The False East vs. West Conflict: A Puppet Show for the Masses

The Collaboration between Eastern Governments and Globalist Entities

The pitfall that ensnares many political and economic analysts in their dissection of prevailing global paradigms is their unquestioning faith in the dominant narrative, a faith that blinds them to the discordant actions and utterances of political and economic leaders. Even within the freedom movement, a bastion of skepticism and media literacy, the malignant growths of assumption and bias often take root.

There are those within the freedom movement who are all too eager to swallow certain alternative mainstream narratives. They are quick to accept, for instance, that the escalating “conflict” between East and West is genuine, rather than orchestrated, or that Putin is waging a war against “woke western ideologies”.

One could present a litany of quotes and policy actions that demonstrate beyond doubt the collaboration between Eastern governments, including China and Russia, and globalist entities such as the International Monetary Fund, the Bank for International Settlements, the World Bank, and the U.N., all working towards the common goal of global governance and economic centralization. Yet, these individuals remain stubbornly deaf to such evidence.

They are hell-bent on casting the U.S. as the chief antagonist and the East as the valiant adversary. Their desperation for a glimmer of hope is so profound that they are willing to partake in the toxic fallacy of false dichotomies.

It's as if they're watching a puppet show, completely captivated by the drama unfolding on stage, oblivious to the puppeteers manipulating the strings from above. They're so engrossed in the spectacle that they fail to see the real game at play. The U.S., China, Russia, the IMF, the BIS, the World Bank, the U.N. - they're all puppets in the same show, performing for the benefit of the global elite.

The belief that the East is somehow a bulwark against globalism is not just naive, it's dangerous. It's like trusting a wolf to guard the henhouse because it promised not to eat the chickens. The East, like the West, is complicit in the globalist agenda. To believe otherwise is to fall prey to the oldest trick in the book: divide and conquer.

“The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another.” — Henry Kissinger, “Henry Kissinger On The Assembly Of A New World Order” 

“Part of people’s concern is just the sense that around the world the old order isn’t holding and we’re not quite yet to where we need to be in terms of a new order that’s based on a different set of principles, that’s based on a sense of common humanity, that’s based on economies that work for all people.” — Barack Obama

“We reiterate our strong commitment to the United Nations (UN) as the foremost multilateral forum entrusted with bringing about hope, peace, order and sustainable development to the world. The UN enjoys universal membership and is at the center of global governance and multilateralism.” — Fifth BRICS Summit Declaration

“We support the reform and improvement of the international monetary system, with a broad-based international reserve currency system providing stability and certainty. We welcome the discussion about the role of the SDR in the existing international monetary system including the composition of SDR’s basket of currencies. We support the IMF to make its surveillance framework more integrated and even-handed.” — Fifth BRICS Summit Declaration

The infatuation with the notion that the U.S. government and the banking elites surrounding it are at the sole apex of the new world order pyramid, scrambling for survival as the U.S. economy crumbles under the façade of false government and central banking statistics, is nothing short of misguided. How many times have we heard in the past years alone that the Federal Reserve has “backed itself into a corner” or that its policies have been caught “between a rock and a hard place”?

The naivety of such a viewpoint is almost laughable, for central bankers and internationalists have always exploited economic instability as a means to gain political and social advantage. The consolidation of world banking power following the Great Depression is a testament to this fact. Even former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has admitted (at least in part) that the Federal Reserve was responsible for that catastrophic implosion, an implosion that conveniently served the interests of international cartel banks such as JPMorgan.

However, the Federal Reserve is merely an appendage of a greater system; it is not the mastermind of the operation. To believe otherwise is to misunderstand the true nature of global power dynamics. The Fed is simply a tool, wielded by those who seek to control the world's financial systems.

To think that the U.S. economy's collapse would spell doom for the global elite is to fundamentally misunderstand their goals. They thrive on chaos and instability, using it to further consolidate power and advance their agenda. The collapse of one economy, even one as large as the U.S., is merely a stepping stone towards their ultimate goal: global economic domination.

We need to dispense with the notion that the global elite are somehow on the ropes, desperately trying to maintain their power in the face of economic collapse. They're not. They're orchestrating the chaos, pulling the strings from behind the scenes, and using it to further their own ends. The collapse of the U.S. economy is not a threat to their power; it's an opportunity.

In his seminal work “Tragedy And Hope,” Carroll Quigley, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and mentor to Bill Clinton, revealed the true power dynamics of global finance. He stated:

“It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called 'international' or 'merchant' bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks.”

This sentiment was echoed in Harper's Magazine's “Ruling The World Of Money,” which corroborated Quigley's assertion that global economic policy and, by extension, political policy is dominated by a select few elites. This domination is exercised through the unaccountable institutional framework of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).

The U.S. and the Federal Reserve are mere tentacles of the great vampire squid that is the new world order. And being a tentacle makes one, to a certain extent, expendable, if the trade will result in even greater centralization of power.

To believe that the U.S. is the linchpin of the globalist agenda is to fundamentally misunderstand the nature of power. The U.S. is merely a tool, wielded by those who seek to control the world's financial systems. The global elite are not beholden to any one nation or institution; they operate beyond the reach of national governments and international law.

The delusion that some within the freedom movement are under is that the fall of America will result in the fall of the new world order. In reality, the fall of America is a necessary step towards the rise of the new world order. The Economist confirmed this trend of economic “harmonization” in its 1988 article "Get Ready For A World Currency By 2018," which described the creation of a global currency called the "Phoenix" over three decades:

“The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate — and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate — would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case.”

The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.

We are now behind the brink of the “prediction” set forth by The Economist over 36 years ago. The BRICS nations, including Vladimir Putin's Russia, have all consistently called for the formation of a global reserve currency system under the direct control of the IMF and predicated on the basket methodology of the SDR. This new global system, as The Economist suggested, requires the marginalization of existing power structures and the end of sovereign economic control. Governments around the world, including the U.S., would be at the fiscal mercy of the new financial high priests through the use of insidious debt-based incentives given or withheld at the whim of the IMF.

China's induction into the SDR basket in 2015 was hailed by some in the mainstream media as insignificant, but IMF head Christine Lagarde presented the shift as a major event, not for China, but for the IMF and the SDR, which she proudly refers to as the “currency of currencies.”

The addition of China to the SDR was one of many trigger events for the continuing removal of the dollar as the world reserve currency. The monetary shift may accelerate rapidly if Saudi Arabia follows through with a possible plan to depeg from the dollar, effectively ending the petrodollar status the U.S. has enjoyed for decades.

This is, of course, the same IMF-controlled SDR system that Putin and the Kremlin have called for, despite the popular belief that Putin is somehow an opponent of the globalists.

Putin continues to push the narrative of the U.S. as the bumbling villain, while simultaneously supporting globalist institutions and the internationalization of economic and political governance. While many people were fixated on his “calling out” of the U.S. and its involvement in the creation of ISIS in one of his speeches at the U.N., they seemed to have completely overlooked his adoration of the United Nations and the development of a global governing body. Putin often speaks at cross purposes, just as Barack Obama does — one minute supporting sovereignty and freedom, the next minute calling for global centralization:

“Russia is ready to work together with its partners to develop the UN further on the basis of a broad consensus, but we consider any attempts to undermine the legitimacy of the United Nations as extremely dangerous. They may result in the collapse of the entire architecture of international relations, and then indeed there will be no rules left except for the rule of force.

Dear colleagues, ensuring peace and global and regional stability remains a key task for the international community guided by the United Nations. We believe this means creating an equal and indivisible security environment that would not serve a privileged few, but everyone.

Putin also expressed his support for the UN's fight against "climate change," the same climate change that Secretary of State John Kerry argued was a "contributing factor" in the crisis in Syria and the rise of ISIS. I have written in the past on the fraud of "man-made climate change (global warming)" and will not delve into that topic here, but the point remains that Putin is fully on board with this fraud, like all other puppet politicians around the globe:

"…One more issue that shall affect the future of the entire humankind is climate change. It is in our interest to ensure that the coming UN Climate Change Conference that will take place in Paris in December this year should deliver some feasible results. As part of our national contribution, we plan to limit greenhouse gas emissions to 70–75 percent of the 1990 levels by the year 2030.
It is indeed a challenge of global proportions. And I am confident that humanity does have the necessary intellectual capacity to respond to it. We need to join our efforts, primarily engaging countries that possess strong research and development capabilities, and have made significant advances in fundamental research. We propose convening a special forum under the auspices of the UN to comprehensively address issues related to the depletion of natural resources, habitat destruction, and climate change. Russia is willing to co-sponsor such a forum."

Indeed, it has been Putin's intention all along to support and defend the internationalist framework while simultaneously participating in the theatrical East versus West false paradigm:

“In the BRICS case, we see a whole set of coinciding strategic interests. First of all, this is the common intention to reform the international monetary and financial system. In the present form, it is unjust to the BRICS countries and to new economies in general. We should take a more active part in the IMF and the World Bank’s decision-making system. The international monetary system itself depends a lot on the US dollar, or, to be precise, on the monetary and financial policy of the US authorities. The BRICS countries want to change this."

The Chinese support the same agenda of an IMF-managed economic world:

"The world economic crisis shows the “inherent vulnerabilities and systemic risks in the existing international monetary system,” Gov. Zhou Xiaochuan said in an essay released Monday by the bank. He recommended creating a currency made up of a basket of global currencies and controlled by the International Monetary Fund and said it would help “to achieve the objective of safeguarding global economic and financial stability.””

The convergence of the desires of the BRICS and the designs of international bankers is a fascinating example of the Hegelian dialectic at work, creating the most elaborate public distraction in history. The ultimate solution to this artificially engineered problem is a single "multilateral" but centrally dictated world economic system and world government, otherwise known as the new world order.

To achieve this end, the globalists at the BIS and the IMF require a diminished U.S. dollar, greatly reduced U.S. living standards, and a much smaller U.S. geopolitical footprint. If you cannot understand why it seems that the Federal Reserve and U.S. government appear hell-bent on self-destruction, consider the facts and motivations at hand. Their job is not to save America, but to destroy it. Once you accept this reality, every disastrous development since the inception of the Fed a century ago, and all that is about to happen in the next few years, makes perfect sense.

This is not to say that the ultimate endgame of the new world order will result in victory. But the evidence shows that internationalists do have a plan, and they are implementing it systematically, with the participation of all major governments around the world. This plan involves the inevitable collapse and reformation of America into a Third World enclave, a goal that is nearly complete.

As the U.S. destabilizes, we are not escaping the clutches of the Federal Reserve system, only trading out one totalitarian management model for another. It is absolutely vital that the liberty movement in particular fully embrace this reality. If we do not, there will be no obstacle to such a plan's success and no end to the tyrannies of the old world or the new world.

The only way to stop this march towards a new world order is to expose the false paradigm of the East versus West and the fraud of the BRICS as a challenge to globalist power. We must reject the lies of the internationalists and their puppet politicians, and stand for true sovereignty, freedom, and decentralization of power. The globalists are not invincible, and their plan can be stopped if enough people rise up and resist. The future of humanity depends on it.

---

How you can support my writing

• Restack, like and share this post via email, text, and social media

• Tip me a bug-free meal with Ko-Fi

• Buy a discount subscription

Thank you; your support keeps me writing and helps me pay the bills. 🧡