Personally, I think ideology is just a propaganda tool. It's all about the money and control. The purpose of ideology with political parties is to differentiate themselves just as other businesses do. The elite see themselves as the entitled rulers and the rest of us as the default followers. It was no different with the Federalist founding fathers. Remember Alexander Hamilton's quote, the masses are asses.
Yet another profound article! They will exert more control if they can control spending through a digital dollar and control communication through censorship.
There is always hope, Star Wars style. But wouldn't it be nice if we could reverse it before it took a rebellion in the form of a revolution with violence?
We can. A black swan event has occurred that could give the power to the people to rule themselves rather than be ruled by elite-controlled representatives. Through innovative yet practical changes to two government processes, we could create a nonpartisan direct democracy called a Collaborative Democracy. It is based on collective intelligence and it protects the government from outside influences such as lobbyists, special interests, the WEF, political parties, and the ultra wealthy elite who control them and fund their candidates. https://endpoliticsnow.com/
The main parts of it have been used around the world with real success, demonstrating that it does work. The solution is the natural resistance to control and domination.
An interesting concept the idea of Collaborative Democracy.
Currently most of the Commonwealth Countries as well as some ex Commonwealth Countries have adopted the Westminster System which is also a corrupt system and essentially an elective dictatorship that was described by Lord Hailsham in 1970. That is a very similar system we have in South Africa where it is dominated by what essentially can be described Gang or a Mafia of collaborating "Parties" who masquerade as a legitimate Parliament but have tricked the people into the "Party" System which favours the oligarchs who control the funders of the Political parties. It is also called the "Party System".
I can put you in contact with a bloke John Cruttwell in France who is very knowledgeable about the system. You're welcome to contact me sunfacejack@protonmail.com
Interesting concept Brent. I briefly looked at your website and I think you're on the right track. Decentralized decision control (as the Framers originally intended) at a local level. I imagine it would take quite a while to implement, and a Constitutional Convention to authorize it. I plan to dig deeper into this.
Their brand is crisis. The corporate side, feeds off the manipulation of us plebs. They use people against people. Pushing main stream Misinformation. Evil is united in one goal= destroy everything that's true and pure.
Once again Lily, I agree with what you say, the only remark I will make to complete this reflection is that the system is capable and knows very well how to infiltrate all “movements” or “organizations”. He has studied and knows the psychological mechanisms, he knows how to manipulate from the inside in order to direct this or that “movement”.
For example, in France there were the “yellow vests”; I don't know if it was really spontaneous, if it was "recovered", was it a Psyop? it's possible too. Regardless, as the movement grew and more of the population became aware of this "scam", and began to believe that we could live without this oppressive system, What did the system do at that time? just a show of force.
And who wants to be hit with batons, tear gas, etc., to lose an eye, a hand, and maybe more...??
So the game is not won in advance, even if I also think that the system does not control everything, there is always a free electron, a grain of sand in the machine, so let's all individually be this grain of sand.
And one thing is certain, and I know this from experience, the more you bend your back, the more they squeeze you.
In addition to Heisenberg and Gödel, I would add the economic calculation problem described by von Mises and Rothbard. A centrally planned economy always fails, always produces scarcity and always results in violence to keep the central schemers in power.
Enlightenment Liberalism is a broad concept encompassing, really, all the major political ideologies of the twentieth century. They are all predicated upon the notion that "man is the measure of all things" and that "the voice of the people is the voice of God". Both these statements, as well as "all men are created equal" are false. At best they are wishes rather than reality. I accept the Chrisitan Nationalist label as more or less descriptive of the traditionalist movement in historically Christian countries. I find no fault in it. The American Creed is merely one expression of Enlightenment Liberalism. The true right tends toward monarchism or at least a dominant party system. But that is too far right for the 1776 crowd. What they cannot accept is that they can no longer share power with American liberals who have been working relentlessly to delegitimize them. Either MAGA will put the Democratic Party and the entire Uniparty permanently out of business, or it will be defeated by them. In order to do so, it will necessarily have to become more authoritarian since our system in America lacks the tools to get the job done. In other words, "The Constitution is not a suicide pact."
I'm not sure you have the divide right. Globally and domestically, I see really only two sides: the side of Enlightenment Liberalism vs the side of Traditional Nationalism. EL has become a fascist oligarchy of the uniparty in the US. TN is the collection of worldviews of the Russians, Chinese, Iranians, Indians, etc. There is no Liberty movement. MAGA is simply a hybrid of EL and Christian Nationalism, a strain of TN. But it is a house divided against itself and lacks any international counterpart for its quirky libertarian streak, which is uniquely American due to the EL nature of our founding Revolution. But EL is dying. That is the larger dynamic. And MAGA, if it wishes to survive and overcome the Uniparty, will have to overcome its naivete re "Liberty". It will be a harsh lesson and MAGA may fall with EL.
"MAGA is simply a hybrid of EL and Christian Nationalism, a strain of TN."
I think you are attempting a leap here to prove your perspective. MAGA is a notion that centers around a desire for renewal of who and what this country stands for, this is a set of principals that were always centered around our founding documents and reiterated in what was known as the American Creed. EL is an ideology centered around a belief set, and Christian Nationalism is a term used by those who seek to stoke fear of the religious.
Lily, you've hit to the two main issues I struggle with:
"A world meticulously centralized, where they hold the reins of every facet of government, trade, life, and even moral values."
"The other side is a movement that has emerged organically, spontaneously, without a hierarchical leadership structure."
I seriously wonder if Liberty will prevail without a hierarchical leadership structure. I've read so many essays the point out the problems we face but no central, organized way forward to defeat the Globalists. Maybe I'm too pessimistic?
It's difficult to say, but it seems to me that the "Wall Street trilogy" is an important piece that helps to understand how the false east/west dichotomy, or the false dichotomy of liberalism/marxism or capitalism/communist , etc., which constitutes a large part of the official history (of the elite) which serves as a screen, but is only a truncated vision of the true events and the underlying realities. The attempted monopoly of the elite, who are stateless, who use countries, states, governments, banks, religions, "so-called secret societies", and everything else related to them, as instruments of the "structure", prefer people formatted to their tastes.
Sutton was fired because he started looking behind the (iron?^^) curtain and especially because he said so.
Besides, the devil is in the details it seems, why at the moment, given the situation and despite the "sanctions" of the "corrupt" West, Putin is still an "honorary citizen" of the “City” (of London)? ^^
Thoughtful article. May I refer you to: Chantal Delsol “The “Common Idiot” of Populism” pp 31- 52
Contemporary Populism: A Controversial Concept and Its Diverse Forms,
Edited by Sergiu Gherghina, Sergiu Mişcoiu and Sorina Soare
Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne 2013? The idios is the individual. Professor Delsol looks at the Classical Athenian antecedents including Aristotle's "few and the many."
So much wasted effort that could benefit humankind...
While I mostly agree, I am a little more forgiving....... well, understanding may be a better word.
The globalists are more pitiful and contemptible than evil.
https://zorkthehun.substack.com/p/vee-zee-people-in-zis-wroom
I call it class level sociopathy.
I like that, but I have to think about it, still....
Whether it is the essence, or just the unavoidable consequence of ideological zealotry.
Personally, I think ideology is just a propaganda tool. It's all about the money and control. The purpose of ideology with political parties is to differentiate themselves just as other businesses do. The elite see themselves as the entitled rulers and the rest of us as the default followers. It was no different with the Federalist founding fathers. Remember Alexander Hamilton's quote, the masses are asses.
Yes, there will always be Errants and lovers of freedom, and hopefully there are more of us now than there were a few years ago...
Yet another profound article! They will exert more control if they can control spending through a digital dollar and control communication through censorship.
There is always hope, Star Wars style. But wouldn't it be nice if we could reverse it before it took a rebellion in the form of a revolution with violence?
We can. A black swan event has occurred that could give the power to the people to rule themselves rather than be ruled by elite-controlled representatives. Through innovative yet practical changes to two government processes, we could create a nonpartisan direct democracy called a Collaborative Democracy. It is based on collective intelligence and it protects the government from outside influences such as lobbyists, special interests, the WEF, political parties, and the ultra wealthy elite who control them and fund their candidates. https://endpoliticsnow.com/
The main parts of it have been used around the world with real success, demonstrating that it does work. The solution is the natural resistance to control and domination.
An interesting concept the idea of Collaborative Democracy.
Currently most of the Commonwealth Countries as well as some ex Commonwealth Countries have adopted the Westminster System which is also a corrupt system and essentially an elective dictatorship that was described by Lord Hailsham in 1970. That is a very similar system we have in South Africa where it is dominated by what essentially can be described Gang or a Mafia of collaborating "Parties" who masquerade as a legitimate Parliament but have tricked the people into the "Party" System which favours the oligarchs who control the funders of the Political parties. It is also called the "Party System".
I can put you in contact with a bloke John Cruttwell in France who is very knowledgeable about the system. You're welcome to contact me sunfacejack@protonmail.com
Interesting concept Brent. I briefly looked at your website and I think you're on the right track. Decentralized decision control (as the Framers originally intended) at a local level. I imagine it would take quite a while to implement, and a Constitutional Convention to authorize it. I plan to dig deeper into this.
Their brand is crisis. The corporate side, feeds off the manipulation of us plebs. They use people against people. Pushing main stream Misinformation. Evil is united in one goal= destroy everything that's true and pure.
Thanks Lily. Love your work <3
Once again Lily, I agree with what you say, the only remark I will make to complete this reflection is that the system is capable and knows very well how to infiltrate all “movements” or “organizations”. He has studied and knows the psychological mechanisms, he knows how to manipulate from the inside in order to direct this or that “movement”.
For example, in France there were the “yellow vests”; I don't know if it was really spontaneous, if it was "recovered", was it a Psyop? it's possible too. Regardless, as the movement grew and more of the population became aware of this "scam", and began to believe that we could live without this oppressive system, What did the system do at that time? just a show of force.
And who wants to be hit with batons, tear gas, etc., to lose an eye, a hand, and maybe more...??
So the game is not won in advance, even if I also think that the system does not control everything, there is always a free electron, a grain of sand in the machine, so let's all individually be this grain of sand.
And one thing is certain, and I know this from experience, the more you bend your back, the more they squeeze you.
In addition to Heisenberg and Gödel, I would add the economic calculation problem described by von Mises and Rothbard. A centrally planned economy always fails, always produces scarcity and always results in violence to keep the central schemers in power.
Glad to see Antony Sutton mentioned.
Could not agree more!
Enlightenment Liberalism is a broad concept encompassing, really, all the major political ideologies of the twentieth century. They are all predicated upon the notion that "man is the measure of all things" and that "the voice of the people is the voice of God". Both these statements, as well as "all men are created equal" are false. At best they are wishes rather than reality. I accept the Chrisitan Nationalist label as more or less descriptive of the traditionalist movement in historically Christian countries. I find no fault in it. The American Creed is merely one expression of Enlightenment Liberalism. The true right tends toward monarchism or at least a dominant party system. But that is too far right for the 1776 crowd. What they cannot accept is that they can no longer share power with American liberals who have been working relentlessly to delegitimize them. Either MAGA will put the Democratic Party and the entire Uniparty permanently out of business, or it will be defeated by them. In order to do so, it will necessarily have to become more authoritarian since our system in America lacks the tools to get the job done. In other words, "The Constitution is not a suicide pact."
I'm not sure you have the divide right. Globally and domestically, I see really only two sides: the side of Enlightenment Liberalism vs the side of Traditional Nationalism. EL has become a fascist oligarchy of the uniparty in the US. TN is the collection of worldviews of the Russians, Chinese, Iranians, Indians, etc. There is no Liberty movement. MAGA is simply a hybrid of EL and Christian Nationalism, a strain of TN. But it is a house divided against itself and lacks any international counterpart for its quirky libertarian streak, which is uniquely American due to the EL nature of our founding Revolution. But EL is dying. That is the larger dynamic. And MAGA, if it wishes to survive and overcome the Uniparty, will have to overcome its naivete re "Liberty". It will be a harsh lesson and MAGA may fall with EL.
"MAGA is simply a hybrid of EL and Christian Nationalism, a strain of TN."
I think you are attempting a leap here to prove your perspective. MAGA is a notion that centers around a desire for renewal of who and what this country stands for, this is a set of principals that were always centered around our founding documents and reiterated in what was known as the American Creed. EL is an ideology centered around a belief set, and Christian Nationalism is a term used by those who seek to stoke fear of the religious.
Why do you see Liberty as a concept of naivete?
Lily, you've hit to the two main issues I struggle with:
"A world meticulously centralized, where they hold the reins of every facet of government, trade, life, and even moral values."
"The other side is a movement that has emerged organically, spontaneously, without a hierarchical leadership structure."
I seriously wonder if Liberty will prevail without a hierarchical leadership structure. I've read so many essays the point out the problems we face but no central, organized way forward to defeat the Globalists. Maybe I'm too pessimistic?
Not heard of Antony Sutton. Can you link me with where to start reading his work?
It's difficult to say, but it seems to me that the "Wall Street trilogy" is an important piece that helps to understand how the false east/west dichotomy, or the false dichotomy of liberalism/marxism or capitalism/communist , etc., which constitutes a large part of the official history (of the elite) which serves as a screen, but is only a truncated vision of the true events and the underlying realities. The attempted monopoly of the elite, who are stateless, who use countries, states, governments, banks, religions, "so-called secret societies", and everything else related to them, as instruments of the "structure", prefer people formatted to their tastes.
Sutton was fired because he started looking behind the (iron?^^) curtain and especially because he said so.
Besides, the devil is in the details it seems, why at the moment, given the situation and despite the "sanctions" of the "corrupt" West, Putin is still an "honorary citizen" of the “City” (of London)? ^^
Thoughtful article. May I refer you to: Chantal Delsol “The “Common Idiot” of Populism” pp 31- 52
Contemporary Populism: A Controversial Concept and Its Diverse Forms,
Edited by Sergiu Gherghina, Sergiu Mişcoiu and Sorina Soare
Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne 2013? The idios is the individual. Professor Delsol looks at the Classical Athenian antecedents including Aristotle's "few and the many."