21 Comments
User's avatar
arrotsevni's avatar

Great advice! Don't use language that can be attacked as irrational-madness. Speak with well-organized and logical insight. If one doesn't have enough insight then do not speak till you have studied enough to articulate your thoughts plainly. Better to practice writing them down and read them back to yourself or to others. Our enemy is irrational and tries to force their definition of language on us as the only one to use. Learn what words mean and use them correctly. One of my self-learning tools has been Lily's articles and other's whose writing style and thought process to extend my own skills. The best writers, read what other good writers write and read those authors copiously. Our educational system is a total failure on teaching language skills. Till we get better at education, we must self-educate. Each of us must work at better articulation and to do so we must engage whenever we can those who are better than us.

Expand full comment
Cosmo T Kat's avatar

Good advice! I have also taken this route and why I am here. Lily has been a wonderful source for insight and thought provoking information. I look for every new article with great anticipation for what I will learn.

Expand full comment
melanie ann martin's avatar

we need a wave of consciousness

Expand full comment
Bryan Starmer's avatar

I have to say, “tidal wave of collective madness” is an epic depiction. I’m stealing that one.

Expand full comment
Sloth-of-Bangkok's avatar

I think the 'Cacophony of the Hags' is more fitting.

Expand full comment
John's avatar

As a paid subscriber Lily, you are wroth every penny. Thank you again for your critical thinking.

Expand full comment
Lily's avatar

Thank you John!

Expand full comment
Skidmark's avatar

Restacked. I was trying to convey the exact same idea in my next article but I'm sooo slow you beat me to it. And you're brilliant.

Expand full comment
Scott Staelgraeve's avatar

“Step one: they’ve got to speak, loud and real, without idiotic babbling about Satanists or lizard people that can be ridiculed, cutting through the hypnotic hum before it drowns everything”. Don’t forget the flat Earth…that’s sure to get people to take you seriously.

Expand full comment
James Crockett's avatar

Thanks, Lily. You have a good theory going. Looking forward to more on this path you’re paving.

Expand full comment
Brent Naseath's avatar

Looking forward to your proposed solution.

Expand full comment
Stefano's avatar

In general terms you're right, in terms of civil disobedience, but at the moment, the powers that be are increasing the tempo of the drum beats and only a tiny minority can see the nightmare around the corner.

Today, given events unfolding in Romania, 2025 looks ever more awful with each passing day.

Expand full comment
Andrew N's avatar

It is wise to take admissions of uncertainty seriously, but declarations of high confidence mainly tell you that an individual has constructed a coherent story in his mind, not necessarily that the story is true

Expand full comment
Andrew N's avatar

FAILURE: Inadequate Development of Self

Every individual is faced with the problem of whom to improve,

himself or others. The aim, it seems to me, should be to

effect one's own unfolding, the upgrading of one's own consciousness

- in short, self-perfection. Those who don't even try or, when

trying, find self-perfection too difficult, usually seek to expend

their energy on others. Their energy has to find some target.

Those who succeed in directing their energy inward - particularly

if they be blessed with great energy, like Goethe, for instance

- become moral leaders. Those who fail to direct their

energy inwardly and let it manifest itself externally - particularly

if they be of great energy, like Napoleon, for instance - become

immoral leaders. Those who refuse to rule themselves are usually

bent on ruling others. Those who can rule themselves usually

have no interest in ruling others.

Expand full comment
P.L. Travers's avatar

Sorry, but I disagree with Arendt - charismatic leaders like Hitler, Mussolini, Nasser, Churchill (and even Huey Long) aren’t replaceable, because the cult is about them. It’s only the communists who are replaceable, because they’re spokesmen for an ideology that’s backed by a complex organization, modeled on the Masons.

Expand full comment
Jason's avatar

Interesting, because, these days, everything is about being measureable. Your SMART goals, for instance, that's what the M stands for. Not sure if the mechanistic thinking includes this concept that everything can be measured by numbers, and that nothing is worth doing unless you can quantify it.

I wanted to subscribe to the one dollar for life special, however, this site was broken when I went to sign up.

Expand full comment
Michael Koopman's avatar

Principalities and powers are at work. That call for the wide awake is the call sign used for the color revolution to be moved forward. The belly of the beast ruminates and the bright eyed and edgy avant-garde, the vanguard of those with the gnostic key, are simply the next layer of the same snake.

Virtue and holiness are the only cure.

Expand full comment
Sloth-of-Bangkok's avatar

To sum it up shortly, when the moron scream at you there are five light, you state their are four

Expand full comment