Very well written. It seems to me the imbalance between (democrats/Republicans) is not so much a side effect of the OP as it is a desired manufactured outcome. This achieves quite a number of things but two I want to specifically mention. First, it presents the illusion that (Republicans) are the actual target of the system and that "they" are the resistance to the system. From their viewpoint, it is not an OP, just folks with a crazy ideology that once removed from power *including from education * the system will be "fixed". This completely ignores the fact that this conflict is engineered and negates the fact that things like education have been indoctrinating children to support the empire for over a century. It didnt just get bad the last few years, just merely using a sexually charged tactic that it has built over decades to facilitate whatever the real motives of the agenda are. In retrospect the build up was obvious. Which bring me to my second point... it seems like a conflict such as a civil war is desired, which even a minor ( most likely orchestrated) event could bring about significant expansions of domestic surveillance and control that would be applauded. Therby creating a rapid shift in the Overton window. Of course, in this "civil war" the power structure would never be really threatened because it is steering the entire thing into the direction it wants.
It pisses me the hell off that gay people are again/still being used and abused as cannon fodder by the divide&conquer monsters. I grew up liberal but have recently (last 10 yrs or so) come to see very clearly that both sides are totally manipulated for that same purpose.
Some CIA "ngo" [not] was doing this same thing in Russia a decade or more ago, then used the fact that the Russian govt expelled them to make leftists in the US & Europe turn against Putin (as though he personally makes every single decision in that vast country).
Now the same propaganda tactics, totally untrue to how things are in real life, are being fed to the brain dead Xtian nationalists and they're taking the bait like famished pigs.
I won't go on. But thank you for this thoughtful and sane article.
BTW, while MSM was painting Russians as passing anti-gay legislation and even imprisoning gays simply for being gay, which was patently false, Putin was patiently explaining that the new law wasn't anti-gay, it was prohibiting the distribution of Propaganda materials to minors. In another instance, he calmly said Tschaikovsky was a homosexual, and "we love Tschaikovsky."
This is 100% opposite of what western citizens were led to believe.
I realized just how bonkers “liberal” or “left” some of this LGBTQS2+ Wokism has gone when this (classical) liberal leftist would be called a bigot or a hater for merely having questions. It is the same thing with the rest of Identity Politics. Take a reasonable or defensible position, stretch it until it mutates, and then label any pushback, no matter how mild as hatred.
I have nothing solid, just a gut feeling, but it also seems like most of the energy is coming from the top down. The intelligentsia usually winds up controlling a reform movement, but it is the public that often provides the energy and desire. I ain’t seeing the normal bottom up agitation and (college) educated leaders organizing it.
I am not sure that all this is some kind of PsyOp, but it is common to use a disaffected group as a wedge and weapon against the greater society. Some group doing that to the United States could be seen as justice considering all the coups it has caused, often at the behest of corporations.
The victory won by women and gay people in the war against their respective discrimination has been short won before they have both come under attack either directly or via children from an aggressive militant trans activist corps. Thank you for another thoughtful framing of the issue and I certainly won’t be unsubscribing!
A great discussion. The number of gay people in any population is estimated to range 4%-7%. Those who are deemed actual pedophiles closer to 1%. Those who are gay and try to groom children is not a number that can be counted, but it is very small. It is those who are activists in this group, like activists in any group, who shout the loudest and demand access being treated as anyone else is treated. This vocal group is very small but having Internet amplification they sound like a movement. Those very few grooming children, calling this acceptable behavior, raises the back of our neck hair like nothing else. It is this very small group of individuals, with aberrant behaviors, who should be dismissed like any other individual who seeks to con others into giving up their family's well being and security. These aberrant individuals have been placed at the tip of the spear to disrupt societal values by those at the top who want greater control. If we recognize that, then we can easily demand that they lose their access to our schools and libraries and our daughter's lockerrooms because we recognize the game all are playing.
Indeed, this is the continuation of a large-scale plan: the destabilization of the West which was fomented by the Tavistock Institute with relays across the world such as the CFR. This is all part of the same plan of the ruling elites. As the “sexual freedom” of hippies, music, as well as the liberalization of drugs, are the result of a program, the use of “LGBT+” is part of the same program.
Mass brainwashing is called “Long range penetration” and "Inner directional conditioning", and the main effect is to bring and maintain society in a constant state of "shock" (MKultra, etc.) And this is not the only program.
“Minorities” are used without their knowledge. Family life, which constitutes (or should in any case be) the central element of a healthy society, is also targeted.
Create individuals who can be manipulated by "their identities", what they think about, what they believe in, and we can do what we want with them... I don't, they do it ^^
Another great 'Crystallisation' of what most of us believe. For me the ultimate aim is multitudinous and all part of their recipe book to destroy western societies.
Yes, let's keep a clear distinction between the issues of sexual preference, and gender identity... and especially, let's keep it out of the education system. Whatever the motivation for such indoctrination, it's dangerous - to the health and well-being of our children, and to our whole social fabric.
(Which seems to be what they want, of course. And all the more reason to challenge it.)
You might find 'Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control 2nd Ed. ' interesting. Just added to my reading list so can't confirm its any good yet. Also 'Weird Scenes inside the Canyon' by David McGowan as incredibly insightful re 1960s Sex, Drugs and rock and roll as a massive psy op. Well worth it.
Very well written. It seems to me the imbalance between (democrats/Republicans) is not so much a side effect of the OP as it is a desired manufactured outcome. This achieves quite a number of things but two I want to specifically mention. First, it presents the illusion that (Republicans) are the actual target of the system and that "they" are the resistance to the system. From their viewpoint, it is not an OP, just folks with a crazy ideology that once removed from power *including from education * the system will be "fixed". This completely ignores the fact that this conflict is engineered and negates the fact that things like education have been indoctrinating children to support the empire for over a century. It didnt just get bad the last few years, just merely using a sexually charged tactic that it has built over decades to facilitate whatever the real motives of the agenda are. In retrospect the build up was obvious. Which bring me to my second point... it seems like a conflict such as a civil war is desired, which even a minor ( most likely orchestrated) event could bring about significant expansions of domestic surveillance and control that would be applauded. Therby creating a rapid shift in the Overton window. Of course, in this "civil war" the power structure would never be really threatened because it is steering the entire thing into the direction it wants.
Thank you, Lily.
For a homosexual woman to have the balls to express these common-sense observations is refreshing. Where are other sensible gay people
who don't believe their sexual orientation makes them " special", or that anyone else cares how they like to couple?
Is their silence consent to the wretched excesses of the public "Sodomite Pride" cult?
"Do what thou wilt", but not in plain view, please.
If you would like more “sensible gay people” this is a great conversation:
https://youtu.be/YysgbnBohhc?si=zSujx4bfkbPXWQkT
Have you noticed, this was never a problem before - until government and news media made it an issue? Seems to be a reoccurring theme.
🙏 as always a sensible and informative read
Wait - you're a LESBIAN??? Oh-Em-Gee the horrors... LOL
Actually, judging from little observations you have made in previous posts... kind of figured ;-)
Off to restack - fantastic piece as always...
It pisses me the hell off that gay people are again/still being used and abused as cannon fodder by the divide&conquer monsters. I grew up liberal but have recently (last 10 yrs or so) come to see very clearly that both sides are totally manipulated for that same purpose.
Some CIA "ngo" [not] was doing this same thing in Russia a decade or more ago, then used the fact that the Russian govt expelled them to make leftists in the US & Europe turn against Putin (as though he personally makes every single decision in that vast country).
Now the same propaganda tactics, totally untrue to how things are in real life, are being fed to the brain dead Xtian nationalists and they're taking the bait like famished pigs.
I won't go on. But thank you for this thoughtful and sane article.
BTW, while MSM was painting Russians as passing anti-gay legislation and even imprisoning gays simply for being gay, which was patently false, Putin was patiently explaining that the new law wasn't anti-gay, it was prohibiting the distribution of Propaganda materials to minors. In another instance, he calmly said Tschaikovsky was a homosexual, and "we love Tschaikovsky."
This is 100% opposite of what western citizens were led to believe.
I realized just how bonkers “liberal” or “left” some of this LGBTQS2+ Wokism has gone when this (classical) liberal leftist would be called a bigot or a hater for merely having questions. It is the same thing with the rest of Identity Politics. Take a reasonable or defensible position, stretch it until it mutates, and then label any pushback, no matter how mild as hatred.
I have nothing solid, just a gut feeling, but it also seems like most of the energy is coming from the top down. The intelligentsia usually winds up controlling a reform movement, but it is the public that often provides the energy and desire. I ain’t seeing the normal bottom up agitation and (college) educated leaders organizing it.
I am not sure that all this is some kind of PsyOp, but it is common to use a disaffected group as a wedge and weapon against the greater society. Some group doing that to the United States could be seen as justice considering all the coups it has caused, often at the behest of corporations.
The victory won by women and gay people in the war against their respective discrimination has been short won before they have both come under attack either directly or via children from an aggressive militant trans activist corps. Thank you for another thoughtful framing of the issue and I certainly won’t be unsubscribing!
Thank you for raising my awareness on this issue and for filling in the blanks.
A great discussion. The number of gay people in any population is estimated to range 4%-7%. Those who are deemed actual pedophiles closer to 1%. Those who are gay and try to groom children is not a number that can be counted, but it is very small. It is those who are activists in this group, like activists in any group, who shout the loudest and demand access being treated as anyone else is treated. This vocal group is very small but having Internet amplification they sound like a movement. Those very few grooming children, calling this acceptable behavior, raises the back of our neck hair like nothing else. It is this very small group of individuals, with aberrant behaviors, who should be dismissed like any other individual who seeks to con others into giving up their family's well being and security. These aberrant individuals have been placed at the tip of the spear to disrupt societal values by those at the top who want greater control. If we recognize that, then we can easily demand that they lose their access to our schools and libraries and our daughter's lockerrooms because we recognize the game all are playing.
Indeed, this is the continuation of a large-scale plan: the destabilization of the West which was fomented by the Tavistock Institute with relays across the world such as the CFR. This is all part of the same plan of the ruling elites. As the “sexual freedom” of hippies, music, as well as the liberalization of drugs, are the result of a program, the use of “LGBT+” is part of the same program.
Mass brainwashing is called “Long range penetration” and "Inner directional conditioning", and the main effect is to bring and maintain society in a constant state of "shock" (MKultra, etc.) And this is not the only program.
“Minorities” are used without their knowledge. Family life, which constitutes (or should in any case be) the central element of a healthy society, is also targeted.
Create individuals who can be manipulated by "their identities", what they think about, what they believe in, and we can do what we want with them... I don't, they do it ^^
Another great 'Crystallisation' of what most of us believe. For me the ultimate aim is multitudinous and all part of their recipe book to destroy western societies.
Very insightful, and well expressed!
Yes, let's keep a clear distinction between the issues of sexual preference, and gender identity... and especially, let's keep it out of the education system. Whatever the motivation for such indoctrination, it's dangerous - to the health and well-being of our children, and to our whole social fabric.
(Which seems to be what they want, of course. And all the more reason to challenge it.)
Great piece, thankyou!
Thank you for highlighting the "Rockefeller strategy" of societal collapse 1974. Although only one of the 5 legs of the strategy, well done.
It's all over, but nobody can hear the singing for all of the noise.
Incredibly insightful and focused, many thanks :)
You might find 'Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control 2nd Ed. ' interesting. Just added to my reading list so can't confirm its any good yet. Also 'Weird Scenes inside the Canyon' by David McGowan as incredibly insightful re 1960s Sex, Drugs and rock and roll as a massive psy op. Well worth it.