Discover more from A Lily Bit
WEF admits that Covid-19 was used as a trial to test your compliance
An Agenda Contributor says the quiet part out loud
There are many things the WEF may be accused of, but none of them is not being transparent about its agenda. All the rumors about the World Economic Forum's future intentions were confirmed by a piece that was posted on its website on September 14: They are no longer hiding the fact that Covid-19 was given permission to operate as a trial run for a much bigger project. People's submission has been demonstrated in the context of the "pandemic," and this is now to be built upon ruthlessly.
I expect a certain someone to soon again come to the rescue and ensure that this article has purposely been misinterpreted by conspiracy theorists or that this piece does not reflect the opinion of the WEF — although everyone who writes for the WEF is clearly named an “Agenda Contributor” on their website.
A Lily Bit is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
People have a tendency to find it difficult to comprehend the eco-socialists' and pseudo-world leaders' proposed reorganization, or "reset," of the economy. But the Corona crisis brought a few changes: It demonstrated how easily the people can be manipulated if enough terror is disseminated, and it made clear that a significant portion of the population truly always obeys orders.
Under the title "My Carbon" the supporters of the WEF are currently promoting enforcing the Great Reset by fixed CO2 limits for citizens. It is important to note that the same profiteers who were responsible for the Corona crisis are fundamentally behind the falsehood about the "climate emergency".
The principle is the same: masses of money are pumped into certain industries—and as a result, (coercive) measures are installed to guarantee a maximum return on investment. What we saw with vaccination passports before is to be CO2 passports in the future. The great advantage of such measures is that they allow comprehensive control and management of the masses—and ultimately also of those who have not yet given up on using their brains and are ready to resist.
COVID-19 AS A WELCOME TEST RUN
The Sept. 14 article honestly notes that CO2 limits have been impossible to implement—due to lack of social acceptance, political resistance and a lack of "awareness" for climate issues. But in the last few years, they say, there have been significant developments that may finally pave the way for "My Carbon" initiatives.
”COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility."
They elaborate further:
“A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility.”
Again, it seems they are peeing themselves in excitement: A massive portion of the population appears to accept "unimaginable" constraints without complaint, as demonstrated by fear-disturbed Corona paranoids and their fellow travelers. For the WEF agenda, this appears to be the starting point for additional constraints and limitations.
HONORING CLIMATE TERRORISTS?
The WEF is also happy about new technological means thanks to digitalization, artificial intelligence and tracking apps that allow monitoring of personal CO2 emissions. In addition, they love that people's awareness of the claimed climate emergency has grown significantly. Young climate protesters are praised at this point. In the UK or in Germany, this oh-so-exemplary group of people primarily focuses on criminal acts; the German Federal Criminal Police office recently warned of attacks on energy infrastructure by eco-terrorists.
Fittingly, the WEF cites Germany as the best example of the increase in "very concerned" propaganda victims since 2015, which may well imply that crimes are also approved for as long as they serve the agenda. To ensure that criminal eco-fascists are constantly growing, the WEF recently recommended that climate alarmism be required as a subject in schools:
“A study from a British university reveals that more than half of young people experience climate anxiety on a daily basis.
The UN is calling for climate education to become compulsory in schools from 2025 to better equip children to cope with global warming in the future.”
THE NEW CO2-NORMAL
Under "What Next" the article elaborates on how CO2 limits are to be enforced—thanks to a corresponding "social movement". Funny: The first point— increasing costs for carbon emitting activities and products, and economic interventions to reduce demand and improve "efficiency"—citizens in Western countries are already experiencing.
The goal here—as with Covid-19—is to create a new "normalcy” by further raising awareness of the desired quasi-carbon ban. Thus, the definition of "fair shares" of personal emissions is to be renewed and "acceptable" levels of emissions are to be defined for everyone, which the citizens are then to dutifully accept. This is probably the point where the WEF succumbs to its megalomania.
That is because, even if the blind obedience regarding the Covid-19 coercion and vaccinations raised doubts about the maturity and thinking ability of your fellow people—many are still waking up to the madness. The panic wore off, the narratives crumbled in the face of reality. Even the majority of citizens in Germany, a pandemic policy ghost driver, are fed up with any kind of restrictions because of a cold. The war in Ukraine has already shown that many people have become more suspicious as a result of the Corona crisis and are increasingly questioning the official narratives—and now that the German government, among others, is driving the population into poverty and deprivation, the general willingness to comply with personal CO2 limits will tend towards zero. In the end, it is still the citizens who decide what they will and will not participate in.
I thoroughly enjoy putting my heart and soul into A Lily Bit. Although almost all of my articles are free to read, doing the research and writing takes a lot of my time, effort, and even money. With an annual subscription, you may get full access for just $7 a month or save a few dollars on an annual subscription. You can donate an annual amount that you choose if you want to support A Lily Bit in particular. This enables me to improve A Lily Bit and create even more content for you.