How to Make Covid-19 "Appear Like a Small Disturbance"

Why a worldwide cyberattack may be the WEF's upcoming major initiative.

The World Economic Forum (WEF), representing Western financial elites, played a pivotal role in instigating the March 11, 2020 COVID-19 lockdown, which contributed to a global upheaval in economic and social stability. Additionally, it actively supported the introduction of the Covid-19 vaccine in November 2020, a move that has been widely reported to have led to a significant increase in mortality and morbidity on a global scale.

If you appreciate my articles, please consider giving them a like. It's a simple gesture that doesn't cost you anything, but it goes a long way in promoting this post, combating censorship, and fighting the issues that you are apparently not a big fan of.

Now, they are hinting at a forthcoming crisis that is projected to be even more severe than the Covid-19 pandemic. Over the past four years, commencing in January 2020, we have witnessed a deliberate orchestration of chaos as part of an extensive and intricate agenda. This includes events such as the conflict in Ukraine, the surging energy prices, the deliberate triggering of bankruptcies, the collapse of economic activity, and the widespread emergence of poverty, famine, and despair.

The following article highlights the perils of Cyber Warfare, a concern initially raised by the World Economic Forum in 2020.

While free content and knowledge is undoubtedly something amazing, creating and maintaining it requires a significant investment of time, money, and effort. I don't have the support of a massive media conglomerate; it's just me here. Regrettably, Klaus is still not providing me with free insects to eat. So, if you have the means and are willing to support my work by upgrading to a paid subscription, I would greatly appreciate it.

In 2021, the WEF organized a simulation exercise involving Cyber Attacks that envisioned a scenario where the Power Supply, Communications, Transportation, and the Internet were all compromised.

Klaus Schwab unequivocally conveyed, based on this “simulated scenario,” that a cyber-attack:

“… could bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole. The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyberattack.”

The movie “Leave the World Behind,” available on Netflix, has stirred controversy. This Hollywood production, based on Rumaan Alam's novel, is directed by Sam Esmail. It portrays the disintegration of society in the aftermath of a surprise attack by an unidentified assailant and foreshadows a cyberattack targeting the U.S. power grid.

Rumaan Alam's novel was published in October 2020, just a few months after the fear campaign and the March 11, 2020 Covid-19 lockdown. In an interview with The Guardian on October 26, 2021, Rumaan Alam stated:

“I’d never even heard the word coronavirus prior to February 2020. On a very basic level, the book dramatises being trapped in at home and not having enough information – and it happened to be published into a reality in which many readers felt that they were trapped in their homes and didn’t have enough information. So it’s a strange resonance. [namely]… the individual relationship to anxiety over the climate, the absurdity of the contemporary moment, our warped relationship to technology. People are thinking and talking about this stuff so it makes sense that there will be books about it.”

“Leave the World Behind” portrays the disintegration of society following a sudden assault by an unidentified aggressor. This cyberattack is anticipated to surpass the impact of the COVID pandemic, as repeatedly suggested in recent years by Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum (WEF).

Rather than advocating for preparedness ideologies or indulging in apocalyptic fantasies, “Leave the World Behind” provides a glimpse into the potential consequences of societal breakdowns and the enduring capacity of the human condition to grapple with both despair and resilience.

Whether “Leave the World Behind” serves as a conspiracy theory or a cautionary tale, it's essential to arm ourselves with both provisions and principles that can serve as a safeguard against any potential tyranny that may arise from orchestrated chaos. When we, the people, stand united, our strength remains unshakable. In environments where decentralization thrives, so too does the flame of freedom burn brightly.

This extends far beyond the confines of the film's narrative, delving into profound questions about the media's capacity to shape real-world events and the anxieties experienced by a society teetering on the edge of continuous change.

At the heart of the film lies the Sanford family, whose picturesque Hamptons vacation is shattered by enigmatic warnings of an impending disaster. As communication networks falter and the once-familiar infrastructure's hum diminishes, the Sanfords are confronted with a harsh truth: Their very existence is intricately entwined with a delicate web of interconnected systems hanging precariously on the brink of collapse.

This vulnerability, a reflection of numerous facets of contemporary life, emerges as the film's central theme, serving as a stark reminder of our dependence on electricity, the internet, and intricate logistical supply chains that now appear susceptible to disruption with disconcerting ease.

To me, “Leave the World Behind” transcends being a mere cautionary tale; it serves as a catalyst for posing uncomfortable questions. Some speculate that it may even be construed as a form of predictive programming, given its inclusion of cryptic signs and symbols. Predictive programming theory posits that media subtly introduces future agendas in a way that audiences unconsciously assimilate without resistance.

Like many others, I hold the belief that the film might be offering a glimpse into what globalists, such as the World Economic Forum, envision for our future.

Archie, the Sanfords' son, donning a T-shirt adorned with the word “Obey” throughout the film, introduces an element of suspicion into the narrative. The “Obey” T-shirt references the 1988 John Carpenter film “They Live,” which similarly explores society's fixation on mass media and the public's incapacity to perceive the true nature of external influences. In essence, people remained oblivious to reality as it truly existed.

Is Archie's “Obey” T-shirt merely an acknowledgment of youthful rebellion, or does it portend a chilling future where compliance becomes paramount in the face of impending chaos?

Adding more complexity to the discussion is the film's production company, Higher Ground Productions, co-founded by Barack and Michelle Obama. This association, according to many, further suggests an underlying agenda.

The Sanfords' heavy reliance on modern-day comforts and technology serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of complacency and exposes the fragility of our existence. In stark contrast, Mr. Scott, the mysterious neighbor, personifies preparedness and resourcefulness. His meticulous stockpiling of supplies and proactive approach vividly demonstrate the potency of personal responsibility when confronted with a crisis.

“Leave the World Behind” refrains from preaching preparedness ideologies or indulging in apocalyptic fantasies. Instead, it provides a window into the potential consequences of societal breakdowns and the human condition's remarkable capacity for both despair and resilience. It encourages viewers to confront their own vulnerabilities, fostering a critical examination of our reliance on interconnected systems and underscoring the significance of building individual and communal resources.

Currently, there is no definitive evidence suggesting that the creators and director of “Leave the World Behind” were aware of the World Economic Forum's July 2020 simulation of a cyberattack. This issue warrants additional scrutiny and investigation.

Jeremy Jurgens, the Managing Director and Head of the WEF's Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, articulates, “I believe that there will be another crisis. It will be more substantial and swifter than the COVID-19 crisis. Its impact will be more profound, leading to more significant economic and social consequences.”

Following the 2020 Cyber Polygon Simulation, a second simulation took place in 2021. What could the globalists be planning next?

The 2021 WEF Cyber Polygon simulation had a noticeable “conflicting” geopolitical angle: The event was overseen by Russia's Prime Minister, Mikhail Mishustin, and the WEF extended invitations to several Russian financial institutions, media outlets, and communication entities.

Forty-eight countries actively participated in the event, accompanied by 41 partners, with 10 of them hailing from Russia and Kazakhstan. These notable partners included News Agency TASS, NTV, Sberbank (Russia's largest bank and a prominent global financial institution), Mail.ru Group (Russia's largest internet provider), MTS (Russia's leading telecommunications group), and the State Legal Department of the Omsk Region in Siberia, alongside influential banking and financial institutions from Kazakhstan, among others.

Furthermore, the Training Program's assumptions revolved around potential cyberattacks orchestrated by terrorist hackers.

It is well-documented that the World Economic Forum (WEF) has played a significant role in supporting the military agenda of the US-NATO coalition concerning Ukraine.

Given that this Cyber Polygon event took place less than eight months prior to the commencement of the Ukraine War, questions arise about whether its intent was to sow political divisions within the Russian Federation. This was achieved by forming partnerships with influential Russian media, communication, banking, and financial entities, among others.

Notably, there was no representation from the People's Republic of China at the Cyber Polygon Simulation in July 2021. One might ponder whether this event was designed to foster tensions between China and Russia, and whether cyberattacks are being contemplated as part of a broader global military agenda.

---

In November 2023 the Financial Elites shifted from “simulating scenarios” to outright “implementation,” entrusting the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) to serve as the flag-bearer for the aggressive push towards All-Digitization.

If everything around us is run by digital signals controlled by the Financial Elites, one or a few switches can turn off our different networks: water supply, electricity, gas, all kinds of energy, food supply, fuel deliveries, traffic signals, all transportation, all communication, the money in our accounts, and much more.

Now, China has officially introduced 6G, a next-generation ultra-high-speed Internet backbone, as reported by SHINE News.

The specific purpose of 6G, and what distinguishes it from the capabilities of 5G, remains undisclosed to the public. Additionally, there is a lack of information regarding the health implications of 6G, with no public disclosure of any related studies.

To provide context, Qualcomm describes 5G as the fifth generation of mobile networks, representing a new global wireless standard following 1G, 2G, 3G, and 4G networks. Its primary goal is to create a network that can connect virtually everyone and everything, including machines, objects, and devices. However, discussions about the health effects of 5G have been limited, even though some studies have been conducted, their results have not been made public.

The 6th Generation Mobile Network, or 6G, boasts speeds approximately 100 times faster and significantly more powerful than 5G, enabling the comprehensive digitization of various aspects of life.

Operating within the terahertz frequency bands, 6G is anticipated to offer a peak data rate of 1,000 gigabits per second, with air latency below 100 microseconds. In the comparison of 5G versus 6G network speed, 6G is expected to outpace 5G by a staggering 100-fold, along with improved reliability and broader network coverage.

It is a race for humanity, pitting life against the threat of its demise. Should we awaken and take countermeasures, the globalists behind UN Agenda 2030 and The Great Reset may face a bleak outcome.

This is why the entire UN system is eagerly pushing for global digitization, aiming for a swift transition. Their urgency stems from the concern that there shall not be ample time for the masses, us, the people, to awaken and reclaim our world and lives before it becomes too late.

The Financial, Military, IT, Media, Pharma Complex (FMIMPC) has nominated UNCTAD within the United Nations system. It is the political body ostensibly led by Washington but ultimately under the control of the powerful FMIMPC. This nomination designates UNCTAD as the leading force, at least for the time being, driving the relentless push for full-digitization.

Contrary to its original mandate, which primarily served developing nations, particularly in the Global South, UNCTAD is now set to level the digital playing field for the entire UN system. This transformation was officially announced through a Geneva Press Release on November 15, 2023, introducing its e-Week scheduled from December 4 to 8, 2023. This marks a significant overhaul of its annual e-Commerce Week series, initiated in 2016.

UNCTAD's Secretary-General, Rebecca Grynspan, articulated the organization's stance by stating, “The digital economy plays a critical role in advancing development goals at all levels. Through inclusive and multi-stakeholder discussions, we can together build a global digital future that works for all.”

UNCTAD's renowned e-Week is named “UNCTAD e-Week 2023 to Mobilize Global Support for a More Inclusive Digital Economy.” Subtitled as “More than 3,000 stakeholders from 130 countries will examine how to turn digital opportunities into shared development gains and close existing divides for a sustainable future.”

The press release is replete with catchphrases, pleasantries, and ambiguous rhetoric, characteristic of globalist discourse, often leaving one to ponder their actual significance. For instance, it states, “The Conference is themed 'Shaping the Future of the digital economy,' with topics encompassing over 150 sessions dedicated to addressing critical issues related to digitalization. These subjects range from platform governance, the developmental impact of artificial intelligence (AI), environmentally conscious digital practices, to fostering female empowerment through digital entrepreneurship and expediting digital readiness in developing nations.”

Among the notable high-level speakers are Amandeep Sing Gill, the UN Secretary General’s Envoy on Technology, Nizar Ben Neji, Tunisia's Minister of Communication and Technologies, and Henry Puna, Secretary General of the Pacific Islands Forum, along with other prominent figures in the field of information technology.

The event also underscores the immense potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI), emphasizing the urgency of addressing emerging technologies, particularly the rapid proliferation of AI, which is revolutionizing the digital economy.

Evidently, the blueprint for our collective future, the future of the people, is being crafted as a digital future, devoid of broad consultation. The UN entity and its influential controllers are positioning themselves to dictate the path forward for us, but only if we acquiesce.

The focus on leveling the digital playing field centers on the substantial data flows within the digital economy. It calls for global governance responses to rectify market concentration and the unequal distribution of benefits. An alarming statistic is revealed, where over 70% of global digital advertising revenue is cornered by just five digital platforms.

However, when it comes to addressing this issue, the proposed course of action appears minimal. This is largely because these five digital giants - Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft - already exert significant control over the world, managing nearly $9 trillion in IT communication.

The agenda also introduces another catchphrase: “Harnessing the digital promise.” This concept anticipates and assures that the data-driven digital economy has the potential to stimulate economic growth, foster innovation, and eliminate geographical and physical barriers to inclusive development for countries.

Lastly, there is the concluding piece of this narrative - “Digitalization for development.” UNCTAD's e-Week platform, intended for constructive and inclusive dialogue, aims to generate insights and actions that can contribute to global initiatives, most notably the ongoing UN Global Digital Compact. This initiative seeks to catalyze an open, free, and secure digital future for all, culminating in the UN's 2024 Summit of the Future.

In the backdrop of multiple global crises unfolding on geopolitical, economic, and climate fronts, it is essential to forge stronger partnerships. Nations must make crucial decisions to chart equitable and sustainable digitalization paths for development.

This may entail discussions about the controversial and potentially unlawful 2019 compact between Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum and the United Nations, as well as the deliberate global conflicts, chaos, and violence perpetuated to maintain control, sow confusion, and distract the population.

The true power to shape this world has always lain in your hands. Choose well!

When we delve beyond the surface and decode the layers of slogans and digital rhetoric, it becomes evident that we are hurtling towards a state of digital subjugation at an increasingly rapid pace.

It is incredibly easy to destabilize a society operating primarily in the digital realm. Consider the implications: If every facet of our existence is governed by digital signals under the control of the “elite”, particularly the Financial, Military, IT, Media, Pharma Complex (FMIMPC), a mere flick of a switch or a few keystrokes could disrupt multiple vital networks:

• Water supply

• Electricity

• Gas

• All forms of energy

• Food distribution

• Fuel deliveries

• Traffic management

• All modes of transportation

• Communication channels

• Financial resources in our accounts

The repercussions on people's lives defy adequate description. It is worth noting that achieving their depopulation agenda would not necessarily require a catastrophic event like a nuclear explosion. Even those who wield control over these digital switches would themselves be at risk, as they are dependent on the very systems they manipulate.

If you don’t want to commit to a paid subscription but still wish to support me, you can donate an amount you choose here. Most of my content is free to read, so it is greatly appreciated. Thank you!