the basis of our intended evaluation.
Technology fundamentally represents humanity's achievement to simplify an otherwise burdensome undertaking. From the outset, we discern the commendable intent propelling the positive value of technology. Its purpose is not destructive but constructive, not obstructive but facilitative, not problem-generating but problem-solving. At its inception, technology bears an unblemished character that fosters productivity, enhances proficiency, refines expertise, and advances competence. These benefits transcend individual beneficiaries to encompass an entire society's progression towards a higher plane of refinement. In this manner, technology fulfills its inherent mandate in the service of humanity.
However, technology's value is never innate; rather, it emerges from its human users. It is also within the control of these users that technology might deviate from its original trajectory and veer off-course. Technology, initially devised to cater to the interests of both individual users and the society that tolerates and accepts its operation, can therefore result in detrimental outcomes when handled irresponsibly.
A solution lies in carving out meaningful spaces within our society, where we unplug from technology and engage our senses in reading books, crafting art, building furniture, and exploring the world by foot, deepening our connection to it.
Within these active and mindful pursuits, we grasp the concept of causality. This understanding allows us to step back and draw analogies between the phenomena we observe and the broader societal context. The acts of reading, writing, painting, and observing facilitate a reconnection with our essence and a realization of the Earth's needs.
Without such breaks, we easily fall into the dangerous assumption that discarding plastic daily leaves no imprint on our environment, that using electronics bears no relation to the polluted air we breathe, and deceive ourselves into believing that allowing young children to spend their days on trivial video games doesn't hinder their capacity to comprehend the world.
The challenges posed by the actual fourth industrial revolution are monumental, notably the blurring of reality and fiction. As mechanical reproduction technologies accelerate, people witness images of lush trees on TV and assume our environment is thriving. They watch dramas depicting close-knit friendships and harmonious communities and mistakenly believe our society mirrors such ideals.
The virtual realm is fundamentally fictional, and our media is progressively tainted by such fabrications. Newspapers have evolved into platforms for selling predetermined images that funders wish people to accept as truth, rather than engaging in a rigorous exploration of societal reality.
Technology cannot aid us in comprehending how technological changes distort our perceptions of ourselves and the world. Only a meticulous contemplation of fundamental ethical principles (moral philosophy), the essence of existence (metaphysics), and the nature of knowledge and comprehension (epistemology) can provide assistance.
Shape the Future of this Newsletter: Your Voice Matters!
Due to philosophy's gradual retreat from our intellectual landscape just as rapid technological transformations are reshaping our perception of the world, we find ourselves in a particularly vulnerable position. Our lexicon lacks the terminology to depict the process through which our lives are reduced to hollow rituals by the ascendancy of computer codes in society. We struggle to fathom how utilizing search engines alters our interactions with the surrounding world and our connections with friends and family—as from personal experience, things found with a search engine can sometimes lead to someone irrevocably cutting ties with you and ending friendships without ever truly asking what the actual truth behind their findings was.
The decline of the humanities in shaping our perception of the world, coupled with the rise of an anti-intellectual culture stemming from the passivity displayed by many who identify primarily as consumers rather than active societal members, has fostered a concerning trend: the blurring of the distinction between science and technology.
This trend is particularly evident in advertising, which has supplanted analysis as the predominant content within our media ecosystem. Advertisements emphasize the enchanting attributes of novel technologies that astonish and please. Frequently, technology is presented as a means of entertainment or addressing inconveniences, yet it is largely detached from the pursuit of truth. Comprehension is discouraged, and wonderment is promoted.
Indeed, we inhabit a technology-driven era, witnessing the proliferation of new technologies (or novel combinations of existing ones). However, we do not inhabit a scientific age. This differentiation is obscured by the common practice of lumping both fields together under the term “science and technology,” thereby fostering sloppy reasoning.
Science entails the meticulous exploration of our surroundings in accordance with the scientific method. While there exist people who practice science in our society, fewer and fewer individuals within institutions, let alone the broader populace, possess a clear grasp of what science truly signifies.
“Whether or not it draws on new scientific research, technology is a branch of moral philosophy, not of science.”—Paul Goodman in “Can Technology be Humane?”
Ultimately, technology concerns the means through which we enhance our world and should be guided by the principles of moral philosophy. This encompasses the potential choice to abstain from developing or employing destructive technologies. Technology must never be conflated with the quest for truth, which hinges on a blend of speculation and unceasing systematic validation.
At its core, the humanities are indispensable to the cornerstone of genuine scientific inquiry: the scientific method. This method primarily demands a robust imagination capable of proposing numerous explanations to elucidate the phenomena we perceive, all of which can subsequently undergo rigorous analysis.
While rigorous analysis is necessary for generating sound science, it is imagination—proficiency in conjuring diverse explanations, even the outlandish ones—that constitutes the vital element in this process.
Albert Einstein was able to achieve a breakthrough in theoretical physics because he devoted hours to imagining how the universe might function, how the perspective of a photon might appear, and what unconventional explanations could elucidate ordinary phenomena. His approach resembled the storytelling found in novels, and this mode of thought enabled him to discern the imperceptible aspects that escaped those confined within established practices.
Our dependence on technology and a culture centered around consumption and commercialization have become so ingrained that breaking free from these constraints will prove immensely challenging. Nevertheless, the escalating fragmentation of our society and the detrimental impact of technology on the environment will ultimately compel us to do so.
Solutions to this crisis cannot be found within the familiar toolbox of semiconductors and smartphones. Instead, we will once again need to pry open the dust-covered chest labeled “The Humanities.”
In summation, it's crucial to acknowledge that appreciating the positive impacts of technology is distinct from being mindful of its negative repercussions on both individuals and society. While we all desire to relish the conveniences and advantages offered by modern technology, it's equally important to remain cognizant of the unfavorable aftermath when technology is wielded irresponsibly. A journey lies ahead, and instilling the positive essence of technology in the youth of this generation and beyond is imperative. When utilized with a high degree of responsibility, creativity, and efficiency, technology can truly contribute to progress.
The true power to shape this world has always lain in your hands. Choose well!
If you found the information provided insightful, and believe that independent journalism should be supported, please consider becoming a paid subscriber for more in-depth insights on various topics.
If you don’t want to commit to a paid subscription but still wish to support me, you can donate an amount you choose here. Most of my content is free to read, so it is greatly appreciated. Thank you!
If you do not wish to make a contribution of any kind, please leave at least a like. It costs you nothing and helps others see this post. Thank You :)
Turn off the TV, the computer, the smartphone.
Read a book, go to a house of worship, go to a museum.
Many wide ranging thoughts here which is actually its own answer. Technology makes the diversity of human response more visible to each of us. it gives everyone a voice louder than when the Internet was not present. It has always been messy and will continue to be so but that is democracy only more visible. I like to think that people like Oliver Anthony will emerge who define us better than the elites who constantly try to dominate the discussion. Anthony demonstrates how articulate and perceptive those who many assume someone with his background cannot possibly be. He relates to many of us at many levels. Truly elegant expression. Technology amplifies all expression but it is the content of that expression that finds a position surpassing all if it rings true.
We have to accept the amplification of nonsense by technology if we want voices like Anthony's to dominate the nonsense.