A Lily Bit

A Lily Bit

Share this post

A Lily Bit
A Lily Bit
Who Implements the World Economic Forum's Agenda?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Who Implements the World Economic Forum's Agenda?

We Know Who's Calling the Shots, Now it's Time to Look at Who's Executing Them.

Jul 23, 2024
∙ Paid
50

Share this post

A Lily Bit
A Lily Bit
Who Implements the World Economic Forum's Agenda?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
13
18
Share
Upgrade to paid to play voiceover

The notion of a global government orchestrated by the world's financial and political elites has been unjustly dismissed as a “conspiracy theory” by the mainstream media and the establishment. Even when presented with irrefutable evidence of collusion between banking institutions and politicians, many individuals still balk at the prospect of a one-world empire. It is beyond their comprehension.

Skeptics will argue that the establishment is motivated solely by greed, and that their alliances are tenuous and based solely on self-interest. They will claim that crisis events and shifts in social and political trends are haphazard, not the result of deliberate manipulation. They will assert that elitists, being too self-absorbed, will never be able to collaborate towards a common goal. These views, however, are naive and misguided.

A Lily Bit is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The so-called “New World Order” is a convenient euphemism for those in power to gently introduce the idea of global governance to the masses. It's a sedative, a way to soften the blow of the harsh reality that a select few hold the reins of our world. When the wealthy and influential, such as George Soros or Henry Kissinger, speak of this “order,” they do so with a sense of entitlement, a belief that they have the right to shape the future of humanity.

But let's call it what it really is: organized evil. The idea that a small group of individuals can control the fate of billions is not only preposterous but morally reprehensible. Yet, the public clings to the notion that these leaders have their best interests at heart, that they are not capable of such malevolence. This is a coping mechanism, a way to avoid confronting the uncomfortable truth.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to A Lily Bit to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 A Lily Bit
Publisher Terms
Substack
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More