The Great Reset's Stealthy Dance with Destruction

The War in Ukraine is a Convenient Catalyst for Advancing the Agenda

The pandemic made the world accustomed to lockdowns, fostered widespread approval of experimental treatments, sparked a massive shift of wealth towards corporations by devastating small and medium enterprises, and reshaped workforce dynamics anticipating a cybernetic future. Yet, to hasten the economic downturn before nations could implement 'Build Back Better' strategies, an additional catalyst was needed.

The current conflict between Russia and Ukraine functions as the next impetus for the World Economic Forum's Great Reset plan. This is made possible through a complex web of interconnected global players and an expansive network of mutually beneficial public-private partnerships.

This article is free, and so are most. However, the creation of these in-depth articles is a time-consuming process, involving rigorous research, analysis, and thoughtful writing.

By choosing to become a premium subscriber, you become a pivotal player in this process, enabling the continuation of quality, independent journalism that truly matters. Your subscription not only affords me the opportunity to dedicate my time to creating more thought-provoking pieces, but it also guarantees that this platform remains a sanctuary free from external influences and advertisements.

Your support signifies much more than a mere transaction—it is a testament to our shared belief in the power of knowledge, transparency, and unadulterated information. Let's uphold these values together, with you as a valued subscriber, supporting the production and dissemination of insightful content.

THE BIGGEST JOB DISPLACEMENT IN HISTORY

As geopolitical strains evolve into an enduring clash between NATO and the Sino-Russian alliance, a second economic downturn could thrust the economy into stagflation.

In the forthcoming years, the cocktail of below-average growth and skyrocketing inflation will coerce a global economic lower class into fragmentary work contracts and low-income roles in a burgeoning gig economy. An additional recession will exacerbate the worldwide demand for resources, constrict opportunities for self-reliance, and heighten reliance on government assistance considerably.

With the prospect of impoverishment for a significant fraction of the global workforce looming, this could be a precursor to the implementation of a Universal Basic Income, ushering in a starkly stratified neo-feudal society. Thus, the World Economic Forum's unsettling forecast that by 2030 we will 'own nothing and be happy' appears to be unravelling with terrifying speed.

The designers of the Great Reset have been forecasting this trend for several years, and plan to harness this economic instability by elevating the role of disruptive technologies in tackling global problems and radically reshaping conventional business models to stay abreast with swift technological advancements.

Much like the pandemic, readiness for disasters in this era of conflict will largely depend on the readiness to adopt certain technological advancements in both public and private sectors, ensuring future generations can meet the labor demands of the Great Reset.

A central motif in Klaus Schwab's Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is the assertion that cutting-edge technological and scientific innovations will transcend the boundaries of our physical world, morphing into integral components of our own being.

Schwab underscores the critical importance of emerging technologies for the workforce of the next generation. He accentuates the pressing need to forge ahead with initiatives that aim to digitize vast swathes of the global labour force, harnessing scalable, technology-based solutions. This digitization doesn't only imply the conventional concept of transitioning from analogue to digital formats but encapsulates a broader transformative process.

This process involves the integration of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, blockchain, and other such revolutionary tools into the very fabric of our workplaces. These technologies will not merely supplement human efforts, but redefine jobs and roles, increasing efficiency and potentially creating new opportunities.

Moreover, Schwab envisions a future where these technological extensions of ourselves will influence how we work, communicate, and even think, creating a symbiotic relationship between humans and machines. The very essence of being human might be redefined in this Fourth Industrial Revolution, with an increasing overlap between our physical, digital, and biological identities.

This profound transformation will require a drastic reshaping of our current economic, social, and political systems, highlighting the urgency to progress rapidly with plans to digitize and automate various aspects of the global workforce. It is a vision that underscores the pivotal role of technology not just as a tool but as an integral part of our lives and identities in the ever-evolving landscape of the future.

Those driving the Great Reset aim to navigate geopolitical uncertainties by fostering new markets centered on digital innovations, e-strategies, remote workforces, Artificial Intelligence, robotics, nanotechnology, the Internet of Things (IoT), and the Internet of Bodies.

The lightning-fast deployment of AI technologies indicates that the initial focus of these advancements will be on traditional sectors and professions that currently provide a safety net for hundreds of millions of workers. These sectors include, but are not limited to, agriculture, retail, food services, manufacturing, and delivery industries.

Yet, the advent of automation, through robots, intelligent software, and machine learning, won't merely target jobs characterized by routine, repetitiveness, and predictability.

AI systems stand at the threshold of massively automating several white-collar occupations, especially those involving information processing and pattern recognition, like accounting, human resources, and mid-level managerial roles.

Predicting future employment trends is undoubtedly a formidable task, but the concurrent threats of pandemics and wars suggest that the labour force is on the cusp of an unparalleled transformation. Technology stands poised to revamp logistics, potentially jeopardizing hundreds of millions of jobs across blue and white-collar sectors, heralding the largest and swiftest job displacement in history, and hinting at a labour market shift that was once thought unimaginable.

It's long been forecasted that escalating technology use in the private sector would lead to substantial job losses. However, pandemic-induced lockdowns and impending disruptions stemming from warfare are set to expedite this process. Many companies may find themselves with no alternative but to lay off staff and substitute them with innovative technological solutions merely for business survival.

In essence, many of the jobs that will be lost in the upcoming years were already on a trajectory towards obsolescence, and it's unlikely these roles will be reinstated once a semblance of normalcy is restored.

FUELING THE GREEN TRANSITION AND RISE OF STAKEHOLDER CAPITALISM

Policy architects in step with the Great Reset have exploited the stringent sanctions against Russia, fast-tracking the transition towards 'green' energy and underscoring the significance of decarbonization in the 'battle against climate change'.

However, it would be narrow-minded to presume that the ultimate goal of the Great Reset is a fair distribution of 'green' hydrogen and carbon-neutral synthetic fuels as alternatives to petrol and diesel.

While UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) play a pivotal role in the recovery from the pandemic, they are even more critical in the overhaul of shareholder capitalism, which the Davos luminaries are now championing as 'stakeholder capitalism'.

Economically speaking, this points to a system where governments no longer hold the ultimate authority over state policies, with unelected private corporations assuming the role of society's de facto guardians. These corporations take direct responsibility for addressing global social, economic, and environmental issues through macroeconomic collaboration and a multi-stakeholder model of global governance.

Within such an economic framework, asset-owning conglomerates have the power to reroute the flow of global capital. They can do this by aligning investments with the UN's SDGs and structuring them to be compliant with Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) standards. This allows for the creation of new international markets, built on the disaster and despair of potentially hundreds of millions of people grappling with the economic downfall brought about by war.

Consequently, the war provides a significant momentum for the governments promoting the reset to vigorously strive for energy independence, steer markets towards 'green and inclusive growth,' and gradually transition populations towards a cap-and-trade system, otherwise referred to as a carbon credit economy.

This will concentrate power in the hands of stakeholder capitalists under the seemingly benevolent pretext of revamping capitalism through more equitable and eco-friendly measures. They will employ misleading slogans like 'Build Back Better' while not forgoing the relentless growth imperative that is fundamental to capitalism.

A NEW DAWN FOR 'BIO-AGRICULTURE' AND SYNTHETIC PROTEINS

The food scarcities triggered by the war will serve as a significant windfall for the synthetic biology industry. The fusion of digital technologies with materials science and biology will dramatically revolutionize the agricultural sector, spurring global acceptance of plant-based and laboratory-cultivated alternatives.

Russia and Ukraine, recognized as the world's bread baskets, play an essential role in supplying grains, fertilizers, vegetable oils, and other critical foodstuffs. Any major shortages caused by the ongoing conflict will significantly elevate the importance of biotechnology in maintaining food security and sustainability. As a result, we can anticipate the birth of numerous imitation meat start-ups, mirroring the model of Impossible Foods, which counts Bill Gates among its co-founders.

This situation will likely trigger increased government regulation, pushing for a radical transformation in industrial food production and cultivation methods. This change won't merely impact the industry's landscape, but will also prove lucrative for investors in agribusiness and biotechnology. The reason is that food systems will undergo redesign, leveraging emerging technologies to cultivate 'sustainable' proteins and crops modified with CRISPR gene-editing techniques. These crops will be patented, effectively turning them into sources of steady revenue.

In this reshaped agricultural landscape, companies may no longer rely on traditional farming practices. Instead, they will look to advanced technologies that can increase crop yields, reduce resource wastage, and address the issue of climate change, while maintaining, if not improving, the nutritional content of the crops. Furthermore, in this world where biotechnology holds sway, traditional animal farming could become increasingly replaced by lab-grown meats and plant-based alternatives.

ECONOMIC RESET AND CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCIES ON THE HORIZON

The banishment of Russia from SWIFT (The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) hints at an impending economic reset, creating the very turbulence required to steer a significant segment of the global populace into a tightly regulated, technology-driven system.

Numerous economists have suggested that the act of weaponizing SWIFT, CHIPS (The Clearing House Interbank Payments System), and the US Dollar against Russia is likely to push geopolitical adversaries, such as China, to expedite the process of de-dollarization.

The principal beneficiary of the economic sanctions against Russia seems to be China. It has the potential to restructure the Eurasian market by persuading member nations of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and BRICS to sidestep the SWIFT ecosystem, choosing instead to settle cross-border international transactions in the Digital Yuan.

The surge in demand for cryptocurrencies is expected to prompt governments to exert more control over this sector, mainly through public blockchains. There may even be a collaborative international effort to ban decentralized cryptocurrencies.

This shift towards crypto could serve as a precursor, fast-tracking plans for programmable money managed by a centralized authority. This change could consolidate power even further in the hands of a potent global technocracy, thereby deepening our dependence on financial institutions.

I predict that this war will bring about currency parity, marking a new Bretton Woods moment. Such a turning point could profoundly transform the workings of international banking and macroeconomic cooperation, especially through the future adoption of central bank digital currencies.

SHAPING GLOBAL HEGEMONY AND THE SHIFT TOWARDS MULTIPOLARITY

In an influential proclamation made over a century ago, Halford Mackinder, widely regarded as the 'father of geopolitics,' profoundly asserted that the ascent of every global dominator throughout the last 500 years hinged upon their mastery over Eurasia. Likewise, the waning of their supremacy was inherently linked to their relinquishment of control over this pivotal landmass.

This intricate relationship between geography and power has not escaped the notice of the global constellation of stakeholders affiliated with the World Economic Forum (WEF). Many among them have long foreseen the impending shift towards a multipolar era, accompanied by a resurgence in intense rivalries among major powers. This transition is being spurred on by America's receding political and economic influence, prompting a compelling necessity for what experts refer to as "smart globalization."

Amidst America's fervent efforts to cling to its superpower status, the rapid economic rise of China and the regional ambitions of Russia loom as formidable threats to the strategic focal points of Eurasia, namely Western Europe and the Asia Pacific.

The region that was once unquestionably dominated by the United States now bears visible cracks, and we may be witnessing a profound shift in the global balance of power, one that significantly impacts the calculation of force projection worldwide.

China's ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), with its potential to unite the vast expanse of the world-island encompassing Asia, Africa, and Europe, possesses the capability to bring about a seismic transformation in the center of global power. However, the recent invasion of Ukraine will undoubtedly have far-reaching consequences, particularly in terms of China-Europe rail freight and its implications.

Ukrainian President Zelensky has put forth the claim that Ukraine could potentially serve as the gateway to Europe for the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). This assertion highlights the significant stake that China holds in the recent tensions surrounding Ukraine. Likewise, it is crucial not to overlook NATO's underlying ambition to counter China's ascent in the region, manifested through efforts to limit the sale of Ukrainian assets to China and employing all available means to impede the progress of the Modern Silk Road.

As sanctions are aimed to exerting pressure on Russia, pushing it toward solidifying bilateral ties with China and fully embracing the BRI, the possibility of a Pan-Eurasian trading bloc emerges. Such a realignment could give rise to shared governance of the global commons and potentially serve as a reset from the era of US exceptionalism.

ISRAEL'S TECH POWER

As speculation intensifies regarding the enduring effects of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on trade relations between China and Europe, this geopolitical turmoil will propel Israel, a staunch proponent of the Great Reset, to an even more significant position on the global stage.

China recognizes Israel as an immensely attractive market within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), acknowledging Israel's crucial role as a strategic outpost that links the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea via the Gulf of Suez. The Chinese government has long acknowledged Israel's prominence as a global technology hub and has actively leveraged Israel's innovative capabilities to address its own strategic challenges.

Israel's position as a leading tech hub of the future and a gateway that connects Europe and the Middle East is closely intertwined with the physical infrastructure network constructed by China over the past decade. This network encompasses roads, railways, ports, and energy pipelines, forming a web that fortifies Israel's significance in the region.

Israel, already a formidable force in auto-technologies, robotics, and cybersecurity, holds aspirations of becoming a central nation in the millennial Kingdom. The country's vibrant tech startup ecosystem is anticipated to play a pivotal role in driving the fourth industrial revolution.

Amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine crisis, bolstering its evolving ties with China could serve as a catalyst to elevate Israel to a regional hegemonic power. In this scenario, Jerusalem would emerge as a hub for concentrated economic and technological might, positioning Israel as an unparalleled force in the region.

As Israel endeavors to diversify its export markets and investments, seeking avenues beyond the United States, a significant question arises: Is Israel at the nascent stage of shifting its security interests away from the US and hedging its bets on the Sino-Russia axis?

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CONTROL

The integration of Digital IDs as a key element of the World Economic Forum's Great Reset agenda has become widely recognized. These IDs are expected to be implemented across various industries, supply chains, and markets, serving as a means to advance the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and provide personalized and integrated services in the future smart cities.

There is growing awareness of how such a platform can be utilized to establish a global system of technocratic control and conformity. It envisions a new corporate value chain in which individuals are treated as data commodities, mined for the benefit of ESG investors and human capital bond markets. This system assigns individuals a social and climate score based on their alignment with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Achieving seamless verification of individuals and connected devices within smart environments requires the consolidation of biometric data, health records, financial information, education transcripts, consumer behavior, carbon footprint, and the entirety of human experiences. These data points would be stored in an interoperable database, determining individuals' compliance with the UN SDGs and inevitably leading to a significant transformation of our social contract.

As the initial focus on vaccine passports for Digital IDs has reached its limits, the current geopolitical tensions have the potential to accelerate the scaling of a pivotal element in the emerging digital ecosystem.

Considering Ukraine's historical role as Europe's breadbasket and the significant grain supply from both Ukraine and Russia, the ongoing war has the potential to act as an unexpected and disruptive event for commodity markets, potentially leading to inflationary pressures. This situation bears resemblance to a black swan event, introducing unpredictability and volatility to the global economy.

As the global supply shortage pushes economies to the edge of collapse, I foresee a ripple effect of economic turmoil that could lead to widespread wartime emergencies. In such circumstances, the public may be informed of the need for rationing measures to brace themselves for scarcity.

In this context, the widespread implementation of Digital IDs, which interface with Central Bank Digital Currencies, may be presented as a solution for effectively managing and distributing household rations during an extraordinary state of emergency.

The Bank of England has already entertained the idea of programmable cash, which could restrict spending to essential items or goods deemed appropriate by employers or the government. This concept aims to ensure responsible and controlled use of funds during critical times.

In a future scenario where issuers have the authority to determine how funds are spent by recipients, possessing a Digital ID will become increasingly essential for basic subsistence, akin to the concept of Universal Basic Income (UBI). Digital IDs will likely be required to receive food parcels and access fundamental means of survival.

If the trend of rising food inflation persists without respite, governments might introduce price controls in the form of rationing. Blockchain ledgers on Digital IDs could be utilized to record ration entries, enabling the tracking of individuals' carbon footprint and consumption patterns during times of national emergencies.

CYBER ATTACKS, NUCLEAR THREATS, AND THE PERCEIVED URGENCY FOR ENHANCED SECURITY MEASURES

To overlook the imminent threats of a cyber attack targeting banks and critical infrastructure, or even the possibility of a tactical nuclear exchange involving intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), would be a grave oversight.

It is crucial to acknowledge that the doctrine of mutually assured destruction would likely curtail the actions of warring parties, making a thermonuclear fallout improbable.

However, the utilization of remote access technologies to wipe out system memory from vital financial systems like SWIFT banking apparatus or Cross-Border Interbank Payment System has the potential to bring a significant portion of the global economy to a standstill and trigger an even severer decline in the value of the dollar.

In the event of such a catastrophic incident, there would undoubtedly be escalating calls for a comprehensive revamp of cyber security measures. The aftermath of such an event could potentially usher in a new global security protocol, mandating the possession of a Digital ID as an essential national security requirement for citizens.

One can envision a scenario where accessing the internet or utilizing public services following a large-scale cyber attack necessitates the use of a Digital ID. This would serve as a means to authenticate the legitimacy and non-malicious nature of individuals' online activities and transactions.

It is worth noting that there are rarely coincidences in the realm of politics.

RESHAPING POWER DYNAMICS

The economic repercussions of this conflict are projected to be so catastrophic that governments and the public sector will necessitate substantial private capital infusion to bridge the financing gap.

Consequently, the longstanding division of powers between central banking institutions and governments will become obsolete, as the former gain disproportionate influence over the fiscal direction of nation states. This capturing of governments by central banks and hedge funds will erode national sovereignty, hollowing out its essence.

Hence, the established nation-state paradigm is gradually undergoing a seismic shift as a global technocracy takes shape. This technocracy comprises an unelected alliance of influential industry leaders, oligarchs from central banking institutions, and powerful private financial entities, many of which operate outside the traditional realm of sovereign states. They aim to restructure global governance and assert their authority within the global decision-making process.

Consequently, the future of international relations and the ongoing social, economic, and political transformations spurred by the pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict will not be determined by traditional multilateralism or the elected representatives of sovereign states. Instead, it will be shaped by a complex network of multi-stakeholder partnerships driven by political expediency. These entities remain unaccountable to any electorate and are detached from the notion of statehood, rendering concepts such as sovereignty and international law increasingly obsolete.

In this emerging landscape, the balance of power and the trajectory of global affairs will be heavily influenced by non-state actors who prioritize their own interests over the welfare and aspirations of individual nations. The implications of this shift in global governance pose significant challenges to established systems of democratic representation and raise critical questions about the accountability and legitimacy of decision-making processes on the global stage.

---

As we witness the ascendancy of this global technocracy, the implications extend beyond the traditional realm of politics. It permeates economic structures, social dynamics, and the very fabric of our daily lives. The concentration of power in the hands of unelected and unaccountable entities introduces a new paradigm, where decisions are made based on the interests of a select few rather than the collective will of the people.

This departure from the principles of representative governance and the erosion of sovereign authority raise concerns about the future trajectory of our societies. As non-state actors exert influence over global affairs, the notion of a level playing field diminishes, and marginalized voices are further marginalized.

Furthermore, the erosion of sovereignty and the dismissal of international law undermine the very foundations of a rules-based international order. Cooperation between nations based on mutual respect and shared values gives way to a system driven by self-interest and expediency. The consequences of this shift are far-reaching, affecting not only states but also individuals, communities, and the global community as a whole.

It is essential to critically examine the implications of this emerging global technocracy and engage in meaningful discussions about the future we want to create. How can we strike a balance between the benefits of technological advancements and the preservation of democratic principles? How can we ensure that power remains accountable and serves the collective interests of humanity rather than a select few?

These questions require our attention and proactive commitment to shape a future that upholds the values of transparency, inclusivity, and accountability. Only by actively participating in the conversations and decisions that shape our world can we strive for a more equitable and just global order, where sovereignty, democracy, and the well-being of individuals and communities are upheld.

---

Have you found these insights valuable and compelling? If so, consider elevating your experience by becoming a paid subscriber. Doing so will grant you access to an even deeper exploration of various engaging topics.

If a paid subscription doesn't align with your current preferences but you still want to extend your support, you have the option to donate any amount that suits you. Your generous contribution, no matter how small, would be greatly appreciated as it helps maintain the breadth and quality of content, most of which remains freely accessible. A heartfelt thank you in advance!

If financial contributions aren't viable at this time, you can still lend your support by simply leaving a 'like'. This simple act carries no cost to you but helps enhance the visibility of this post, benefiting many others. Your engagement is deeply valued. Thank you! :)