The Unspoken War: The Blueprint to Control

The Guide to Government and Economic Interaction for Turning You Into Cattle, Obedient to Their Agenda.

This guide delves into the complex interplay between government and economic forces, shedding light on how these dynamics can shape individuals and societies. By delving into these intricate webs, it aims to provide insight into the mechanisms that can sometimes influence individuals' behaviors and perspectives, leading to a sense of conformity and alignment with certain agendas.

Contents at a Glance

1. Securing the Veil

2. Dawn of Control

3. In the Shadow of 1954

4. The Dominion of Energy

5. Dissecting the Silent Arsenal

6. The Master Plan

7. The Triad of Energy Principles

8. Illuminating the Energy Matrix

9. The Elite's Power Principle

10. The Illusion of Capital

11. The Point of No Return

12. The Model of Control

13. Industry in Chains

14. Mapping the E-Model

15. Tides of Time: Oscillations of Doom

16. Defining Industries and Households

17. Societal Amplifiers

18. Prime Tactical Moves

    ---

This document serves as a historical record of the concealed Third World War waged by influential financial, intelligence, and governmental entities, utilizing covert biological and psychological methods and employing what are referred to as “silent weapons.”

Enclosed within this article is an introductory portrayal of this hidden struggle, encapsulating its tactics, strategies, and weaponry.

SECURING THE VEIL

Engaging in discourse concerning societal manipulation, the mechanization of entire societies, and the orchestration of social automated systems (referred to as 'silent weapons') on a national or global scale unavoidably implies ambitious goals of controlling and extinguishing human existence, effectively imposing servitude and extermination.

This manual, by its very nature, is a symbolic manifesto. The need for its confidentiality is indisputable. Otherwise, it risks being identified as an official proclamation of domestic warfare. Moreover, whenever an individual or a group of individuals wielding substantial power employ such knowledge and methodologies for the purpose of economic conquest—without the public's full comprehension or endorsement—a state of internal warfare must be acknowledged between said individuals or groups and the public at large.

Resolving the intricate dilemmas of the present demands an approach characterized by unabashed candor, without indulging in hesitations rooted in religious, moral, or cultural constructs.

Your inclusion in this endeavor results from your capacity to objectively scrutinize human society, dissecting it with detached precision, and yet share your assessments and conclusions with peers of comparable intellectual caliber without forsaking discretion or humility. Such virtues stand to serve your own best interests. Do not waver from them.

DAWN OF CONTROL

The roots of silent weapon technology trace back to the genesis of Operations Research (O.R.), a strategic and tactical methodology incubated within Military Management in England during the crucible of World War II. Inceptionally, Operations Research was designed to unravel the riddles of strategic and tactical challenges entwined with air and land defense, aiming to optimally allocate finite military resources against foreign adversaries (in essence, logistics).

Yet, it didn't take long for discerning minds in positions of influence to fathom the potential of these methodologies for a more audacious purpose – the absolute governance of a society. However, achieving this ambition necessitated more sophisticated tools.

The art of social engineering, akin to scrutinizing and automating a complex mechanism, hinges on meticulously correlating ceaselessly shifting economic data. Hence, the requirement for a high-speed computerized data-processing system, capable of surging ahead of societal dynamics and predicting their inclinations towards subjugation, emerged as imperative.

Early relay computers proved sluggish, but salvation materialized in the form of the electronic computer, conceived in 1946 by J. Presper Eckert and John W. Mauchly.

A quantum leap emerged with the unveiling of the simplex method of linear programming in 1947, sculpted by the visionary mathematician George B. Dantzig.

Then, in 1948, the transistor, bestowed upon the world by J. Bardeen, W.H. Brattain, and W. Shockley, heralded the dawn of a new age in computer technology, fueling the promise of expanded horizons while consuming less space and energy.

With these monumental inventions at their disposal, the elite echelons of power harbored suspicions that they could steer the course of the entire world with a mere tap of a button.

In swift succession, the Rockefeller Foundation joined the fray, extending a four-year grant to Harvard College in 1948. The funding bolstered the Harvard Economic Research Project, aimed at dissecting the intricate structure of the American economy. The United States Air Force followed suit the subsequent year, endorsing the cause.

The grant's term came to a close in 1952, and in the shadows of that juncture, an exclusive conclave of the elite convened, delving into the next phase of their social engineering initiatives. The Harvard project bore prolific fruit, its impact punctuated by the publication of select findings in 1953. These findings tantalizingly hinted at the practicality of engineering economic, and by extension, social paradigms (as evidenced by “Studies in the Structure of the American Economy” – copyright 1953, Wassily Leontief, International Science Press Inc., White Plains, New York).

Thus, conceived within the latter half of the 1940s, the nascent machinery of the Silent War manifested, akin to a resplendent showcase exhibit, replete with gold-plated hardware, by the year 1954.

The unveiling of the maser in 1954 promised access to untapped reservoirs of fusion atomic energy through heavy hydrogen present in seawater. This presented a potential goldmine of boundless social power, lying tantalizingly just a few decades ahead. The allure was irresistible.

And thus, in the secrecy-shrouded year of 1954, the International Elite discreetly sounded the clarion for the commencement of the Silent War.

While a partial unveiling of the silent weapons system is presently unfolding, the advent of the Internet, their most potent instrument, has unexpectedly turned against them. Nonetheless, the advancement of this new arsenal has largely proceeded without significant hindrance.

This compendium stands as a testament, marking the soon 70th anniversary since the advent of the Silent War. In this span, this covert domestic conflict has achieved numerous victories across the global arena, each one a strategic conquest in its own right.

IN THE SHADOW OF 1954

Amid the shadows of 1954, it stood as an inescapable truth, an unspoken acknowledgment, that those occupying the highest echelons of authority understood with uncanny clarity – the cradle of power, once shrouded in secrecy, was now vulnerable to eventual revelation. A mere handful of decades loomed on the horizon, a countdown to the moment when the general populace would unravel the enigma and disrupt the delicate equilibrium. The very components that underpinned this novel technology of silent weapons lay equally attainable in a public utopia, mirroring their accessibility in creating private enclaves of paradise.

At the epicenter of this burgeoning evolution lay the paramount issue – that of dominion, of establishing supremacy and holding sway. Yet, the fulcrum around which this issue pivoted was none other than the profound and intricate domain of energy sciences.

THE DOMINION OF ENERGY

Energy, the very pulse that animates every facet of our world, is acknowledged as the ultimate orchestrator of activity on Earth. The realm of natural science embarks on a quest to fathom the founts and governance of natural energy, while social science, often encapsulated as economics, embarks on a parallel journey to decipher the sources and mastery of social energy. Both disciplines are intrinsically akin to bookkeeping systems, intricate mathematical tapestries that weave the fabric of control. Hence, the profound revelation surfaces: mathematics, the quintessential language of order, emerges as the primary energy science. And in this universe of calculations, the role of the bookkeeper assumes a regal stature – for within ignorance of the methodology of bookkeeping, lies the potential to wield dominion.

Scientific exploration, in all its facets, serves as a conduit to an ultimate goal. Knowledge assumes the role of the means, while control emerges as the coveted end. Beyond this nexus, one central query endures: Who shall emerge as the inheritor of this orchestrated power?

In the year 1954, this question unfurled as the paramount dilemma. Although the veneer of so-called “moral quandaries” veiled the discourse, in the grand scheme governed by the laws of natural selection, a consensus materialized: a society – be it a nation or the world at large – that relinquishes the deployment of its cognitive faculties stands little above animals bereft of intellect. Such societies mirror beasts of burden, willingly trading their intelligence for servitude, existing as both workforce and sustenance.

It was following this understanding, in the interest of propelling forth a future marked by global order, tranquility, and harmony, that a clandestine war took root against the American populace. The ultimate objective? A permanent transference of the wellspring of natural and social energy, colloquially understood as wealth, from the hands of the undisciplined multitude to the deserving few – the self-disciplined, responsible, and esteemed elite.

For the realization of this profound shift, the creation, securing, and application of new instruments were deemed essential. These instruments, however, differed remarkably from conventional weaponry, concealing themselves in a cloak of subtlety and sophistication so profound that they earned the epithet “silent weapons.”

In the dénouement, the grand aspiration of economic research, as steered by the captains of capital (the banking elite) and the custodians of commodities (goods) and services, unfurls as the establishment of an economy characterized by total predictability and manipulability.

To sculpt an economy governed by utter predictability, the lower echelons of society demand complete control, necessitating their domestication, training, and harnessing to enduring societal responsibilities – roles bestowed from an early age, before curiosity could fuel dissent. Such conformity necessitates the disintegration of the traditional lower-class family structure, driven by an escalating occupation of parents and the advent of government-run childcare centers for the children left adrift by occupied parents.

The educational nourishment bestowed upon the lower strata must be a pale shadow of its true potential, casting a veil of ignorance that isolates the inferior from the superior. This strategic ignorance shackles even the brightest minds of the lower class, constraining their escape from their predetermined destinies. This pattern of subjugation forms the cornerstone of societal equilibrium, birthing a semblance of order, serenity, and peace – all for the benefit of the ruling elite.

DISSECTING THE SILENT ARSENAL

All that is anticipated from a conventional weapon becomes a silent weapon's inherent purpose, albeit channeled through its distinctive mode of operation.

This weapon doesn't discharge bullets; instead, it fires scenarios – propelled not by chemical explosions, but by intricate data processing. It emerges from the fusion of data fragments, not the ignition of gunpowder; it's wielded not by a marksman, but by a computer programmer; it takes its cues not from a military general, but from a banking magnate.

Silent weapons trade in invisible reverberations; no deafening explosions, no visible physical or mental scars, no overt disruption of daily lives. Yet beneath the deceptive quietude, this weapon resonates with a distinct 'noise.' It inflicts subtle physical and mental harm, it stealthily corrodes the fabric of social existence. But this veneer of secrecy ensures that it remains imperceptible to the uninitiated, the untrained eye.

The masses remain oblivious, incapable of comprehending this cryptic weapon's assault – a paradox born from its technical complexity. They might sense an unsettling disquiet, but this discomfort emerges from a realm so nebulous that they lack the vocabulary to articulate it. The dilemma is exacerbated by their incapacity to counteract it with intelligence, to craft a rational response. The irony lies in their inability to seek aid, to band together in self-defense.

The insidious nature of the silent weapon lies in its gradual deployment. Society adapts, accommodating its encroachment on personal lives, unaware of the pressure being subtly applied – a psychological grip, often masquerading as economic duress. The pressure persists, ratcheting up until the breaking point is reached, and the veneer of equilibrium shatters.

Thus, the silent weapon assumes the form of a biological warfare, a siege on the vitality, freedom, and autonomy of a society's individuals. It targets the very sources of their natural and social energy, exploiting their physical, mental, and emotional vulnerabilities. It's a mechanism that thrives on understanding, manipulation, and exploitation, eroding the very essence of strength that underpins humanity's existence.

THE MASTER PLAN

The tapestry of today's silent weapons technology finds its roots in a seemingly unassuming seed – an idea that was unearthed, eloquently articulated, and wielded with exceptional efficacy by a man of profound influence, Mayer Amschel Rothschild. Within the contours of this idea lay the missing component of economic theory, a revelation known as economic inductance. Yet, it's imperative to acknowledge that the terminology of the 21st century was foreign to Mr. Rothschild's musings. His insights germinated in a different era, and the evolution of mathematical analysis awaited the dawn of the Second Industrial Revolution, the ascendancy of mechanical and electronic theories, and the culmination of the electronic computer's invention before it could be harnessed to effectively govern the world's economic trajectory.

THE TRIAD OF ENERGY PRINCIPLES

Within the realm of energy systems, three fundamental concepts stand as pillars of understanding: potential energy, kinetic energy, and energy dissipation. These principles find their counterparts in the realm of physical systems – idealized, pristine manifestations known as passive components.

In the tapestry of physical mechanics, potential energy manifests through the quality of elasticity or stiffness, epitomized by the tautness of a spring. In the realm of electronics, this potential energy finds its dwelling in a capacitor, a vessel for storing this potency. However, instead of elasticity or stiffness, this property is baptized as “capacitance.”

Kinetic energy, a testament to the essence of motion, finds its anchor in the realm of inertia or mass within the universe of physical mechanics. A mass in motion, akin to a spinning flywheel, symbolizes this kinetic energy. Transitioning into electronics, the baton is passed to an inductor, an element nestled within a magnetic field. In this domain, the appellation shifts from inertia to “inductance.”

Energy dissipation, encapsulating the transformation of energy into heat, is a province governed by the forces of friction or resistance in the arena of physical mechanics. Dashpots or analogous devices perform this energy alchemy. In the realm of electronics, the mantle falls upon the shoulders of a component known either as a resistor or a conductor. The former, “resistor,” often denotes the more ideal instrument, such as a wire, serving as a conduit for the efficient transmission of electronic energy from one juncture to another. Resistance or conductance are the measures by which this property is quantified.

Economic landscapes mirror these three energy concepts:

• Economic Capacitance: An embodiment of potential energy is reflected in the financial capital realm, encompassing money, stock, inventory, and investments in tangible assets.

• Economic Conductance: Analogous to kinetic energy, this facet is encapsulated in the flow coefficients of goods, signifying the fluidity of production.

• Economic Inductance: Drawing parallels to energy dissipation, this attribute emerges from the influence of the population on industrial output, a web of services intertwining with societal demands.

It's a marvel to recognize that the rich tapestry of mathematical theory spun in the study of one energy system instantaneously finds application within any other energy system. The universe of mechanics, electronics, and beyond unfurls its secrets, unveiling the interconnectedness between disciplines like mechanics and economics.

THE ELITE'S POWER PRINCIPLE

Within the annals of history, a seminal discovery unfurled at the hands of Mr. Mayer Amschel Rothschild – a discovery that epitomized the very bedrock of power, influence, and dominion over human will, channeled through the intricacies of economics. The essence of this revelation can be distilled into a succinct axiom: “Assume the guise of power, and others will willingly bestow it upon you.”

Mr. Rothschild unraveled a truth that reverberates through the corridors of time: currency and deposit loan accounts hold an aura of power, an aura that can be wielded to beckon individuals into the folds of surrender. It mirrors the phenomenon of inductance in the realm of physics, with individuals mirroring a magnetic field. Under the tantalizing allure of promised affluence, people were prompted to relinquish their tangible wealth for a mere pledge of future prosperity – an exchange that bypassed genuine compensation for a promise of greater riches.

Ingeniously, collateral in the form of tangible assets was pledged in return for loans bestowed in the guise of promissory notes. Mr. Rothschild ingeniously discovered that he could proffer more notes than the assets backing them, as long as the persuasive allure of someone else's gold could captivate his clientele.

Individuals and even governments fell within the scope of Mr. Rothschild's loan dispensations. The cycle he orchestrated was as intricate as it was ingenious. The initial issuance of promissory notes engendered a climate of overconfidence, a prelude to the next stage. Subsequently, currency supply was strangled, the system's reins tightened, and contracts invoked to seize the pledged collateral. This orchestrated dance would then repeat, each time tugging the strings of control tighter.

These maneuvers weren't mere financial symphonies; they held the potential to ignite geopolitical conflagrations. Wars could be ignited, their flames fanned through these orchestrated pressures. The flow of currency could be throttled, granting the wielder dominion over the victor. A strategic maneuver unfolded: governments offering control of their economic domains gained Mr. Rothschild's support.

The dark ballet of debt collection was orchestrated with a twist – economic aid flowed to the debtors' adversaries, ensuring the harvest of debts. This economic methodology channeled unprecedented profit into Mr. Rothschild's coffers, exponentially fueling his wealth expansion.

In the labyrinthine corridors of currency control, Mr. Rothschild discerned the voracious appetite of public greed. It emboldened governments to decree the printing of currency beyond the constraints of tangible backing – a dance with the devil that led to a perilous spiral of inflation, transcending the bounds of precious metals or the production of tangible goods and services.

THE ILLUSION OF CAPITAL

In the complex labyrinth of economic structures, a peculiar masquerade unfolds – a deceptive dance where credit poses as an entity dubbed “currency.” Yet, under the veil of its name, this credit parades as capital, though, in truth, it is a negation of capital, casting a shadow of negative capital. The veneer of service conceals a more sinister reality – indebtedness, an intricate web of economic inductance camouflaged as economic capacitance. Unbalanced, it emerges as a force that, if left unchecked, will find equilibrium through the negation of the population – a haunting echo of war and genocide. The true repositories of value, encompassing all goods and services, constitute the bedrock of capital – the gross national product. Currency can be minted up to this echelon, still portraying economic capacitance. However, when this threshold is exceeded, the fabric unravels, yielding economic inductance, akin to the influx of notes of indebtedness.

In this orchestrated symphony, war emerges as an unsettling equilibrium mechanism – a counterbalance achieved through the annihilation of true creditors, the unsuspecting public who have been artfully trained to exchange genuine value for a façade of inflated currency. The residual vestiges of natural resources then become the backdrop against which the system leans for sustenance and regeneration.

Mr. Rothschild's revelation lay in the realization that currency wasn't merely a medium of transaction; it bestowed him with the power to meticulously reconfigure the economic landscape in his favor. It enabled the maneuvering of economic inductance into strategic positions that would foment optimal instability and oscillation, perpetuating the cycle of control.

The ultimate mastery of economic control, however, remained elusive until the advent of an era marked by copious data and the emergence of high-speed computing prowess. This technological evolution furnished the tools needed to vigilantly monitor the convulsions within the economic fabric, orchestrated by shock-inducing price fluctuations and the relentless proliferation of paper energy credits – a testament to paper inductance and inflation's forceful embrace.

Want more? I have more!

Unlock a Wealth of Insights: Gain Full Access to this Exclusive Article and Others by Subscribing to My Premium Membership.

Your support as a paid subscriber enables me to continue producing high-quality, independent journalism on this important topics. As an ad-free platform, I rely on the support of my readers to keep this content accessible and free from external influence.

THE POINT OF NO RETURN

The realm of aviation emerged as the crucible wherein economic engineering found its most profound evolution, fostered by the calculus of shock testing. This innovative process orchestrates a dazzling dance wherein a projectile is propelled from an airframe poised on the ground, its recoiling impulse meticulously monitored by vibration transducers seamlessly integrated with the airframe and meticulously wired to chart recorders.

In the intricate symphony of recoil, echoes and reflections emerge, painting a tapestry of critical vibrations that thread through the airframe's very fabric. These vibrations, akin to the resonant notes in a symphony, hold immense significance – they can manifest as echoes of the engine's vibrations, or the ethereal aeolian vibrations that caress the wings. And at times, a harmonious convergence of both engine and aeolian vibrations can occur, forging a sinister alliance that may culminate in the airframe's self-destruction mid-flight.

Within this complex orchestration, the engineering marvels of aviation open doors to a profound realization: the strengths and frailties of the airframe's structure, when viewed through the prism of vibrational energy, can be deftly unveiled and purposefully manipulated. This revelation, rooted in the intricacies of resonance and energy transference, offers a tantalizing array of possibilities to those skilled in the art of economic engineering.

Application in the Arena of Economics

Transplanting the methodology of airframe shock testing into the realm of economic engineering unveils a breathtaking spectacle – a choreography wherein the prices of commodities are jolted, while the ensuing ripples of public consumer reactions are closely monitored. These economic echoes, akin to sonorous waves, are then subjected to the discerning gaze of theoretical computers, peeling back the layers to unveil the psycho-economic architecture of the society. This intricate process unfurls the elaborate tapestry of partial differential and difference matrices, heralding the delineation of the family household's essence and enabling its appraisal as a dynamic economic entity – a consumptive structure of boundless energy exchange.

With these revelations, the prospects expand further, enabling the anticipation and manipulation of the household's responses to future shocks. Society transforms into a precisely calibrated organism, its trajectory expertly guided by the meticulous strings of a computer-regulated social energy bookkeeping system.

Yet, as the narrative unfurls, the tale turns even more mesmerizing. Each constituent of this intricate structure eventually falls under the sway of computerized control. Personal preferences, previously concealed within the individual's psyche, are uncovered through a dance of computer associations – think the universal product code (UPC), those zebra-striped symbols adorning packages. These seemingly innocuous codes weave a web, intertwining with the very essence of identified consumers – an alliance cemented through credit cards and, in the near future, indelible "tattooed" body numbers, veiled from the naked eye by ambient light.

Economics, an intricate dance of wealth, resources, and services, extends the tendrils of natural energy systems into the social domain. Just as in the domains of physics and electronics, economics possesses its own triad of passive components, hidden in plain sight. Yet, marred by skewed wealth distribution and plagued by a dearth of communication and data, economics remained the final frontier where the understanding of these enigmatic components took root.

Within this intricate framework, energy reigns supreme – the lifeblood coursing through all endeavors on this terrestrial canvas. Thus, it becomes apparent that securing dominion over energy, along with raw materials, goods, and services, is the key to forging a global apparatus of subservience, shackling humanity within the chains of labor. To ascend to this coveted throne of control, one must wield a first-strike capability within the realm of economics. To cement one's supremacy, mastery over the science of economic control becomes paramount, marking the journey towards engineering the world economy itself.

Within this grand tapestry of ambition, one must strive to obscure the threads that tie economics to its fellow energy sciences – an endeavor necessitated to ensure that the public never forges the mathematical or logical connection between them. Yet, as the sands of time continue to trickle, this endeavor grows more arduous. The emergence of a new breed of programmer/economists, armed with the revelations stemming from Harvard's seminal work in 1948, hovers on the horizon. Their ascension marks a reckoning, a moment when the profound implications of this knowledge might burgeon forth.

How swiftly they can sound the clarion call to the public hinges on the efficacy of our efforts to commandeer the media, to divert the course of education, and to enthrall the masses with trivialities of little consequence. As the stage is set for this grand narrative, the fate of economic dominion hangs in the balance, while the very fabric of society shivers under the weight of decisions made and destinies foretold.

THE MODEL OF CONTROL

The Harvard Economic Research Project (1948-) was an extension of World War II Operations Research. Its purpose was to discover the science of controlling an economy: at first the American economy, and then the world economy. It was felt that with sufficient mathematical foundation and data, it would be nearly as easy to predict and control the trend of an economy as to predict and control the trajectory of a projectile. Such has proven to be the case. Moreover, the economy has been transformed into a guided missile on target.

The immediate aim of the Harvard project was to discover the economic structure, what forces change that structure, how the behavior of the structure can be predicted, and how it can be manipulated. What was needed was well-organized knowledge of the mathematical structures and interrelationships of investment, production, distribution, and consumption.

To make a short story of it all, it was discovered that an economy obeyed the same laws as electricity and that all the mathematical theory and practical and computer know-how developed for the electronic field could be directly applied in the study of economics. This discovery was not openly declared, and its more subtle implications were and are kept a closely guarded secret, for example that in an economic model, human life is measured in dollars, and that the electric spark generated when opening a switch connected to an active inductor is mathematically analogous to the initiation of war.

The greatest hurdle which theoretical economists faced was the accurate description of the household as an industry. This is a challenge because consumer purchases are a matter of choice, which in turn is influenced by income, price, and other economic factors.

This hurdle was cleared in an indirect and statistically approximate way by an application of shock testing to determine the current characteristics, called current technical coefficients, of a household industry.

Finally, because problems in theoretical electronics can be translated very easily into problems of theoretical electronics, and the solution translated back again, it follows that only a book of language translation and concept definition needed to be written for economics. The remainder could be gotten from standard works on mathematics and electronics. This makes the publication of books on advanced economics unnecessary, and greatly simplifies project security.

INDUSTRY IN CHAINS

Imagine a quintessential industry as a sophisticated mechanism, ingeniously designed to receive a variety of values from diverse sectors, seamlessly molding them into a singular, targeted product, primed for distribution across other industries. This intricate mechanism involves numerous inputs harmonizing to yield a solitary output. Yet, what is commonly perceived as a singular industry by the public, is in truth an intricate industrial complex, where a confluence of industries converges beneath a shared roof, collectively generating one or more commodities.

A pure industry, one with a singular output, can be illustrated with a simplified circuit block:

A more intricate network comprising three industries could be depicted thus:

Industry Network node serves as a focal point for the aggregation and dispersion of flow. Node #3 gathers from industry #3 and disperses to industries #1 and #3. In cases where industry #3 fabricates chairs, a flow from industry #3 back to industry #3 signifies the usage of its own product output, perhaps as office furniture. Consequently, this flow can be summarized using the following equations:

Industries are categorized into three distinct classes by their output:

• Class #1 – Capital (resources)

• Class #2 – Goods (commodities or dissipative use)

• Class #3 – Services (population-driven actions)

Class #1 industries manifest at three tiers:

• Nature: Origins of energy and raw materials.

• Government: issuance of currency equal to the gross national product (GNP), and the expansion of currency beyond GNP.

• Banking: lending money for interest, and the augmentation (inflation/counterfeiting) of economic value via deposit loan accounts.

Class #2 industries come to life as creators of tangible or consumer-based products, a facet typically recognized and labeled by the public as “industry.”

Class #3 industries encompass services rather than tangible products as their output. These industries encompass (1) households and (2) governments. Their output takes the form of mechanized human activity, and their foundation rests upon the population.

To encapsulate the entire economic framework, envision a model composed of three interconnected industries, with their respective outputs designated as (1) capital, (2) goods, and (3) services. Yet, within this model, a challenge emerges: it fails to depict the intricate interplay, let's say, between the textile and ferrous metal industries. The dilemma arises from both the textile and ferrous metal sectors being confined within a solitary category known as the “goods industry.” Consequently, through this amalgamation and consolidation of these two sectors under a singular system block, their unique economic identities become obscured.

MAPPING THE E-MODEL

Within the tapestry of a national economy, the harmonious interplay of production, distribution, consumption, and investment weaves intricate patterns. If all these elements, including labor and human activities, are quantified with numerical values using a common unit like dollars, a parallel can be drawn to an electrical circuit where current flows. Such a representation transforms the economic flow into an electronic current coursing through a circuit, rendering its behavior foreseeable and manipulable with remarkable accuracy.

Just as the three essential passive components in electronics—the capacitor, the resistor, and the inductor—find their counterparts in economics as the pure industries of capital, goods, and services, respectively, these parallelisms resonate with profound insights:

• Economic capacitance embodies the accumulation of capital in diverse forms.

• Economic conductance mirrors the level of material conductivity required for goods production.

• Economic inductance reflects the inertia inherent in the motion of economic value—a societal phenomenon referred to as services.

An electrical inductor, exemplified by a coil or wire, showcases an electric current as its principal manifestation and a magnetic field as its secondary attribute, akin to inertia. Paralleling this, an economic inductor manifests a flow of economic value as its central feature, with a population field acting as its secondary attribute of inertia. When the flow of economic value, represented by monetary transactions, declines, the population field adjusts to ensure the continuity of economic value circulation — an extreme manifestation being conflicts like war.

This societal inertia is a reflection of consumer spending habits, expected living standards, and other factors relating to self-preservation.

Considerations for Inductive Effects:

1. Population Size

2. Magnitude of Government's Economic Activities

3. Method of Financing Government Endeavors

Let's break down the explanations for these concepts in the context of the economic analogies provided:

1. Charge (Coulombs - Dollars):

In the electrical realm, charge is the fundamental property of matter that gives rise to electromagnetic interactions. In the economic analogy, charge represents the basic unit of value in the economic system, which, in context, is denoted in dollars. This value signifies the wealth or currency possessed by individuals or entities within the economic system.

2. Flow/Current (Amperes - Dollars of Flow per Year):

Flow or current in an electrical circuit refers to the movement of charged particles (like electrons) through a conductor. In the economic analogy, flow or current represents the rate at which economic value (money) moves through the system. It's measured in terms of dollars of flow per year, indicating the amount of currency exchanged or transferred over a specific period.

3. Motivating Force (Volts - Dollars, Output Demand):

In an electrical circuit, voltage represents the driving force that pushes charged particles through a conductor. In the economic analogy, motivating force equates to the demand for goods and services in the market. This demand is reflected in dollars, signifying the monetary value associated with consumers' desire for products.

4. Conductance (Amperes per Volt - Dollars of Flow per Year per Dollar Demand):

Conductance in electrical circuits signifies the ease with which current flows through a conductor under the influence of voltage. In the economic analogy, conductance corresponds to the efficiency of the flow of economic value (money) in response to demand (motivating force). It's measured as amperes per volt, indicating the rate at which money flows per unit of demand (dollars of flow per year per dollar demand).

5. Capacitance (Coulombs per Volt - Dollars of Production Inventory/Stock per Dollar Demand):

Capacitance in electronics refers to a component's ability to store electrical charge, similar to how a capacitor stores energy. In the economic analogy, capacitance signifies the capacity of the system to store value in terms of production inventory or stock in response to demand (motivating force). Measured in coulombs per volt, it quantifies the amount of production inventory per unit of demand (dollars of production inventory/stock per dollar demand).

TIDES OF TIME: OSCILLATIONS OF DOOM

A comprehensive depiction of an ideal industry finds its electronic counterpart in various symbolic representations. The simplest manner involves portraying demand through voltage and supply via current. By doing so, the relationship transforms into what is termed an “admittance,” shaped by three economic factors: foresight flow, present flow, and hindsight flow.

• Foresight flow is the outcome of the tendency of living entities to stockpile energy (such as food) for periods of low energy (like a winter season). It encompasses demands placed upon an economic system during these energy-deprived intervals, as exemplified in a production industry's inventory. In the realm of electronics, this demand—characterizing a pure capital industry—is depicted by capacitance, while the stored charge symbolizes the stock or resource. Due to the loading effect of inventory priorities, industry demand fulfillment exhibits a delay.

• Present flow operates sans delays, constituting an input-output synchronization—akin to a “hand to mouth” trajectory. In electronic terms, this specific demand—a pure use industry—is mirrored by conductance, acting as a straightforward economic valve, dissipating energy.

• Hindsight flow signifies habit or inertia. In the electronic realm, this parallels an inductor—economically equivalent to a pure service industry—where a current flow (economic analog of money flow) generates a magnetic field (economic analog of active human population), which, when the current (money flow) dwindles, collapses (as in war) to maintain the current (money flow – energy).

Other substantial alternatives to war as economic inductors or flywheels are open-ended social welfare programs or colossal (yet productive) open-ended space endeavors.

Yet, the predicament of stabilizing the economic system lies in excessive demand stemming from (1) boundless greed and (2) an abundance of population.

This engenders excessive economic inductance, only to be rectified by economic capacitance—true resources or value, manifesting as goods or services.

The social welfare program essentially constructs an unbounded credit-based system, engendering a fabricated capital industry to provide nonproductive individuals with shelter and sustenance. While having potential use, recipients essentially become state-owned in exchange for the “gift,” constituting an elite-controlled standing army. For he who foots the bill calls the shots.

Those ensnared in the economic cycle must rely on the elite for their fix of the economic drug. In this regard, large doses of stabilizing capacitance are introduced by leveraging the future “credit” of the world. This brings about the fourth law of motion—onset—where an action is executed, and the system is exited before the reflected reaction returns to the action point, yielding a delayed reaction.

Surviving the aftermath entails modifying the system before the reaction rebounds. Through this approach, politicians gain favor during their tenure, and the public bears the consequences later. The barometer of such politicians is the time delay.

A government similarly achieves this by printing money beyond the limits of the gross national product—a process termed inflation. This floods the public with ample currency, curbing their avarice, fostering false self-assurance, and temporarily abating hardship.

As an equilibrium cannot be sustained, war ultimately serves as the equalizing factor, given that it essentially eliminates the creditor. Politicians then assume the role of publicly sanctioned hitmen, rationalizing the act and shielding the public conscience from bloodshed.

Were people truly concerned for their peers, they would control their desires (greed, procreation, etc.), obviating reliance on a credit-based or welfare social framework, which pilfers from workers to appease idlers.

However, as most of the general populace refrains from restraint, only two avenues remain to mitigate the economic inductance of the system:

1. Let the masses decimate one another through war, leading to complete annihilation of the living planet.

2. Seize global control using economic “silent weapons” through a form of “quiet warfare,” reducing the economic inductance of the world to a safe threshold via a process of benevolent servitude and population reduction.

The latter course has been unequivocally chosen as the superior alternative. By now, it should be glaringly evident to readers why unwavering secrecy regarding the silent weapons is imperative. The public at large shuns improving its own intellect and faith in fellow humans. It has evolved into a proliferation of barbarians, effectively a scourge upon the Earth.

Their apathy toward economic science obstructs them from grasping the reason behind their continued engagement in war, despite their professed religious morality. Their reluctance to address practical worldly concerns renders the solution to earthly issues beyond their reach.

Hence, only a handful of those genuinely willing to think and adapt, as the most resilient survivors, possess the capacity to untangle this conundrum for themselves—joining the select few who genuinely care. Without this, divulging the silent weapon's nature would obliterate the lone prospect of conserving the seeds of a future, authentic humanity.

DEFINING INDUSTRIES AND HOUSEHOLD MODELS

The industries of finance (banking), manufacturing, and government, counterparts to the pure industries of capital, goods, and services, are readily defined due to their logical structure. This enables their processes to be described mathematically and their technical coefficients to be deduced with ease. However, this isn't the case with the service industry known as the household industry.

Should we represent the industry flow diagram as a 2-block system with households on the right and all other industries on the left, we observe the following:

The arrows marked A, B, C, and so forth, moving from left to right, signify the flow of economic value from industries in the left block to the industry labeled 'households' in the right block. These arrows represent the monthly consumer flows of commodities such as A – alcoholic beverages, B – beef, C – coffee, and so on, up to U – unknown, etc.

The challenge that theoretical economists face lies in the fact that predicting the consumer preferences of any household isn't straightforward, and the technical coefficients of a single household tend to be a nonlinear, complex, and variable function of factors like income and prices.

While computer data derived from the universal product code (UPC) combined with credit-card purchases as individual household identifiers could potentially address this issue, the widespread implementation of a CBDC system where every purchase can finally be monitored is not yet realized. As a workaround for this data limitation, the aforementioned alternate method of analysis known as economic shock testing has been adopted.

In economics, this translates to studying all households within a region or even the entire nation as a group or class, rather than on an individual basis. This approach focuses on mass behavior rather than individual behavior, aiding in the estimation of useful technical coefficients governing the economic framework of the hypothetical single-household industry.

One approach to determining the technical coefficients of the household industry involves inducing shocks to commodity prices and observing the resulting changes in the sales of all commodities.

In recent times, the application of Operations Research to the examination of the public economy has become evident to those familiar with the principles of shock testing.

In the process of shock testing an aircraft airframe, the recoil impulse generated by firing a gun mounted on that airframe generates shock waves within the structure. These shock waves inform aviation engineers about the conditions under which certain portions of the airplane, the entire aircraft, or its wings might initiate vibrations or flutter, akin to a guitar string, a flute reed, or a tuning fork. This knowledge helps them anticipate potential disintegration or failure of the aircraft during flight.

Economic engineers similarly achieve comparable outcomes when studying the behavior of the economy and the consumer public. They do this by deliberately selecting a staple commodity, such as beef, coffee, gasoline, or sugar, and inducing an abrupt shift or shock in its price or availability. This sudden change disrupts everyone's budget and purchasing habits.

The ensuing shock waves are then observed by monitoring alterations in advertising, pricing, and sales of the targeted commodity as well as other commodities.

The aim of these studies is to gain the expertise required to steer the public economy into a predictable state of motion or transformation, even to orchestrate a controlled, self-destructive state of motion. Such a state would persuade the public that certain “expert” figures should seize control of the monetary system and reinstate security (rather than upholding liberty and justice) for all. This tactic renders the citizens incapable of managing their financial affairs, effectively leading to their complete enslavement and rendering them a source of inexpensive labor.

Beyond the prices of commodities, the availability of labor can also serve as a means for shock testing. Labor strikes, particularly in vital service sectors such as transportation, communication, and public utilities (energy, water, waste collection), effectively deliver test shocks to an economy.

Through shock testing, it is discerned that there exists a direct correlation between the availability of money circulating within an economy and the genuine psychological outlook and behavior of the masses dependent on that money supply.

For instance, a quantifiable quantitative connection exists between the price of gasoline and the likelihood of someone experiencing a headache, feeling an urge to watch a violent movie, smoke a cigarette, or visit a bar for a beer.

It is fascinating to note that by scrutinizing and gauging the economic models individuals adopt to evade their problems and evade reality, along with the application of the mathematical principles of Operations Research, it becomes possible to program computers to predict the most likely sequence of engineered events (shocks). This calculated sequence can ultimately lead to the complete control and subjugation of the public by undermining the public economy.

SOCIETAL AMPLIFIERS

Societal amplifiers form the dynamic components of societal and economic engineering. The fundamental attribute shared by all amplifiers, be they mechanical, electrical, or economic, is their capacity to take in an input control signal and harness energy from an independent energy source. This harnessed energy is then directed to a designated output terminal predictably, directly corresponding to the initial input control signal.

One of the simplest manifestations of an economic amplifier is the tool of advertising. If a TV advertisement addresses an individual as if they were a twelve-year-old, the power of suggestibility can lead them, with a certain likelihood, to react to the suggestion much like a twelve-year-old would. As a result, they might impulsively tap into their economic resources and purchase the advertised product when encountering it in a store.

An economic amplifier can accommodate multiple inputs and outputs. Its response may be instantaneous or exhibit a delay. Its symbolic representation could be akin to a rotary switch when its options are mutually exclusive and qualitative – such as “go” or “no-go.” Alternatively, its internal parametric relationships can be defined by a matrix with internal energy sources depicted.

Regardless of its form, the principal objective of an economic amplifier is to modulate the flow of energy from a source to an output destination, in direct correlation with an input control signal. As a result, it earns its name as an active circuit component or element.

Economic amplifiers are categorized into strategic classes, and unlike electronic amplifiers, the distinct internal operations of an economic amplifier are labeled logistical instead of electrical. This is because economic amplifiers not only provide power gain but also trigger transformations within the economic network.

When designing an economic amplifier, we must be mindful of at least five key functions:

1. The available input signals.

2. The desired objectives for output control.

3. The overarching strategic objective.

4. The available sources of economic power.

5. The logistical choices.

The process of defining, assessing, and integrating these elements, along with the economic amplifier, into an economic system is often referred to as game theory.

The blueprint of an economic amplifier commences with determining the power level of the output, which can span from personal to national scales. The next crucial consideration is the precision of response, or how accurately the output action reflects the input commands. A combination of high gain and robust feedback mechanisms helps achieve the requisite accuracy.

It's important to note that most inaccuracies are likely to stem from the input data signal. Personal input data tends to be specific, while national input data typically takes on a statistical nature.

It is also significant to keep in mind that all that follows are the exact data points and sources the NSA collects on absolutely EVERYONE! It is basically the blueprint of your file stored in a database in a NSA server center somewhere in Nevada.

Short List of Inputs

General

Questions to be answered:

• what?

• where?

• why?

• when?

• how?

• who?

General sources of information:

• telephone taps

• Big Data (Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta)

• analysis of garbage

• surveillance

• behavior of children in school

Standard of living by:

• food

• shelter

• clothing

• transportation

Social contacts:

• Smartphone - itemized record of calls, messages, etc.

• family – marriage certificates, birth certificates, etc.

• friends, associates, etc.

• memberships in organizations

• political affiliation

Your Personal Paper Trail

Personal buying habits, i.e., personal consumer preferences:

• checking accounts

• credit-card purchases

• “tagged” credit-card purchases – the credit-card purchase of products bearing the UPC (Universal Product Code)

Assets:

• checking accounts

• savings accounts

• real estate

• business

• automobile, etc.

• safety deposit at bank

• stock, crypto market

Liabilities:

• creditors

• enemies

• loans

• fear

• what one is willing to protect

Government sources (ploys):

• Welfare

• Social Security

• U.S.D.A. surplus food

• doles

• grants

• subsidies

• Principle of this ploy — the citizen will almost always make the collection of information easy if he can operate on the “free sandwich principle” of “eat now, and pay later.”

Government sources (via intimidation):

• Internal Revenue Service

• OSHA

• Census

• xKeyscore

• PRISM

• Fairview

• many more

Habit Patterns — Programming

Strengths and weaknesses:

• activities (sports, hobbies, etc.)

• “legal” (fear, anger, etc. — crime record)

• hospital records (drug sensitivities, reaction to pain, etc.)

• psychiatric records (fears, angers, disgusts, adaptability, reactions to stimuli, violence, suggestibility or hypnosis, pain, pleasure, love, and sex)

Methods of coping — of adaptability — behavior:

• consumption of alcohol

• consumption of drugs

• entertainment

• religious factors influencing behavior

• other methods of escaping from reality

Payment modus operandi (MO) — pay on time, etc.:

• payment of telephone bills

• energy purchases

• water purchases

• repayment of loans

• house payments

• automobile payments

• payments on credit cards

Political sensitivity:

• beliefs

• contacts

• position

• strengths/weaknesses

• projects/activities

Legal inputs — behavioral control (Excuses for investigation, search, arrest, or employment of force to modify behavior)

• court records

• police records — NCIC

• driving record

• reports made to police

• insurance information

• anti-establishment acquaintances

National Input Information

Business sources (via IRS, etc):

• prices of commodities

• sales

• investments in

  • stocks/inventory

  • production tools and machinery

  • buildings and improvements

  • the stock market

Banks and credit bureaus:

• credit information

• payment information

Miscellaneous sources:

• polls and surveys

• publications

• telephone records

• browsing history

• energy and utility purchases

Short List of Outputs

Manipulating Outputs to Influence Society and Economy

Influence over compensation and income is wielded by managing various controlled situations within the economy, thereby shaping societal behavior.

Key Steps:

1. Allocate Opportunities

2. Eliminate Opportunities

3. Regulate the Economic Landscape

4. Govern Raw Material Availability

5. Control Capital Distribution

6. Manipulate Bank Rates

7. Manage Currency Inflation

8. Control Property Ownership

9. Govern Industrial Capacity

10. Direct Manufacturing Processes

11. Regulate Goods Availability

12. Influence Commodity Prices

13. Control Labor Force and Services

14. Influence Payments to Officials

15. Govern Legal Processes

16. Control Personal Data Files – Unalterable Slanders

17. Manipulate Advertising

18. Influence Media Interaction

19. Shape TV Content

20. Divert Attention from Real Concerns

21. Stir Emotions

22. Create Disorder and Chaos

23. Control Tax Form Complexity

24. Manage Surveillance

25. Govern Information Storage

26. Develop Psychological Profiles

27. Govern Legal Processes (repeat of 15)

28. Influence Societal Factors

29. Govern Healthcare Choices

30. Exploit Vulnerabilities

31. Undermine Strengths

32. Drain Wealth and Resources

Table of Strategies

PRIME TACTICAL MOVES

Veil of Diversion

Experience has shown that the most effective way to establish control through a silent weapon is to maintain public ignorance about fundamental system principles while simultaneously keeping them preoccupied, bewildered, and distracted by trivial matters.

This is accomplished by:

• Distracting their intellectual pursuits and undermining mental engagement.

• Undermining cognitive activities and fostering a substandard education system lacking in mathematics, logic, systems design, and economics, thereby suppressing technical ingenuity.

• Appealing to emotions, encouraging excessive self-indulgence, and fostering engagement in emotional and physical activities through:

  • Relentless emotional bombardment and assaults (mental and emotional manipulation) through a continuous stream of sexual content, violence, and war presented in media, especially on television and in the internet .

  • Providing them with excessive and shallow content, a “thought diet” of trivial information, while depriving them of substantial nourishment.

  • Rewriting history and laws, subjecting the public to distorted narratives, leading them to shift their focus from personal needs to fabricated external priorities.

These tactics prevent the public's interest in and understanding of the silent weapons of social automation technology.

A guiding principle is that confusion yields profit; the more confusion, the greater the profit. Hence, the most effective approach is to generate problems and then present solutions as remedies.

• Media: Redirect the focus of the adult population from genuine societal concerns to trivial matters of no genuine significance.

• Schools: Ensure that the younger generation remains unaware of authentic mathematics, genuine economics, authentic law, and accurate history.

• Entertainment: Maintain public amusement at a level equivalent to or lower than sixth-grade comprehension.

• Work: Engage the public in ceaseless activity, preventing them from contemplating; return them to a state of perpetual busyness, akin to other creatures on a farm.

The Consent Conquest: Shaping the Victory

Consent, the Primary Victory: The functioning of a silent weapon system relies on information gleaned from a compliant population through methods that are legally endorsed (though not always morally justified). The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is a significant source of data for silent weapon systems developers, with a comprehensive list of sources available in “Studies in the Structure of the American Economy.”

This data is composed of meticulously organized information extracted from federal and state tax forms. These forms are meticulously prepared, compiled, and submitted by individuals coerced into labor through taxation and employers.

Moreover, the quantity of such forms submitted to the IRS serves as a valuable gauge of public consent, a crucial factor in strategic decision-making. Additional data streams are outlined in the Concise List of Inputs.

Grounded in psychology: When a government can impose taxes and seize private property without offering just compensation, it signifies that the populace is susceptible to submission and is granting consent to both enslavement and legal encroachment. A dependable and quantifiable sign of the optimal moment for action is the number of citizens who dutifully pay income tax despite evident lack of corresponding or ethical services from the government.

The Wellspring of Power: Sources of Amplification

The subsequent stage in the creation of an economic amplifier involves the revelation of energy sources. The pivotal energy sources that underpin any rudimentary economic structure include a reservoir of raw materials, along with the populace's concurrence to exert effort and consequently ascend to a specific stature, position, tier, or category within the societal hierarchy. This essentially involves contributing labor at varying strata within the social hierarchy.

Every tier, in ensuring its own income level, manages the layer directly beneath it, thereby perpetuating the hierarchical order. This engenders constancy and safeguard, but simultaneously instates control from the upper echelons.

With the passage of time and improvements in communication and education, the lower echelons of the societal workforce gain knowledge and yearn for the privileges enjoyed by the upper echelons. They begin to fathom energy systems and develop the capability to advocate for their ascent through the societal structure. This impairs the dominion of the privileged.

Should this ascent of the lower strata be deferred sufficiently, the privileged few can achieve mastery over energy, rendering labor by concurrence no longer a vital energy source.

However, until this energy mastery is unequivocally established, the concurrence of the populace to work and delegate decision-making must be heeded. Neglecting this could risk the populace's interference in the ultimate shift of energy control to the elite.

It's pivotal to acknowledge that at this juncture, public consent remains a crucial key to triggering the release of energy in the course of economic amplification. Therefore, consent, as a mechanism for unleashing energy, is the next subject under scrutiny.

Threads of Logistics: Controlling the Flow

Effectively executing a strategy demands meticulous examination of inputs, outputs, the interconnection between inputs and outputs, and the accessible energy reservoirs to energize the strategy. This scrutiny is referred to as logistics.

Initially, a logistical conundrum is addressed at its basic level, followed by the exploration of higher levels of intricacy as a fusion of fundamental constituents.

This signifies that a particular system is dissected, i.e., dissected into its component subsystems, and these, in turn, are dissected, ultimately culminating in the logistical “atom,” the individual, through this progressive process.

Genesis of Control: The Artificial Womb

Starting from the moment an individual departs its mother's womb, its entire endeavor is focused on constructing, sustaining, and seeking refuge in fabricated shelters, diverse forms of surrogate protective structures, or shells.

The fundamental aim of these man-made sanctuaries is twofold: to create a stable setting capable of accommodating both predictable and unpredictable activities, to ensure a haven for the evolutionary processes of development and maturation—essentially, survival; and to establish a safeguard for freedom and a shield for offensive endeavors.

This phenomenon is equally applicable to both the general populace and the privileged elite. Nevertheless, there exists a distinct dissimilarity in the approach employed by each of these societal strata in resolving challenges.

Nation's Puppetry: The Political Network of Dependency

The fundamental motivation behind the creation of a political framework by individual citizens within a nation is rooted in a subconscious yearning to perpetuate their established dependency dynamics from their formative years. In essence, they seek a human deity to alleviate all uncertainties in their lives, provide solace in times of trouble, attend to their wounds, ensure sustenance on every dining table, clothe their bodies, cradle them to sleep, and assure them that all will be well upon waking.

This collective yearning is astonishingly potent, prompting the human deity—the politician—to respond with astounding assurances, countering incredibility with incredibility, pledging the universe and delivering naught. In this exchange of dishonesty, one might ponder: Who stands as the grander fabricator — the public or the “godfather”?

This societal conduct stems from a surrender nurtured by fear, complacency, and convenience. It serves as the bedrock for the welfare state, functioning as a tactical instrument wielded against a complacent populace.

Dance of Dominion: Action and Offense

A considerable number of individuals aspire to possess the capacity to dominate or eliminate fellow human beings who disrupt their daily routines. Yet, they yearn to evade the ethical and spiritual dilemmas that such overt actions might instigate. Consequently, they delegate the unsavory tasks to others, including their own offspring, to ensure their own hands remain untarnished. They extol the humane treatment of animals, only to relish a savory hamburger sourced from an obscured, whitewashed abattoir nearby. However, what's even more paradoxical is their willingness to contribute taxes that fund a professional collective of enforcers referred to as politicians, while simultaneously lamenting the prevalence of corruption within the government.

Once more, the majority of individuals yearn for the liberty to engage in various pursuits such as exploration, yet they are held back by their apprehension of failure.

This fear of failure becomes evident in their tendency toward irresponsibility, particularly in entrusting personal obligations to others when success is uncertain or entails potential legal repercussions or liabilities that the individual is unwilling to assume. While they desire authority (derived from the root word “author”), they are unwilling to shoulder the associated responsibility or liability. Thus, they enlist politicians to confront the complexities of reality on their behalf.

The public elects politicians with the intention of:

• Gaining security without the burden of managing it.

• Achieving actions without grappling with the underlying thought processes.

• Inflicting theft, harm, and even death upon others without confronting the gravity of life or death.

• Avoiding responsibility for their own intentions.

• Reaping the benefits of reality and scientific advancements without investing effort in comprehending or mastering these subjects.

In granting politicians the authority to establish and oversee a machinery of war, their objectives include:

• Ensuring the survival of the nation, akin to a protective womb.

• Halting any encroachment on the nation's territory or interests.

• Eradicating any external enemy that poses a threat to the nation.

• Eliminating their own citizens who deviate from the norm in order to maintain stability.

Politicians occupy various quasi-military positions, ranging from law enforcement at the lowest level (akin to soldiers), followed by attorneys and certified public accountants (licensed spies and saboteurs), and judges who issue orders, effectively running a closed military operation for the highest bidder in the legal market. Generals are akin to industrialists, while the title of commander-in-chief at the “presidential” level is shared by international bankers. Although the populace recognizes that they have created and funded this charade through their taxes (implicitly granting consent), they often prefer submission to hypocrisy.

Consequently, a nation becomes divided into two distinct segments: a passive sub-nation, referred to as the “great silent majority,” and a political sub-nation. The political sub-nation remains connected to the docile sub-nation, tolerates it, and gradually exploits its resources until it grows sufficiently powerful to detach itself and eventually devour its parental counterpart.

The Enforced Fabric: Crafting the Draft

To arrive at informed computer-based economic judgments concerning war, which stands as the central economic flywheel, a fundamental prerequisite involves attributing tangible logistical quantifications to every facet within the framework of war – encompassing both human resources and material assets.

This procedure initiates with an unambiguous and forthright delineation of the constituent subsystems inherent in such a structural configuration.

Few endeavors in the realm of human behavioral modification prove to be as striking and efficacious as the socio-military institution recognized as the draft. A pivotal intention behind the draft or analogous institutions is to implant within the young men of a society an unquestioning belief, enforced through intimidation, in the omnipotence of the government. Swiftly, they realize that while a prayer may linger, a bullet can enact instant change. Thus, even a man conditioned in a religious context for eighteen years can be swiftly dismantled and purged of his reveries and illusions via this governmental instrument in a matter of months. Once this conviction is etched, the process of inculcation becomes notably facile.

Equally intriguing is the process through which the parents of a young man – individuals who ostensibly hold affection for him – can be persuaded to send him into the throes of war and potential demise. While the parameters of this work prevent an exhaustive expansion on this topic, a high-level overview remains feasible and can unveil the essential components that must be numerically incorporated into a computer analysis of social and war systems.

We commence with a preliminary definition of the draft. The draft (also known as selective service, among other names) stands as a mechanism of mandatory collective sacrifice and servitude, contrived by the mature and aged for the purpose of compelling the young to engage in unsavory public endeavors. Additionally, it serves to render the youth as culpable as their elders, effectively quelling youthful criticism of their senior counterparts (Generational Stabilizer). Marketed and endorsed to the populace as “patriotic = national” service, it functions as a manipulative device.

Once a candid and economic delineation of the draft is accomplished, this definition is harnessed to outline the perimeters of a construct labeled a Human Value System, which is subsequently transmuted into the parlance of game theory. The value of such a laborer is documented in a Human Values Table, a tabulation compartmentalized by intellect, experience, post-service employment demand, and the like.

A subset of these categories is commonplace and can be tentatively quantified in relation to the value of specific jobs with established remuneration. Some vocations pose more challenging valuation due to their specific alignment with the needs of social subversion – for instance, the value of a mother’s guidance to her daughter, eventually inducing behavioral expectations of a future spouse ten or fifteen years hence. In this way, by stifling resistance to a perversion of government, the process is facilitated for a banking conglomerate to procure control over the State of New York two decades down the line.

Such a dilemma leans significantly on insights garnered from wartime intelligence operations and diverse psychological assessments. Though raw mathematical models (algorithms, etc.) can be contrived, if not for prediction, then at least for predetermination of these occurrences with maximal certainty. What natural collaboration does not provide, calculated compulsion augments. Human beings function as machinery, levers to be grasped and manipulated, and there exists little tangible distinction between automating a society and automating a chip factory.

These derived values are variable. (A current Table of Human Values is essential for computerized analysis.) These values are presented in true magnitude rather than U.S. currency, given the latter's instability, owing to its current inflation surpassing the production of national commodities and services, generating a false kinetic energy (“paper” inductance).

Silver value remains more or less stable, as a gram of silver retains its buying power today as it did in 1920. Human value assessed in silver units undergoes minor shifts due to modifications in production technology.

Execution

I find myself in disagreement with the content that follows, as some of it seemingly aligns with cognitive bias or tendency to categorize people, ideas, or things into predefined and often oversimplified categories or stereotypes, without considering their full complexity or individuality. However, I anticipate that my conservative “identifying” readers may not be pleased to uncover that the entire framework for executing afore mentioned control systems rests upon convictions rooted in ideologies – that could very well be the content of a dumb and reactionary TPUSA rally, and were meticulously crafted by an - at heart - deeply conservative intelligence infrastructure, and apparently: it works brilliantly. I shamelessly paraphrase:

• Factor I: Just like in any approach to understanding social systems, achieving stability necessitates a profound comprehension and integration of human nature, encompassing patterns of action and reaction. Disregarding this aspect can result in catastrophic consequences, as is frequently the case.
  As in various societal constructs, some form of intimidation or incentive is indispensable for the successful implementation of the draft. The principles of action and reaction must be applied to both internal and external subsystems.
  To establish a robust draft, it is imperative to engage in individual conditioning and programming, exert control over the family unit, and influence the peer group.

• Factor II – Father: It is crucial to ensure that the head of the household aligns with the desired social norms and attitudes. This is achieved by molding the prospective father's perspective through the media, among other means, to make him more amenable to societal expectations before or shortly after marriage. He is led to believe that adhering to the predefined societal role is essential, as deviating from it will lead to a diminished sex life and a lack of companionship. He is convinced that women prioritize security over logical, principled, or honorable behavior.
  By the time his son faces the prospect of war, a father who lacks conviction will coerce his son into military service to avoid the disapproval of his peers or undermining his own self-esteem and opinions. Junior will be handed a weapon by a father whose resolve is feeble to prevent embarrassment. Thus, junior will participate in war, regardless of its true purpose.

• Factor III – Mother: Emotion takes precedence over logic for the female sector of society. In the tussle between reason and imagination, imagination emerges victorious, and fantasies prevail. Maternal instinct dictates that the child's well-being comes before all else, with the future ranking secondary. A woman holding her newborn sees neither cannon fodder for the wealthy nor a source of labor, no matter how inexpensive. Nevertheless, conditioning her to accept reality becomes necessary, either in due course or earlier.
  As this transition becomes more intricate, the family unit should be systematically disassembled. State-controlled education and government-run childcare centers must become more widespread and mandatory, aiming to detach the child from parental figures at an early age. The process can be expedited with behavioral medications.

• Factor IV – Junior: The emotional impetus for self-preservation during wartime, coupled with the self-serving outlook of those who can avoid combat, applies pressure on junior to join the war effort. These subtle forms of coercion manifest in the following ultimatums: “No sacrifice, no camaraderie; no glory, no romantic prospects.”

• Factor V – Sister: What about junior's sister? Showered with life's luxuries by her father and groomed to anticipate the same from her future spouse, irrespective of the cost.

• Factor VI – Cattle: Those who choose not to employ their cognitive faculties fare no better than those bereft of them. Thus, this mindless school of individuals—father, mother, son, and daughter—becomes either useful workhorses or trainers of the same.

---

Critics may contend that my words are merely an amalgamation of unsubstantiated claims, for which the author has never come forward to take ownership or responsibility. Those who hold such views overlook the evident truths encompassed within this document. They dismiss these truths as a reflection of their own ignorance, a reality they find challenging to confront.

However, it is accurate in its depiction of subsequent events that unfolded. It cannot be disregarded or brushed aside. The article is authentic, and its undeniable truths remain impervious to denial or dismissal. The core message is clear: One must acknowledge the role of being treated like cattle and the ultimate consequence of such treatment – enslavement – or make the choice to stand up and, if needed, lay down one's life to safeguard the inherent right to Freedom, granted by a higher power.

It is the concluding sentence that prompts individuals to turn away from statements like these. Many are not prepared to admit their status as mere cattle, nor are they ready to rally and potentially make the ultimate sacrifice for their Freedom. This reluctance is an indictment of the citizens of the United States of America. And this realization underscores the authenticity of the information presented within this article. I rest my case.