Happy Psy-Op Month

The Actual Issue with the Rainbow Flag - Spoiler: It is not the Flag.

The term “color revolution” has been tainted with the brush of covert operations by US and European interests, aimed at stirring domestic unrest in enemy states (and sometimes even allied ones) to sow discord and weaken their social and political fabric. This is but a modern manifestation of 4th generation warfare, a topic we have already discussed yesterday and on several other occasions.

If you appreciate my articles, please consider giving them a like. It's a simple gesture that doesn't cost you anything, but it goes a long way in promoting this post, combating censorship, and fighting the issues that you are apparently not a big fan of.

4th generation warfare was elucidated by Lieutenant Colonel Michael Aquino, in his white paper 'From Psyop To Mindwar.' The objective is clear: wage war on a foreign nation (or one's own) by targeting the citizenry instead of its armies. In other words, exploit the target population as a weapon to incite instability.

For decades, color revolutions have been orchestrated across the globe. A notable example is the Euromaidan Revolution in Ukraine in 2014, which culminated in the ousting of pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych. This singular event served as the spark for the subsequent Russian invasion of Ukraine, as Vladimir Putin declared he would no longer tolerate color revolutions among Russian allies.

The broader ramifications of this conflict can be debated, and the question of who truly benefits in the long run remains open. Nevertheless, the indisputable fact is that Euromaidan was a NATO-backed color revolution, which ignited a chain of events drawing us ever closer to a global conflict. If chaos was the aim, then the mission has been accomplished.

That said, the Euromaidan revolution and its consequences pale in comparison to a far more extensive and devastating color revolution currently unfolding in Western nations under the guise of the “Pride” movement. In fact, it has become abundantly clear in recent years that Pride is a bona fide color revolution; a political destabilization effort.

LGBT groups enjoy unparalleled support from every pillar of modern society, with major banks, corporations, globalist think-tanks, and governments funneling substantial resources into initiatives that champion their cause. It appears that only those who toe the line are rewarded with the establishment's favor, while genuine rebels are left in the dust. This time, the establishment has enlisted the support of leftist activist “useful idiots” to unleash the same tactics against the Western world that they have previously employed against other nations.

But what makes Pride such a threat to our civilization?

To begin with, the very notion of Pride as a virtue is deeply flawed. As a lesbian woman (you can unsubscribe below), I struggle to comprehend this most basic Pride mantra. It is unclear why one should take pride in their sexual preferences, as being gay does not make one exceptional. Instead, it defines a minority group, but it is not an achievement worthy of parades or an entire month on the calendar. The adage “Pride comes before the fall” exists for a reason; self-aggrandizement based on hollow accomplishments and delusions of entitlement pave the way to self-destruction.

Moreover, Pride activists are akin to rebels without a cause. In the Western world, there are no legal rights that gay and trans individuals are denied. The LGBT+infinity movement has already secured equal rights, leaving them to fabricate grievances to justify their continued rebellion.

So, what is the source of all the whining and fury? What do these revolutionaries focus on once they have achieved equal rights? From my perspective, the LGBT+infinity movement has shifted its focus to targeting and indoctrinating (grooming) children.

In recent times, conservative states have enacted legislation aimed at safeguarding children from ideological indoctrination in public schools and shielding them from the irreversible consequences of bodily alterations in the name of gender politics. Unsurprisingly, trans activists have labeled such laws as “genocide.”

One might wonder about the motivation behind such a characterization. The answer lies in the realization that the survival of their movement hinges on indoctrinating the next generation. A significant proportion of the LGBT community is childless and will remain so, making the indoctrination of other people's children a necessity for the perpetuation of their movement.

This is the hill that leftists have chosen to defend, and with good reason - any successful color revolution relies on the support of the youth. By capturing the minds of society's children, it becomes significantly more challenging for that society to mount a resistance.

Regrettably, the natural inclination of most adults today is to acquiesce to their children's demands rather than confront them. This tendency is problematic, as children are generally ignorant and inexperienced, making them easy targets for manipulation and exploitation by malevolent forces.

The public school system has emerged as the primary vehicle for advancing and normalizing far-left ideologies among Western youth, with teachers and teachers' unions playing a pivotal role in this process. The rapidity with which public schools have embraced progressive ideologies is alarming, and it is largely due to the influence that teachers wield over students for a significant portion of their waking hours.

Regrettably, many parents are hard-pressed to find the time and energy to monitor their children's personal lives and the forces that shape their beliefs. Fortunately, American parents have begun to awaken to the insidious woke indoctrination taking place in schools, although the extent of the damage remains to be seen.

Leftist educators argue that discussions surrounding sexuality and gender identity in the classroom are a matter of civil rights activism, and that attempts to restrict such lessons are discriminatory. This argument, however, is patently absurd. There is no justification for teachers to engage in discussions about sexuality with students, be it heterosexual or homosexual in nature. Moreover, there is a conspicuous lack of empirical evidence to substantiate the validity of gender fluid theories. This is a matter of ideology, not science.

In a bizarre twist of circular reasoning, leftists often contend that children are more vulnerable to religious “groomers,” such as Catholic priests, than to those who advocate for progressive ideologies. This argument, however, is both disingenuous and misleading. The fact that wrongdoing exists in one sphere does not justify its presence in another.

A preponderance of leftist ideologues in education has been documented in numerous surveys, revealing a profound imbalance. Among English teachers, for instance, there are 97 Democrats for every three Republicans, with the disparity being even more pronounced among health teachers, where the ratio is 99 Democrats to one Republican. Among math and science teachers, the ratio is 87 Democrats to 13 Republicans. The evidence is clear: the pervasive “woke” culture among American children is primarily a result of leftist indoctrination by teachers. Eliminate the ideologues from the classroom, and the problem will be resolved.

Furthermore, the foundation of the Pride movement extends beyond mere pride; it is also characterized by an exaggerated emphasis on sexuality for gay individuals in an era of suppressed sexuality for straight people. It is striking that, in contemporary society, heterosexual individuals are increasingly chastised for any expression of desire, while gay people (especially gay men!) are permitted to flaunt their sexuality with impunity, even in the presence of children. This glaring double standard serves to glorify gay sexuality while demonizing heterosexuality.

The “male gaze” and masculinity, in particular, have been targeted for erasure in Western society, with both being labeled as dangerous and “toxic.” However, if one identifies as a gay man or a man who “transitions” into a woman's attire, they are free to behave as they please and will even be celebrated for it. And let us not even delve into the disturbing phenomenon of those who identify as women and then threaten violence against me who refuses to engage in sexual activity with men dressed in women's clothing.

The proverbial elephant in the room is the potential impact of a society that is increasingly LGBT-oriented or that seeks to transition individuals from a young age through indoctrination, surgeries, and hormones. Such a society is likely to experience declining population numbers, which raises questions about the establishment's motivations. Could it be that the ultimate goal is to render the West infertile?

The philosophical underpinnings of the woke color revolution and trans activism are rooted in the notion of subjective reality. If identity and biology are subjective and dependent on perception, then what other aspects of life are similarly malleable? Morality and conscience, for instance. If identity is a social construct, then it follows that moral compass is also subject to social construction. This is a slippery slope, as social constructs that are deemed unfavorable by leftists are often labeled as “fascism.”

---

In essence, the Pride movement is an attempt to create a morally relative society, where right and wrong are viewed as subjective guidelines rather than timeless and inherent rules for living. This is a dangerous path, as the erosion of objective moral standards can only lead to societal collapse.

The signs of this collapse are already evident today, with double standards being applied within the legal system in favor of leftists and minority groups over conservatives and moderates or those who don’t believe that being gay automatically makes them deserve a Nobel Prize. This blatant bias threatens to ignite a civil war, as the law is increasingly used as a tool for political gain rather than upholding justice.

So, here is the thing: No, the problem is not who anyone loves. Sorry. The problem is that the Pride movement (especially the trans part) and the larger woke color revolution are clear examples of psychological operations (psy-ops) aimed at destabilizing the West. If not stopped, these movements will inevitably lead to the deconstruction of our society. The question remains: is this the ultimate goal, or is it merely a means to an end, with chaos being the desired outcome? Only time will tell.

---

How you can support my writing

• Restack, like and share this post via email, text, and social media

• Tip me a bug-free meal with Ko-Fi

• Buy a discount subscription

Thank you; your support keeps me writing and helps me pay the bills. 🧡