The Pointless War of the Ideologies

How Globalists are Using One Side of the Coin to Make the Masses Beg for the Other And Why They Will Ultimately Fail.

May 27, 2024

Beneath the rough waves of every global socio-economic and political event, a relentless, yet often unnoticed, battle rages. This war is not fought with traditional weapons, but with narratives and facts, with journalistic warfare and silent individual acts of defiance. It is a conflict defined by two factions, philosophically and spiritually poles apart.

On one side, a network of corporate titans, elites, banking institutions, international financial conglomerates, think tanks, and political pawns. They labor incessantly to mold public psychology and society into their vision of a “New World Order.”

A world meticulously centralized, where they hold the reins of every facet of government, trade, life, and even moral values. I refer to them as the “Globalists,” a term they occasionally use for themselves, with a touch of irony, one might add.

The other side is a movement that has emerged organically, spontaneously, without a hierarchical leadership structure. Yet, it is guided subtly by examples set by various mentors and activists, bound by a set of principles rooted in natural law.

It is a diverse coalition of the religious, the agnostic, and atheists. It is a movement of people from all ethnic and financial backgrounds, united by a single, unyielding belief in the one thing they all agree upon - the inherent, inborn rights to freedom. I will creatively call them the “Liberty Movement.”

The Globalists, with their grasp on power, are a far cry from being the benevolent stewards of humanity they portray themselves to be. Their vision of a centralized world order is a chilling dystopia, where individual freedoms are sacrificed at the altar of collective control. Their economic theories, which they peddle as panaceas for global problems, are merely tools to consolidate power and wealth in the hands of a few.

The Liberty Movement, on the other hand, is a beacon of hope in this encroaching darkness. It is a testament to the indomitable human spirit that yearns for freedom, a bulwark against the tidal wave of globalism. Its members, through their individual acts of courage and defiance, are rewriting the narrative of our time, challenging the status quo, and daring to dream of a world where freedom is not a privilege, but a birthright.

The Globalists' economic theories, such as Keynesian economics, are nothing more than pseudo-scientific justifications for wealth redistribution and centralized control. They advocate for excessive government spending as a means to stimulate economic growth, yet all this does is create inflation, devalue currency, and burden future generations with debt. It's akin to treating a patient's symptoms without addressing the underlying disease, or worse, creating new ailments in the process.

Meanwhile, the Liberty Movement champions for economic freedom, advocating for sound money, limited government, and actual free markets. They understand that true prosperity comes from individual enterprise and innovation, not government intervention. They believe in the power of the free market to correct itself, to allocate resources efficiently, and to foster competition and creativity.

In the realm of politics, the Globalists peddle a false dichotomy of left and right, creating a divisive and polarized climate. They manipulate the political spectrum, pitting people against each other, while they maintain their grip on power. It's a political theater, a puppet show designed to distract and divert attention from their true agenda.

The Liberty Movement, in contrast, transcends these artificial divisions. It recognizes that true political power resides in the individual, not in a political party or a government institution. It advocates for a return to constitutional principles, for limited government, and for the protection of individual rights and liberties. It's a movement that seeks to unite, not divide, to empower, not control.

Those who believe they are mere spectators in this war, those who turn a blind eye, and those who are blissfully unaware, are all gravely mistaken. This conflict will touch every single person, leaving no one unscathed.

This is a war for the future of humankind, a struggle that will shape the destiny of generations to come. The outcome will determine whether our children and grandchildren will have the freedom to choose their own path, to reach their true potential as individuals, or if they will be shackled by a faceless, soulless technocracy that cares little for their aspirations and dreams.

As you may have gathered, I am not an impartial observer in this battle. There are those who, in their intellectual arrogance, attempt to dismiss this conflict as a mere ideological tussle, accusing both sides of seeking to impose their worldview on the rest of humanity. I would argue that such individuals are woefully ignorant of the true stakes at play.

The war between the Globalists and the Liberty Movement is not a petty squabble, but a struggle for the very soul of humanity. It is a battle between those who seek to control and those who seek to liberate, between those who wish to dominate and those who wish to empower.

The Globalists, with their insidious agenda, seek to create a world order that stifles individuality, creativity, and freedom. They wish to impose a homogenized, sanitized version of reality, where diversity of thought is discouraged, and conformity is rewarded. They masquerade as saviors, promising a utopia of peace and prosperity, but in reality, they offer only a dystopian nightmare of control and oppression.

The Liberty Movement, on the other hand, stands for the exact opposite. It champions the cause of individual freedom, of the right of every person to live their life as they see fit, as long as they do not infringe on the rights of others. It believes in the power of the human spirit, in the potential of every individual to achieve greatness, if only they are given the freedom to do so.

GLOBALISM VS. “POPULISM”

The globalists have been employing the tactic of false dichotomies for centuries, dividing nations and peoples against each other to capitalize on the ensuing chaos. However, the aforementioned dichotomy is perhaps the closest they have ever come to presenting a genuine divide.

The past approval of the Brexit referendum in the U.K., or the election of Donald Trump, had sparked a wave of propaganda from the establishment media. The underlying message was that “populists” are behind the opposition to globalization and these populists will bring about the downfall of nations and the global economy. In other words, globalism equals good, populism equals bad.

There is indeed a real struggle between globalists and those who strive for a free, decentralized, and voluntary society. They have merely altered some of the labels and terminology. The effectiveness of this strategy for the elites remains to be seen, but it does serve their purposes in certain ways.

The use of the term “populist” is as clinical and removed from “freedom and liberty” as possible. It implies not just “nationalism,” but a selfish form of nationalism. And the connection the globalists hope people will make is that selfish nationalism leads to destructive fascism (i.e., Nazis). Thus, when you hear the term “populist,” they want you to think “Nazi.”

It's also worth noting that the narrative of the rise of populism coincides with dire warnings from the elites that such movements will trigger a global economic collapse if they continue to gain momentum. Of course, the elites have been orchestrating an economic collapse for years, and we have already been feeling its effects for some time. In a cunning move, the elites have attempted to rebrand the liberty movement as “populist” (Nazis), and use liberty activists as scapegoats for the financial crisis they engineered.

Will the public fully fall for it? I'm not sure. I believe that depends on how effectively we expose their strategy before the collapse becomes too deeply ingrained. The elites have handled the economic collapse expertly, however.

There is no solution that can prevent it from unfolding. Even if every globalist criminal was brought to justice tomorrow and honest leadership was restored to government, the numbers cannot be altered, and decades of struggle will be necessary before national economies can flourish once more.

COMMUNISM VS. FASCISM

This is yet another machination of the globalists, a cunning strategy to fracture societies and instigate chaos, which they can then exploit for their agenda of centralized control. If you harbor any skepticism about the engineered nature of fascism and communism, I implore you to delve into the meticulously documented research of Antony Sutton. His findings are too extensive to be adequately summarized here, but they are certainly worth your scrutiny.

In the contemporary landscape, we witness elites like George Soros financing and abetting the latest manifestation of communist forces, embodied in social justice groups such as Black Lives Matter. The collectivist frenzy and Orwellian conduct displayed by these race-obsessed entities, including BLM and third-wave feminists, is provoking a severe backlash from conservatives. These individuals, weary of being dictated to on every issue and at every moment, are reaching their breaking point. And this, my friends, is the very objective...

To comprehend the state of America in 2024, one need only look back at Europe during the tumultuous 1930s. The continent was overrun by communist agitators, some genuine and others fabricated by the establishment itself, instigating labor unrest and fiscal instability. The elites then sponsored and promoted fascism as the antidote to communism. Even the most moderate conservatives, driven to the brink by the relentless provocation of the communists, morphed into something equally monstrous in response.

The United States may be teetering on the same precipice if we fail to exercise caution. Shootings in Texas serve as a perfect opportunity for the globalists to advance their agenda. Consider this for a moment: on one side, Democratic Presidents are urging liberals to counter police brutality by further federalizing law enforcement. On the other side, some Republicans argue that a more militarized police presence is the solution to curb groups like BLM from causing further disruption. Notice how the only solution being offered is an increased federal presence on our streets?

However, I perceive a significant flaw in the globalists' plan to orchestrate a communist versus fascist showdown in the U.S., and that flaw lies in the existence of the Liberty Movement. The movement has matured significantly in its media presence and influence. It now wields enough clout to neutralize certain aspects of the rising fascist sentiment among the political Right.

The elites' only viable option is to co-opt the Liberty Movement. If they can manipulate liberty proponents into supporting a fascist system, they would be on the cusp of total victory. However, this scenario is highly improbable given the unwavering adherence of liberty advocates to their principles.

The elites might succeed in persuading a large segment of the public to align with their false paradigm, but if they fail to ensnare the millions who constitute the Liberty Movement, their task becomes exponentially more challenging.

MORAL COMPASS VS. MORAL RELATIVISM

The globalists seek to promote moral relativism as a means of control, hoping to create a society that is easily manipulated and ruled. By removing the foundations of right and wrong, they aim to create a world where their twisted desires and agendas can flourish unchecked. However, the inherent human conscience is a formidable obstacle to their plans.

Conscience is not a product of social conditioning or cultural norms, but rather an intrinsic aspect of the human psyche. It is the voice within us that guides us towards good and away from evil. It is not a gray area open to interpretation, but a compass that points us towards the truth. The globalists may seek to cloud our judgement and confuse our senses, but they cannot erase our conscience.

The notion of moral relativism is not only impractical but also dangerous. It seeks to erase the line between right and wrong, creating a world where evil can masquerade as good. It is an insidious ideology that seeks to undermine our morality and corrupt our souls. The globalists may promote it as a means of progress, but it is nothing more than a tool of control.

The ideology of moral relativism may be prevalent in our popular culture, but it has yet to fully take hold. This is a testament to the strength of the human conscience and our innate desire for justice and truth.

COLLECTIVISM VS. INDIVIDUALISM

In essence, globalism's core tenet is the sacrifice of sovereignty and individualism for the greater good of the collective. However, the very nature of groups is abstract, existing only as long as the individuals within them recognize them as viable.

The elites must persuade people that individualism is a threat and that collectivism is the only solution to prevent the disasters caused by those who seek independence. Yet, most of the calamities we face on a national or global scale are orchestrated by the elites, not by rogue individuals or sovereign nations. They then use these crises to vilify the very notion of sovereignty, branding it as a barbaric relic of the past that must be eradicated.

To reinforce the need for collectivism, the globalists must engage with people on a psychological level. While humans have an innate desire to interact with their fellow beings, they also possess an inherent identity and drive to pursue their own growth without interference. People enjoy being part of a group as long as their participation is healthy, voluntary, and based on choice.

However, humans are inherently tribal, with psychological and biological limits to the size of the tribe they prefer. Professor Robin Dunbar, a prominent evolutionary psychologist in the 1990s, discovered a cognitive limit to the number of individuals with whom any one person can maintain stable relationships. This number ranges from 100 to 200 people. Similarly, there is a limitation to the size of effective groups versus ineffective ones, with effective tribes and communities typically falling between 500 to 2500 people.

The human mind does not adapt well to vast tribal groups, and the idea of a “global tribe” is met with resistance. People function better in smaller groups and do not appreciate being forced into participating in any group, especially larger ones.

This may explain the sense of isolation experienced by those living in urban areas, despite being surrounded by millions of neighbors and hundreds of associates. They still feel alone because they lack a functioning tribe of an acceptable size.

While large numbers of people can be united by a resonant ideal, which is the primary reason for nations to form, this is the extent of voluntary association. Globalist collectivism goes against human nature. People instinctively recognize it as an act of force and suppression, and will inevitably resist its false tribalism as they begin to see its true nature.

TOTAL CONTROL VS. REALITY

The globalists' pursuit of total control is not only unachievable but also fundamentally flawed. The goal of complete micro-control is mathematically and psychologically impossible, and their delusional quest breeds weakness.

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle illustrates this issue, as it dictates that anyone observing a system in action can still affect the behavior of that system indirectly or unconsciously in ways they could never predict. This limitation results in unknown quantities, making predictability impossible, and total control of the system unattainable.

This principle also applies to human psychology, as psychoanalysts have discovered when treating patients. The observer can never observe their patient without indirectly affecting their behavior in unpredictable ways. Therefore, a completely objective analysis of that patient can never be obtained.

What the elites seek is a system by which they can observe and influence all of us in minute detail without triggering a reaction that they wouldn't expect. However, the laws of physics and psychology make this level of control impossible. There will always be unknown quantities, free radicals, and wild cards that can bring down even a seemingly perfect utopia.

Furthermore, Kurt Godel's Incompleteness Proof provides a mathematical explanation of the elites' struggle against unknown quantities and their inevitable failure. Godel's work proved that infinity is a self-inclusive paradox that cannot be defined through mathematics.

Bertrand Russell, a well-known globalist, worked tirelessly to show that the entirety of the universe could be broken down into numbers. However, Russell's efforts were fruitless, and Godel's proof later crushed his theory. Russell opposed Godel's proof, but to no avail.

Godel's mathematical proof destroyed the very core of the globalist ideology, proving that the globalist aspirations of godhood would never be realized. There are limits to the knowledge of man and limits to what he can control. This is something globalists can never accept, for if they did, every effort they have made for decades, if not centuries, would be pointless.

The issue is one of unknown quantities. Can human society ever be fully dominated, or is the act of rebellion against oppressive systems a part of nature? The establishment's constant attention to the idea of the “lone wolf” and the damage one person acting outside the dictates of the system can do suggests that the elites fear the unpredictable reactions that could undermine their authority.

The true power to shape this world has always lain in your hands. Choose well!

This is why the globalists are destined to lose. They can never know all the unknowns. They can never control all the free radicals. There will always be rebellion. There will always be a liberty movement.

The entirety of their utopian schematic revolves around the need to remove unknowns. However, control at these levels is so frail that it becomes useless and mortally dangerous.

In their arrogance, they have ignored the warnings of the very sciences they worship and have set their eventual end in stone. While they may leave a considerable path of destruction in their wake, it is already written; they will not win.