Wrapping Up the “Sound of Freedom” Controversy

Sound of Freedom is a compelling movie based on the true story of Tim Ballard, a government agent who chooses to leave his job to rescue children from sex traffickers in Colombia. Directed by Alejandro Monteverde, the film stands out from typical Hollywood productions with its unique approach. It was released by Angel Studios, a Utah-based company known for specializing in what they call “faith-based” projects.

The movie was actually completed over five years ago, in 2018, and was initially scheduled for distribution by 20th Century Fox. However, due to the studio's acquisition by the Walt Disney Company, Sound of Freedom was put on hold indefinitely. No surprise there.

Ghislaine Maxwell, Disney, 1985.

Fortunately, the filmmakers were able to buy back the distribution rights from Disney and, thanks to equity funding, they successfully released the film on July 4th, 2023. The movie brings attention to the important issue of child trafficking while highlighting the bravery and determination of those who work to combat it (like I once did before realizing that I was merely redirecting attention from people even worse than the ones I dealt with).

Upon its release, the movie faced a curious onslaught of negative reviews, inundated with peculiar mentions of “QAnon conspiracies” that seemed to permeate nearly every article, almost as if these so-called ”journalists” had all received the same scripted message.

As said before, my firm belief is that QAnon has served as a purposeful psychological operation (PsyOp) with the aim of discrediting authentic theories and investigations. An intriguing observation is the scarce presence of QAnon content in conspiracy-related forums, raising suspicions about its artificial nature, resembling a PsyOp. The majority of QAnon rhetoric seems to flow through mainstream media (MSM) channels.

Throughout history, the concept of an Illuminati or controlling cabal has persisted, with discussions on topics like Bohemian Grove. However, QAnon's sudden emergence has hijacked and politicized the subject, leading to its dismissal by a significant portion of the public.

The landscape of accepting alternative theories has transformed over the past decade. In the past, discussions on powerful cabals might have been met with skepticism, but people were more open to hearing such ideas. Today, however, these discussions often result in immediate labeling and rejection, as if programmed to shut down any serious conversation about those in power and issues like child trafficking.

Curiously, the term “Illuminati” has vanished from recent discussions. QAnon essentially embodies the Illuminati concept, but it has become obscured by a mixture of political nonsense and misinformation. Beneath the falsehoods, the core idea endures: a belief in powerful individuals as Satanic pedophiles controlling the world. QAnon appears crafted to discredit anyone daring to discuss this matter seriously.

Deliberately orchestrated, QAnon undermines genuine inquiries into power structures and controversial matters, blurring the line between serious discourse and political gamesmanship. Consequently, those raising important questions about influential figures and hidden agendas face a loss of credibility. The historical concept of secret societies controlling the world remains unchanged, but QAnon has altered how society perceives and discusses this topic.

Interestingly, the film itself had no connection to QAnon or any related topics. Instead, it eloquently portrayed the courageous journey of Tim Ballard and his creation, Operation Underground Railroad, a noble organization committed to combating child sex trafficking. However, the mainstream media pundits appeared keen on weaving this bizarre association, going as far as deeming the movie “controversial.”

The motivations behind this media fervor remain enigmatic, but it's evident that certain individuals linked to the movie have drawn the ire of the press, starting with its star, Jim Caviezel. Despite the lack of any legitimate grounds for controversy, the movie seemed to become a magnet for speculative headlines, leaving many perplexed as to the media's true intentions.

Unlock a Wealth of Insights: Gain Full Access to this Exclusive Article and Others by Subscribing to My Premium Membership.

Your support as a paid subscriber enables me to continue producing high-quality, independent journalism on this important topics. As an ad-free platform, I rely on the support of my readers to keep this content accessible and free from external influence.

---

Before taking on the role in Sound of Freedom, Jim Caveziel was predominantly recognized for his portrayal of Jesus Christ in Mel Gibson's Passion of the Christ. The intensity of that role took a toll on Caveziel as he endured numerous hardships during filming. He was accidentally whipped, suffered a dislocated shoulder, and battled pneumonia and hypothermia.

Even more astonishing, Caveziel encountered a surreal incident while filming the Sermon on the Mount scene when he was struck by lightning, leading to two heart surgeries, including open-heart surgery.

In Sound of Freedom, Caveziel's character exhibits “Christ-like” qualities, particularly in a poignant moment when he gazes tearfully into the camera and utters the words, “God's children are not for sale.”

While the movie refrains from delving into the “conspiracy theories” that the elite seeks to suppress by all means, Jim Caveziel is unreservedly outspoken whenever the opportunity presents itself.

In a subsequent interview, Caveziel directly refers to the satanic elite and the alleged harvesting of adrenochrome, shedding light on topics that are often met with resistance and skepticism in mainstream discourse.

Mel Gibson, another prominent supporter of Sound of Freedom, seems fittingly involved in the project, given one of his most memorable lines as Sir William Wallace in Braveheart: “They can take our lives, but they'll never take our freedom!”

At the height of his stardom, Mel Gibson was an acclaimed global movie star. Yet, even amidst his success, he never shied away from sharing powerful truths that managed to ruffle some feathers.

In a candid interview with Playboy in July 1995, Gibson openly criticized President Bill Clinton, labeling him a “low-level opportunist” manipulated by unseen forces. He also questioned the motives behind the prestigious Rhodes Scholarship at Oxford University, suggesting it might be tied to a “New World Order” and perceived as a “campaign for Marxism.”

In a subsequent 1998 interview, Gibson hinted at the dark, mysterious aspects of Hollywood that delve into a satanic realm. His willingness to discuss such sensitive topics showcased his fearlessness in speaking out about controversial issues.

Despite facing scrutiny for his outspokenness, Mel Gibson's steadfast support for Sound of Freedom aligns with his unwavering commitment to championing truth and exposing hidden realities.

In the years that followed, Mel Gibson faced controversy when some of his drunken tirades, particularly those involving Jews and war, were leaked to the press. As a consequence, he was shunned and blacklisted from Hollywood. Despite his absence from mainstream productions, Gibson resurfaced to lend his open endorsement to Sound of Freedom, a movie that defies the traditional Hollywood mold.

---

The fuss surrounding the movie Sound of Freedom arises from its powerful portrayal of the harrowing issue of child sex trafficking. As mentioned earlier, the film takes a bold approach by fearlessly shedding light on the disturbing reality of this heinous crime. Rather than shying away from the shocking and uncomfortable aspects, the movie unapologetically delves into the darkest corners of the trade, leaving a lasting impact on its viewers.

Sound of Freedom captures the attention of audiences by tugging at their heartstrings with emotionally charged scenes that are nearly impossible to watch. It immerses viewers in the gut-wrenching reality faced by innocent children who suffer at the hands of ruthless traffickers. The movie doesn't gloss over the brutal truth, but instead confronts the audience with the gravity of the situation.

With an unyielding commitment to authenticity, Sound of Freedom depicts scenes that reflect the grim reality faced by countless victims every day. The portrayal of an old drunken tourist stumbling upon a terrified little girl waiting for him is one such poignant moment that hits close to home. In that heart-wrenching scene, the absence of any heroic saviors amplifies the sense of hopelessness and despair these children endure.

What makes Sound of Freedom truly impactful is its unflinching portrayal of the child sex-trafficking industry as a booming and lucrative trade. The film highlights the staggering profit generated by this abominable crime and exposes how children are tragically sold multiple times in a single night, emphasizing the urgency of combating this prevalent issue.

The movie's refusal to shy away from the harsh realities of child sex trafficking is what makes it both moving and “controversial.”

Some critics expressed dissatisfaction with the movie's straightforward approach. They wished for surprise twists and a hero with shades of ambiguity, perhaps even revealing himself to be part of the problem. However, it is essential for these “professional critics” to understand that Sound of Freedom is not a fictional Marvel superhero film filled with random, unpredictable events for entertainment value. Rather, it is a poignant depiction of a true story, aimed at shedding light on a harrowing reality.

The movie's gripping beginning sets the tone, showcasing real and chilling footage of children being snatched from the streets by abductors who work for these sinister networks. The heart-wrenching reality depicted in the film involves these innocent children tragically ending up in child sex networks. Rather than seeking sensational twists, Sound of Freedom stays true to its purpose of telling a genuine story and exposing the horrific truth that many face every day.

Indeed, the children tragically end up in elite pedophile rings, where unspeakable and horrifying practices take place. Unfortunately, corrupt media outlets, under the influence of these powerful elites, launched a bizarre propaganda campaign to undermine Sound of Freedom's message. They stooped to extreme lows in their attempts to disparage the movie, revealing their willingness to manipulate the truth to protect their interests.

As we delve into the details, you'll witness the extent to which these media outlets were willing to go to discredit a film that bravely exposes the dark realities of child sex trafficking and the heinous practices within elite pedophile circles.

---

In Sound of Freedom, a courageous man fearlessly infiltrates child sex-trafficking networks, rescuing innocent children from the clutches of pedophiles. However, the media's response to this heroic narrative is perplexing and concerning. Instead of praising the film's efforts to expose the horrors of child exploitation, they dismiss it with criticism.

Here's the truth: In Sound of Freedom, the pedophiles are unequivocally depicted as the villains they truly are. The movie makes no attempt to sympathize with or humanize these sadistic monsters. It starkly portrays the ruthless nature of those who prey on the vulnerability of innocent children, emphasizing the urgency to stop them at all costs.

However, this narrative challenges the prevailing agenda pushed by mass media recently, which seeks to normalize and sympathize with individuals who identify as “MAPs” (minor-attracted persons). This disturbing agenda attempts to equate them with other sexual “minorities,” blurring the lines between right and wrong.

As a result, nearly every media outlet under elite ownership launched an outrageous assault on Sound of Freedom, publishing articles aimed at discrediting the film and its vital message. Even “reputed” publications like The Washington Post have contributed to this narrative, diverting attention from the film's crucial efforts to expose child sex trafficking and instead undermining its significance.

The media's response reveals a disturbing trend, where protecting powerful interests and pushing dangerous narratives takes precedence over confronting the horrifying reality of child exploitation. As Sound of Freedom strives to expose the truth and fight against the exploitation of innocent children, its battle against media opposition becomes ever more critical.

Bloomberg

Behold the masterful Washington Post, renowned for its headline prowess, expertly linking Sound of Freedom with the fearsome QAnon boogeyman.

And in the second paragraph, they truly outdo themselves, showering us with a delightful assortment of buzzwords. “Pro-Trump QAnon conspiracy cult,” “conspiratorial right,” and even “fascism” – an impressive display indeed. Who knew a movie about child sex trafficking could inspire such creative connections?

But let's not forget the “reviewer’s” passionate disdain for this film. Why, one might wonder, does this critic harbor such animosity? Perhaps they'd be entirely unfazed if it were about cocaine trafficking in Colombia. After all, who cares about the welfare of innocent children when there's a chance to politicize and label everything under the sun?

Well, Noah Berlatsky, the author of this hit piece, sure does not care about the welfare of children. Berlatsky happens to hold the position of communications director for Prostasia, a deeply troubling “pro-pedophilia” advocacy group. This unsettling revelation sheds light on the underlying motives behind the article's distorted narrative and the attempt to taint Sound of Freedom with absurd associations. The fact that such an individual is given a platform to shape public opinion is deeply concerning and calls for a critical examination of the media's responsibility in disseminating information.

According to their delightful claims, Prostasia seems to wholeheartedly support the “Minor Attracted Persons” (MAPs) Club, a charming group notorious for their efforts to normalize pedophilia.

And let's not forget their esteemed general manager, Prescott Bayern, who, as it turns out, was apparently quite active on a pedophile messaging board, where they affectionately referred to themselves as “boy lovers.”

According to Anna Slatz, the founder of Reduxx, Prostasia's admirable efforts include campaigning against child pornography bans, advocating for the legality of child-like sex dolls, and generously funding research into “fantasy sexual outlets” for pedophiles. How utterly post-modern of them!

Let's not overlook Prostasia's astounding condemnations of anti-pedophile sentiment as “Nazi-like” rhetoric, and their call for its censorship across social media. Truly, a cause worth championing, don't you think?

But enough about Prostasia, let's delve into the fascinating mind of Mr. Berlatsky. As it turns out, he appears to be quite the pedo-extremist. And if, by some miraculous chance, you're still not convinced, fear not! There's a delightful tweet from 2017 that complements perfectly the picture.

What a wonderful world we live in, where such enlightening individuals grace us with their presence and ideologies. Truly, an intellectual banquet for the ages!

---

In Berlatsky's article, it is alleged that the review of Sound of Freedom was not a neutral movie review, but rather perceived as a critical piece influenced by a group advocating for the rights of pedophiles. Major media outlets, including the Washington Post, were accused of openly siding with child abusers and aligning the film with the controversial QAnon narrative.

The piece presented the movie as more of an attack on its subject rather than an objective assessment. Unfortunately, this stance was not limited to the Washington Post, as many other prominent media outlets, owned by elites, seemingly adopted a similar perspective. The prevailing narrative was that Sound of Freedom was linked to QAnon—and that remained their only argument.

A headline from The Guardian echoes the buzzwords found in the Washington Post article, which some claim was authored by an individual with concerning affiliations. These media outlets are alleged to be funded by the same overarching system.

Canada's government-funded CBC network also reportedly joined in the narrative. Having previously featured drag queens in schools and content related to child grooming, the CBC criticized Sound of Freedom using similar catchphrases. In a recent interview on CBC Radio, pop culture “columnist” (viewed as a propagandist by some) Radheyan Simonpillai remarked:

““We can’t say that the movie itself is made by QAnon types. But certainly, their political goals make it something that QAnon conspiracy theorists would rally behind. Just like racists rallied behind Trump without him having to say anything overtly racist.
You would have only heard about this movie if you are a regular among church groups, or you regularly watch Fox News, or if you follow right-wing personalities. Or if you are a QAnon conspiracy theorist or part of the so-called Freedom movements.
But make no mistake. The movie’s success has a lot to do with it being a dog whistle for xenophobic, pro-Trump, pro-Life types.”

The “columnist” went on to claim that this film about child trafficking in Colombia serves as a "dog whistle" to appeal to those who support xenophobic, pro-Trump, and pro-Life ideologies. This assertion has led to criticism, with some suggesting that the individual's views may be influenced by the funding received from Canadian taxpayers, potentially propagating pro-pedophile propaganda.

Numerous examples from various global media outlets appear to highlight two noteworthy observations:

1) These outlets appear to derive their talking points from a common globalist elite source.

2) There appears to be a concerted effort to normalize pedophilia, with a willingness to discredit or attack anything that goes against this agenda.

---

While I wouldn't claim Sound of Freedom as the best movie ever made, or completely and entirely realistically depicting the “business” of child sex trafficking, it certainly stands as a well-made film that delves into an important and relevant subject; any impartial reviewer would likely share a similar sentiment. However, the response from certain “reviewers” was far from objective; it felt more like they were shrieking like demons faced with a crucifix.

The impact of Sound of Freedom was evident, as it touched a nerve and revealed the lengths to which the elite, along with its media system, might go to defend pedophilia. In a disturbing twist, mass media outlets from various corners of the world resorted to desperate “reviews” that seemed more like propaganda, utilizing ominous buzzwords to frighten viewers away from the movie by labeling them as “pro-Trump conspiracy cultists.”

Even more alarming, major media institutions like Bloomberg and the Washington Post took the extraordinary step of hiring a pro-pedophilia advocate to attack the film. This decision should prompt everyone to deeply ponder the implications such actions have on our society and the integrity of media organizations.

As always, these propagandists resorted to their familiar tactic: the “far-rightization” of the topic to create fear and division. However, we must recognize that this issue is not confined to a Left versus Right battle; it transcends political affiliations and is fundamentally about distinguishing between good and evil.

Sound of Freedom has broader implications than being a mere movie review. It raises essential questions about media integrity, manipulation, and the urgent need for society to confront and combat the grave issue of child exploitation and trafficking. As viewers and consumers of media, we must remain vigilant and discerning, ensuring that we do not succumb to the influence of biased narratives and propaganda that distract us from the true essence of right and wrong.

---

If the insights shared here resonated with you, I'd appreciate it if you could hit the 'like' button. Also, feel free to share your thoughts and perspectives in the comments section below.