The West is sleepwalking into a slaughterhouse of its own making, grinning with the delusion of moral superiority as the executioner’s sharpens his Scimitar. Our civilization is hemorrhaging, gutted by a craven infatuation with Islam, a totalitarian ideology masquerading as faith, relentless in its 1,400-year crusade to conquer and crush. Hold on to your delusion that it is only Western foreign policies and the CIA that breed Islamic extremism if you like, but you are an idiot for believing this Muslim sob story. History has a harsh awakening for you, screaming warnings, and you’re deaf, adorning your decline with platitudes of “tolerance” while barbarians are openly killing and raping on your streets without having to fear any repercussions.
Recently, some sanctimonious, pro-Palestine, “woke right-wing” virtuecrat had the nerve to lose it at me when he realized I don’t give a damn about his precious people in Palestine. This self-proclaimed intellectual had the gall to ask if I’d be okay with homosexuals losing rights (like the Palestinians), as if this was some clever gotcha tying me to their cause. It’s an utterly brain-dead question, considering the very people he’s tripping over himself to defend would likely execute me for being a lesbian before he could blink. In my world, that is the ultimate right to lose, but apparently, being killed is just a minor detail in this warped moral calculus. The mental acrobatics this clown performs to act shocked that I oppose Muslim culture in it’s entirety are nothing short of staggering. It’s a pathetic display of ideological contortionism.
My stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is simple: I couldn’t care less about who claims they owned the dirt first or about Israel’s flag-waving statehood, and the issue of Israeli surveillance undermining American liberties is a topic that exists separated from that conflict. My fight is with those who take a stand against the toxic spread of Islam. It’s a jihadist death cult. In Sharia-governed states like Iran, Saudi Arabia, or Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, my homosexuality is a capital offense—punished by hanging, stoning, or defenestration. No, you will never find me saying a single positive word about the festering cancer originating from the Middle East.
Quranic verses like Surah 7:80-84, recounting the destruction of Lot’s people for “indecent acts,” are wielded to justify these purges. If Islam’s influence spreads unchecked in the West—through migration, cultural concessions, or political appeasement—the freedoms we’ve bled for will crumble. We already see the rot: honor killings in immigrant enclaves and “no-go zones” where Sharia’s shadow enforces medieval norms on modern streets. Another state under Islamic rule is no beacon of progress but another theocratic prison, for a rotting cancer to grow, organize and spread from.
Reducing such countries isn’t a loss for humanity; it’s a strategic gain for liberty, starving the beast of radical ideology. Enabling Islamism anywhere threatens freedom everywhere, and as a gay woman, I refuse to grovel for approval from those who’d cheer my execution. If that makes me the villain in their utopian narrative, so be it—survival trumps their sanctimonious posturing.
This person’s braindead statement is a symptom of a malignancy devouring the West’s soul: Islamophobia-phobia, a paralyzing dread of being labeled intolerant for critiquing Islam’s core. This cowardice has metastasized into Islamophilia—a grotesque adoration of a medieval ideology built on conquest, subjugation, hate and actual racism.
The term “Islamophobia” has been hijacked, twisted from a shield against prejudice toward Muslims into a bludgeon against any scrutiny of Islamic doctrine, equated with “anti-Muslim racism.” Religion is not race; it’s a system of ideas, and Islam’s obsession with submission, martyrdom, and dominion over non-believers—particularly women—demands relentless dissection, not coddling.
Academics, politicians, and journalists tremble at the prospect of ostracism, branded as provocateurs for stating truths. It’s a scene from Max Frisch’s Biedermann and the Arsonists: the West as a naive fool, inviting pyromaniacs into its home and applauding as they light the match. Most Muslims aren’t terrorists in the classical sense, but Islam’s foundational texts breed violence, glorifying martyrs and warlords who view infidels as prey. Give them fertile soil and they will happily join the Jihad. To deny this is to whistle past history’s blood-soaked pages.
Consider the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (1990), endorsed by 56 OIC states. It subordinates every right to Sharia, mocking the 1948 Universal Declaration’s universal freedoms. Iran’s execution toll—834 in 2023, 975 in 2024, 343 in 2025’s first four months, per Amnesty International and UN reports—targets dissenters, homosexuals, and nonconformists.
Yet Western leaders kneel. Germany’s Wolfgang Schäuble, at the 2006 German Islam Conference, declared, “Islam is part of Germany and Europe.” Utter nonsense—it never was, never will be. Christian Wulff, on German Unity Day 2010, echoed, “Islam belongs to Germany”. Angela Merkel’s 2015 border policy welcomed over a million migrants, many from Muslim-majority nations, without vetting, amplifying the crisis. By 2017, Thomas de Maizière proposed a Muslim public holiday, normalizing Sharia’s creep. The West handing its enemies the keys to its own destruction.
The Gulf States—Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar—exemplify this betrayal, their sycophantic alliance with the West greased by oil wealth and moral cowardice. Under the kafala system, a visa becomes a chain: sponsors seize passports, wages, and silence, enforcing servitude under Sharia’s whip. Attempt escape, and you’re lashed or buried in a ditch. The supply chain preys on the desperate—a Filipina chasing Bangkok job ads, a Romanian teen lured by Dubai modeling gigs—only to land in villa basements, auctioned to sheikhs bidding cash per night. UN data confirms 150,000 Filipinas vanish annually; 500 Romanian teens disappeared last year alone; 70,000 Sri Lankan maids never return. Their fate? “Temporary marriage,” sanctified by Quranic verse 4:24, allowing men to “enjoy what your right hand possesses.” Classical jurists and modern Gulf imams endorse it; courts seal the deal. Children—five percent minors from Ukraine, Thailand, India—are flown on Emirates A380s that operate on otherwise unprofitable routes, to be then sold as stock, numbered and priced. This form of modern slavery is woven into Sharia’s fabric, scaled to industrial horror by Gulf wealth. The West, addicted to oil, stays silent—Hollywood collared by emirati cash, UN budgets choked by the same donors who bankroll these chains. No boycotts, no exposés, just a steady stream of girls whose passports vanish into the desert.
The Mirage of “Liberal” Islam: A Delusion for Naive Dreamers
The West clings to fantasies of Islam’s “tolerant” past, like medieval Spain’s “Golden Age,” where Muslims, Christians, and Jews supposedly coexisted in harmony. This is historical fiction. Early Umayyad rulers permitted Christians and Jews to exist as dhimmis—taxed, subservient second-class citizens. By the late 11th century, Almoravids and Almohads unleashed forced conversions, expulsions, and massacres. “Skull minarets” built from Christian heads demolish the “religion of peace” myth.
The West’s hope of reforming Islam into a liberal, “Euro-Islam” is arrogant folly, presuming we can domesticate a force that’s devoured developed civilizations for centuries. Bassam Tibi, a Syrian Muslim scholar, championed Euro-Islam in his 2009 book, envisioning secular compatibility. By 2017, he recanted, citing Islam’s entrenched antisemitism and patriarchal rigidity as insurmountable. Migrants exploit Western benefits while rejecting its values, pursuing da’wa—proselytization—as a tool for Islamization. Tibi’s conclusion: Western leniency invites contempt.
An “enlightened Islam” is a contradiction in terms. Reformers like Imad Karim (Lebanese filmmaker), Necla Kelek (Turkish-German sociologist), Hamed Abdel-Samad (Egyptian-German author of Islamic Fascism), and Seyran Ateş (founder of Berlin’s liberal Ibn Rushd-Goethe Mosque, living under constant security due to threats) face death for their efforts. Holocaust survivor Ralph Giordano called Islamization “cowardice” rather than enrichment. Samuel P. Huntington’s 1996 The Clash of Civilizations warned of Islam’s “resurgence” without reformation, akin to Marxism’s unyielding revival. Islam’s core resists liberty, and pretending otherwise is a prelude to annihilation.
Islam’s 7th-century conquests were a wrecking ball that reduced Middle Eastern high cultures to ruins under a totalitarian creed. The Sasanian Persian Empire, 632-654 CE, saw its Zoroastrian heritage crushed, locals coerced into Arab supremacy, and Greco-Roman influences severed at swordpoint. Egypt, invaded in 641 CE at the height of its cultural decadence, lost its pharaonic, Hellenistic, and Coptic legacy to jizya taxes, forced conversions, looted artifacts, and enslaved populations, its Coptic identity eroded forever. Once the Mediterranean’s intellectual epicenter, it became a Sharia backwater, libraries burned, knowledge shackled to Quranic dogma. The Levant and Mesopotamia—Assyrian, Babylonian, Phoenician cultures—were sacked, enslaved, and smothered under Arab monolithism.
Islam didn’t preserve knowledge; it appropriated scraps and suffocated the rest, ensuring no renaissance could challenge its dominion. This legacy of cultural obliteration persists, a grim testament to Islam’s incompatibility with pluralistic flourishing. The West gazes at these ruins and deludes itself: “It won’t happen to us.” History begs to differ.
1001 Gestures of Submission
Angela Merkel’s reckless open-door policy unleashed a Muslim invasion of the West, with Germany as ground zero. In 2015, a Syrian girl’s tears on a talk show, after Merkel’s hollow but surprisingly realistic “we can’t take them all.” A week later unchecked migration began. Germany’s spineless refusal to confront radical Islam isn’t tolerance or some noble “Never Again” gesture—it’s betrayal. It screws over not just Westerners and Jews, who face rising anti-Semitism, but the moderate Muslims who left their countries in the ‘70s and ‘80s, integrated, and built lives here. Worst of all, it’s a vile betrayal of countless women, Middle Eastern Christians, and other religious minorities who escaped Sharia’s horrors, only to face them creeping back in their new homes.
2023 German Police Crime Statistics: 42% of suspects were non-citizens, despite comprising 17% of the population, a trend holding through 2024 and into 2025—don’t you dare to say it out loud though. Islamism dominates extremist threats, with 476 prosecutorial cases in 2023 compared to 29 for right-wing extremism and 3 for left-wing. The 2024 Report on the Protection of the Constitution flagged ongoing Islamist antisemitic spikes, with 99 left-wing antisemitic offenses as a footnote. In 2025, protests in Berlin and Düsseldorf glorify Syria’s jihadist regime, while state countermeasures and mosque moderation efforts achieve nothing.
The west is destroying itself in 1001 gestures of submission. Child marriages, female genital mutilation (thousands annually in migrant communities, per Terre des Femmes), honor killings (underreported but documented), consanguineous marriages (now a health benefit according to the NHS), forced unions, and polygamy persist despite legal bans. In schools, patriarchal norms reign: boys disregard female teachers, demand gender-segregated activities, and seek exemptions for Muslim girls from swimming or sports. Actual feminist responses are muted. Asylum policies allow secondary spouses to bypass bigamy laws. Berlin’s 100+ documented child marriages? Aydan Özoğuz, German Social Democrats’ former Integration Commissioner, argues against annulment to preserve inheritance rights, prioritizing cultural appeasement over child welfare.
Cultural concessions abound: children fasting during Ramadan despite health risks, rising knife crime among migrant youth, amplified muezzin calls. Christmas markets are rebranded “light markets,” Easter as “bunny festivals,” St. Martin’s processions as “light parades.” Pork vanishes from public canteens, Christian songs are banned in schools, and activities halt during Ramadan. In 2024, Cologne and Frankfurt illuminated streets for Ramadan, while swimming pools reserved women-only hours among rising rape cases. Arabic tourism brochures omit summit crosses, and cemeteries consider segregated sections. The West is dismantling its identity to placate an ideology of barbaric cockroaches.
Antisemitism festers openly: Israeli flags burned, shop signs proclaiming “Jews not welcome” (yet “not for antisemitic reasons”—of course), Muslim-printed pamphlets targeting “Israel-supporting” businesses. Post-October 7, 2023, universities label Israel’s defense “genocide,” chanting “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”—Jordan to Mediterranean, no Jews permitted. Karl Lagerfeld’s 2017 warning on French TV: “We cannot kill millions of Jews, say ‘never again’, and then bring millions of their worst enemies into the country.” He saw it coming.
Adolf Hitler admired Islam’s martial zeal. In Hitler’s Table Talk (no, that’s not Candace Owen’s new talkshow), he praised “Mohammedanism” for its warrior ethos, lamenting Christianity’s softening of Germanic resolve. From 1933, Nazis courted Arab nationalists; by 1937-38, they expunged anti-Arab passages from Arabic editions of Mein Kampf. In 2023 Gaza operations, Israeli forces uncovered Hitler imagery, underscoring fascist-Islamist ties. Ex-Muslim activist Sabatina James argues that atrocities align with Islamic texts, not aberrations. Elias Canetti, in Crowds and Power (1960), labeled Islam a “war religion.” Navid Kermani, 2015 Peace Prize recipient, noted its proximity to fascism. The Arab role in trans-Saharan slavery—millions over centuries—is routinely minimized.
Islam isn’t a faith; it’s a metastasizing force, consuming non-Muslims with relentless violence rooted in its death-cult core. In Nigeria, jihadists like Boko Haram have slaughtered over 52,000 Christians since 2009, with 7,087 killed in 2025’s first eight months (nearly 30 daily), per reports. A September 23, 2025, attack razed a Christian village, killing four and burning a church, fueling genocide fears and U.S. calls for sanctions. A priest’s murder intensifies the dread.
In Syria, 2025’s sectarian carnage targeted the Druze: hundreds killed, including 46 extrajudicial executions in Suwayda, per Amnesty International. July saw 600 deaths, 300 Druze (146 fighters, 154 civilians, 83 summarily executed) by Sunni militias backed by government forces. Villages like Ta’ara, Al Doura, and Al Douweira faced artillery, looting, and sexual violence, with over 1,000 total deaths. Videos of unarmed Druze shot point-blank reveal Islam’s intolerance for deviation.
Islam’s core breeds extremism like a festering cancer to humanity, leaving wastelands from Nigeria to Syria, every adherent a potential vector for violence in its quest for global dominion.
Meanwhile, the Left’s alliance with Islam is a calculated betrayal, not ambivalence. Despite their secular posturing, they tolerate Islam for its anti-Western animus and latent antisemitism, shared with “woke” conservatives and fringe right-wing groups. The 1968 generation backed the PLO over Israel. Muslims have replaced the proletariat as the Left’s “oppressed.”
Political scientist Hendrik Hansen identifies a “new alliance of left-wing extremism and Islamism,” evident in the BDS movement’s antisemitic boycott of Israel. Samuel Schirmbeck critiques the Left’s “taboo culture” avoiding Islam’s scrutiny.
Islam/Islamism—undifferentiated in Arabic—mirrors totalitarian ideologies like Communism and Nazism: expansionist salvation doctrines, promising liberation from exploiters or unbelievers, demanding individual sacrifice for collective goals. Communism’s class struggle parallels Islam’s “faith struggle”; the classless society mirrors Dar al-Islam; comrades versus enemies aligns with believers versus infidels.
Progressives, driven by Jew-hatred masked as anti-Zionism, ally with Islamists whose charters demand Jewish extermination. The Heritage Foundation’s Project Esther (2024-2025) labels the “pro-Palestinian” movement a “Hamas Support Network,” laundering antisemitism through “global intifada” calls. Blinded by post-Holocaust guilt, progressives side with forces that would stone their queer allies, veil their feminist comrades, and erase their cultural heritage. It’s suicide, trading Jewish survival for applause from those chanting “Khaybar, Khaybar, ya Yahud,” invoking medieval Jewish massacres. The Quran’s Surah 5:51 forbids alliances with Jews and Christians; progressives comply, despising their own so fiercely they embrace freedom’s rapists.
In Britain, 2025 is a cauldron of Islamist-fueled antisemitism tied to Gaza protests. The Community Security Trust recorded 1,521 antisemitic incidents in the first half of 2025—over 200 monthly—spiked by Al-Quds Day marches brandishing Hezbollah flags and blood-libel caricatures. A June 2025 Counter Extremism Project report provided “persuasive evidence” linking Islamist extremism to antisemitism via mosque sermons and Holocaust-denial networks. Swastikas deface music festivals, assaults plague streets, and integration falters amid Rotherham and Oldham grooming gang scandals, shielded by “Islamophobia” fears. Sharia councils operate parallel to civil law, disadvantaging women, while protests glorify Iran’s execution surge.
Of course, Islamophilia chokes the West across the Atlantic. In America, the picture is fragmented but dire. Dearborn, Michigan—“America’s Jihad Capital”—festers. At ArabCon 2025, speakers defended Hamas’s October 7 rampage. Mayor Abdullah Hammoud’s September 2025 ban of a Christian critic for opposing a street named for Hezbollah-Hamas advocate Osama Siblani sparked free-speech battles. The August 2025 Arbaeen March, the largest outside Iraq, saw pro-Iran banners, alarming Jewish communities. 2024’s “Death to America, Death to Israel” chants at anti-Israel rallies—prompting Republican calls for FBI probes—persist into 2025.
Islam is no benign faith but a supremacist ideology clashing with democracy, its “tolerance” a myth sustained by Western denial. Progressives, especially those whose Jew-hatred trumps survival, enable it, romanticizing “resistance” while ignoring Tehran’s executions or Gaza’s rape tunnels. It’s a betrayal born of ideological delirium, blinding them to the noose tightening on liberty.
It is important to realize that “multiculturalism” is inherently opposed to any civilization. The “multi”-cultural dreamers’ repressed fundamental issue is this: They pretend that “multiculturalism” would function flawlessly if only the majority society were sufficiently open to integrating “new citizens.” However, “new citizens” must assimilate, or adapt, in order for diversity to even moderately succeed. The opposite is not true.
If not, immigrants believe they can create alternative communities and disregard existing laws and customs. Destabilizing the nation-state is the fundamental ideological goal of embracing any minority’s cultural identity. The idea that all civilizations are really variations of a single global civilization is the basis for this universalism.
It is an act of egalitarian nihilism rather than respect to accept all conceivable cultural manifestations as equally valid (or indifferent?). When the majority society accepts anything that is not subject to the rule of law and human rights, like child marriages or genital mutilation, it is nothing more than cultural relativism, or even cultural nihilism. One may refer to this as the so-called “liberal” and “pluralistic” cultural sensitivity or an idealization of the foreign.
Tribalism, where tribes set their own standards, is encouraged by such tolerance, which atomizes a community. However, a prerequisite for a group’s existence is its readiness to prioritize its own customs and standards over those of a foreign group.
Despite the fact that there is no legal right to immigrate, the movement toward “multiculturalism” appears to have gained momentum despite asylum laws. The ridiculousness is that the sovereign was never questioned about whether they wanted “multiculturalism,” millions of uncontrolled immigrants, or the total dismantling of asylum laws as a free entry point for any number of immigrants.
“The multiculturalism approach has failed, utterly failed!” may have been a daring statement made years ago by the so-called “bourgeois” political groups, but it was actually the bold statement made by then-Chancellor Merkel, five years prior to her open-border policy.
The downfall of the West is foretold in two French books. A million Hindus are shown arriving on the French coast in rusting ships as a wave of pandemonium in Jean Raspail’s 1973 painting The Camp of the Saints. Western culture burns, elites fly north, the media rejoices, the people drowns in humanitarian self-loathing, and anarchy engulfs the south. In Paris, “multicultural committees” are established, and the establishment adjusts to being erased.
In Submission (2015), published on the day of the Charlie Hebdo tragedy, Michel Houellebecq imagines a France in 2022 in which Mohamed Ben Abbes of the Muslim Brotherhood, supported by conservatives and socialists, defeats Marine Le Pen’s Front National to become president. A civil conflict breaks out, the media remains silent, and Abbes rejects secularism and imposes Sharia, polygamy, and patriarchy.
In order to benefit from a lucrative career and obedient young friends, the main character, François, a literary professor, converts to Islam. A society rife with loneliness, porn addiction, and the constant desire to satiate the brain’s dopamine craving with ever-more-reprehensible acts of sexual dominance is already providing fertile ground for this future. You have been warned.
How you can support my writing:
Restack, like and share this post via email, text, and social media
Thank you; your support keeps me writing and helps me pay the bills. 🧡